BobChalmers Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Sorry - I meant Jets D is more of a "46" not a 4-6. The "46" name has nothing to do with the DL/LB allocation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 The jets used 3 downline men less than 20 percent of the time last year on defense. Why would we give up what should be the strength of this team? Another example of an ill informed Bills fan. Terrible thread! question: someone linked an "article" (bleacher) referencing a base 34 being run 35% + and that 335 was the second most common (no percentage given but another listed at 16-17% if i remember correct - the total between those two fronts alone was 54% is that inaccurate? just outdated (mightve been a year old, i dont recall)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwig van Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 The jets used 3 downline men less than 20 percent of the time last year on defense. Why would we give up what should be the strength of this team? Another example of an ill informed Bills fan. Terrible thread! Good point! I just read that myself. They use four or more lineman most of the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 The jets used 3 downline men less than 20 percent of the time last year on defense. Why would we give up what should be the strength of this team? Another example of an ill informed Bills fan. Terrible thread! That's great info, but your jab at the end was uncalled for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Williams, Dareus or Carrington? And what could we get for them? How about none of them? I love how everyone complains about the lack of depth on this team when the injuries start rolling in come October, but in the off season we can't wait to get rid of anyone who's not confirmed as a starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 How about none of them? I love how everyone complains about the lack of depth on this team when the injuries start rolling in come October, but in the off season we can't wait to get rid of anyone who's not confirmed as a starter. not just a starter but an all pro. and we should let the good ones walk because they are too expensive too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Yes... he did. And, he is the only pure 3-4 LB on the roster. I think Barnett is a pure ILB in a 3-4. He played much better in that scheme. We'll see if he's even on the team. How about none of them? I love how everyone complains about the lack of depth on this team when the injuries start rolling in come October, but in the off season we can't wait to get rid of anyone who's not confirmed as a starter. Exactly. Keep all of them. If they think Kyle is regressing, see what you can get for him. I'd keep them all. Still a strength on this team. I bet a real DC can utilize them better than previous regimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts