erynthered Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Three cheers the police officers that protect and serve. http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/02/Hillsbor...ds_ordeal.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 wow - talk about being like a scene from a movie... I'm just surprised they had all three guys fire a shot, you'd think that would increase the chance of killing the woman. But, they seem to know what they were doing. Good for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Three cheers the police officers that protect and serve.http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/02/Hillsbor...ds_ordeal.shtml 226257[/snapback] Indeed. I give 'em an "A+" for vermin control. We are NOT all equal, as this crumb found out.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Gun Control means being able to hit your target Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 So this guy was executed by the police. No judge, no jury and you guys are okay with this. Since when did this country start allowing the police to be judge, jury and executioner? This is said that we are glorifying the criminal actions of the police in this case. We as citizens should allow this to continue. How do we know he wasn't incorrectly identified? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 So this guy was executed by the police. No judge, no jury and you guys are okay with this. Since when did this country start allowing the police to be judge, jury and executioner? This is said that we are glorifying the criminal actions of the police in this case. We as citizens should allow this to continue. How do we know he wasn't incorrectly identified? 226281[/snapback] The guy was counting down the seconds to that innocent woman's death. But you're right. Maybe a few more seconds of talking would have worked. I mean, 150 minutes wasn't enough chance for him to give up. Maybe those last 12 seconds would have done it.. And personally, I trust the judgement of the dozens of police officers that were on the scene and knew the exact situation that the opinion of 12 people who were too stupid to avoid jury duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 So this guy was executed by the police. No judge, no jury and you guys are okay with this. Since when did this country start allowing the police to be judge, jury and executioner? This is said that we are glorifying the criminal actions of the police in this case. We as citizens should allow this to continue. How do we know he wasn't incorrectly identified? 226281[/snapback] i hope you are kidding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 The guy was counting down the seconds to that innocent woman's death. But you're right. Maybe a few more seconds of talking would have worked. I mean, 150 minutes wasn't enough chance for him to give up. Maybe those last 12 seconds would have done it.. And personally, I trust the judgement of the dozens of police officers that were on the scene and knew the exact situation that the opinion of 12 people who were too stupid to avoid jury duty. 226285[/snapback] It was sarcasm, BF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 So this guy was executed by the police. No judge, no jury and you guys are okay with this. Since when did this country start allowing the police to be judge, jury and executioner? This is said that we are glorifying the criminal actions of the police in this case. We as citizens should allow this to continue. How do we know he wasn't incorrectly identified? 226281[/snapback] A convict capturing someone and pointing a .38 at them. Bet you would change your opinion if that was your mother at the business end of that .38... Unless you are being sarcastic in your response...which is a verbal art and has no place in a chat room... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 The guy was counting down the seconds to that innocent woman's death. But you're right. Maybe a few more seconds of talking would have worked. I mean, 150 minutes wasn't enough chance for him to give up. Maybe those last 12 seconds would have done it.. And personally, I trust the judgement of the dozens of police officers that were on the scene and knew the exact situation that the opinion of 12 people who were too stupid to avoid jury duty. 226285[/snapback] How do you know she was innocent? Again no judge, no jury. He hadn't actually killed her so therefore he only stated he was going to. Stating that you are commiting a crime and doing so are two different things. You say a lot of "off the wall" things but we don't shoot you for them. How do you the police weren't corrupt? Also, if he did kill her they they would have proof he was going to following through and without her, they could have taken him alive for a judge and jury. Now he doesn't get his constitutional rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 It was sarcasm, BF. 226292[/snapback] I'm sorry, but some people use sarcasm here as if I am supposed to know them personally, and think they would never really have that thought... a simple </sarcasm> would help. Seriously, I've heard crazier things from people, and I've heard VABills say some off-the-wall crap. But, I'm hoping you're right. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 It was sarcasm, BF. 226292[/snapback] You have to be a mental midget not to understand that sarcasm plays extremely poorly over this medium. Don't adopt some sort of superior, all-knowing attitude about what is simply sloppy and ignorant intercourse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 sloppy and ignorant intercourse. 226297[/snapback] heh heh heh, you said intercourse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 heh heh heh, you said intercourse 226300[/snapback] Despite what they say about you, Gringo, you're alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 You have to be a mental midget not to understand that sarcasm plays extremely poorly over this medium. Don't adopt some sort of superior, all-knowing attitude about what is simply sloppy and ignorant intercourse. 226297[/snapback] It's as easy as considering the source (once again, the inability to look at the big picture rears its ugly head). Given the volumes of contrarian posts on similiar sublects from VA (A decorated Marine, which anyone with more than a couple of months on this board should know), it's pretty easy to discern what's sarcasm and what isn't. Thanks for using intercourse with its primary meaning. That's a dying art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 which is a verbal art and has no place in a chat room... 226293[/snapback] We're not in a chat room. It's a message board. Damn, we're going to need a class to explain the medium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 It's as easy as considering the source (once again, the inability to look at the big picture rears its ugly head). Given the volumes of contrarian posts on similiar sublects from VA (A decorated Marine, which anyone with more than a couple of months on this board should know), it's pretty easy to discern what's sarcasm and what isn't. Thanks for using intercourse with its primary meaning. That's a dying art. 226315[/snapback] Darin, he is just playing with you. There is no way that someone who has been around as long as stuck can be that oblivious to VA's posting style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 We're not in a chat room. It's a message board. Damn, we're going to need a class to explain the medium. 226317[/snapback] Oh, why don't you just pipe down you intellectual elitist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Darin, he is just playing with you. There is no way that someone who has been around as long as stuck can be that oblivious to VA's posting style. 226323[/snapback] Rat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Rat. 226389[/snapback] Rat? Now was that nice. The evidence is pretty much in Darins favor that you are giving him a threat with that statement. Does that mean we should call in SWAT to take you out before you hurt Darin's feelings. No we would bring you to a judge, have a trial of your peers, then make you Bubba's roommate. Not let some rogue police officer splatter your brain and hurt the "innocent girl". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts