\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Prom night: http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/02/dallas-school-teacher-accused-of-having-sex-with-student-after-prom.html/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 1. I would. 2. The kid is 18-years-old and she's facing 20 years in the clink? Wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Whats going on with these "Hot For Teachers" these days? Last few have been awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlegm Alley Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 She looks pretty battle hardened for 31. And for the record, I wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrags Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Not a chance in hell. Not even with BeerBalls dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Believe it or not.....no! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) The kid is 18-years-old and she's facing 20 years in the clink? Wrong. this kills me every time i see it, which lately has been a lot if they really want to stop 'underage sex' then they should start holding the younger participant responsible in some way too if a twelve year old hurts/kills somebody with a shotgun they try them as an adult and hold them responsible. if a sixteen year old injures someone with their car they try them as an adult and hold them responsible but if a fifteen to eighteen year old screws somebody older than them they claim the younger participant has no ability or responsibility WHATSOEVER to control their own genitals its crazy if the older participant gets a felony worth twenty years how about the younger participant getting a misdemeanor. how about a ticket and a fine. how about a smack in the back of the head and being grounded for a freakin week. all the younger participant gets is laid, some fawning over sympathy, and a story to tell. most likely they knew EXACTLY what they were doing when they got into it and know theres absolutely no consequence, so why not granted, we dont want younger people being taken advantage of, especially when theres some position of authority involved like student/teacher, boss/subordinate, or employer/employee. but to send someone to jail for a huge portion of their life when the other person involved in the incident that sent them there gets ABSOLUTELY NOTHING is pure lunacy i guarantee you, if we held teens even partially responsible for their involvement these instances would be dramatically reduced Edited February 12, 2013 by Meathead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts