Chef Jim Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Individual proprietorships 73% 15,184,000 Partnerships 6% 1,248,000 Subchapter S corporations 10% 2,080,000 "C" corporations 11% 2,288,000 Hey look google is your friend. So answer me this you moron (and in case you're not paying attention I very rarely call people name here) how many of those 4,368,000 businesses cause more harm than good? According to you they all do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Hey look google is your friend. So answer me this you moron (and in case you're not paying attention I very rarely call people name here) how many of those 4,368,000 businesses cause more harm than good? According to you they all do. I didn't say they all did - your moronic question didn't allow me to be nuanced in my answer because you thought you were being so clever with your gotcha question- you thickheaded cuntservative dumbass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 I didn't say they all did - your moronic question didn't allow me to be nuanced in my answer because you thought you were being so clever with your gotcha question- you thickheaded cuntservative dumbass. That's true, Chef...he just said they do "more harm than good". So trivially, he's saying that 2,184,001 or more cause harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 (edited) I didn't say they all did - your moronic question didn't allow me to be nuanced in my answer because you thought you were being so clever with your gotcha question- you thickheaded cuntservative dumbass. If my question was so moronic that it wouldn't allow you to be nuanced in your answer why the hell did you answer it? Unless you're just trying to cover your ass. I never said you insinuated that all corporations cause more harm than good. That's why I asked you how many of the 4,368,000 of the companies that are incorporated caused more harm than good. So if not all corporations cause more harm than good. How many do? 10%, 5%, 15%, 75%, 2%, 95%? Some, a few, a lot? Edited April 18, 2011 by Chef Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 So let me ask you. Do corporations do more harm than good in this country? This is a yes/no question If my question was so moronic that it wouldn't allow you to be nuanced in your answer why the hell did you answer it? Unless you're just trying to cover your ass. I never said you insinuated that all corporations cause more harm than good. That's why I asked you how many of the 4,368,000 of the companies that are incorporated caused more harm than good. So if not all corporations cause more harm than good. How many do? 10%, 5%, 15%, 75%, 2%, 95%? Some, a few, a lot? The large financials, military industrial, big energy, big Pharmacological and big Agricultural all do more harm than good at this moment- They are destroying the political process and making a mockery of one man one vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 This is a yes/no question The large financials, military industrial, big energy, big Pharmacological and big Agricultural all do more harm than good at this moment- They are destroying the political process and making a mockery of one man one vote. So the companies that finance your home, provide you the power to run the computer you're posting on, keep you healthy, and feed you do more harm than good. You really are an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 So the companies that finance your home, provide you the power to run the computer you're posting on, keep you healthy, and feed you do more harm than good. You really are an idiot. You're talking like there would nothing in the space they vacate. You could the exact same thing about a communist state government- so the government that provides you shelter, provides you heat and electricity, provides you food and healthcare does more harm than good. you really are an idiot, comrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 I don't know who they are, but my communist friend posted one of these on my FB with the Zeitgeist founder. The guy's advocating outright communism and is treated like any other legitimate political movement. Not surprising that JTSP and lybob are so fond of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Educate yourself Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 (edited) That's what it is. It was originally called "Russia Today" Hillary's not a fan! lol China, Middle East, Russia ... all have their own International news services! How dare they! American politicians up in arms! LOL HELP!! Pam Geller "Islamization of America is upon us!" HELP ME! HELP ME!! LOL Edited April 19, 2011 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 (edited) I didn't say they all did - your moronic question didn't allow me to be nuanced in my answer because you thought you were being so clever with your gotcha question- you thickheaded cuntservative dumbass. Wow! what an ugly word, in my experiences people who use this word are usually low-lifes. Edited April 19, 2011 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Wow! what an ugly word, in my experiences people who use this word are usually low-lifes. Someone throws the first pejorative or ad hominem attack why should I hold back- if anyone wants to keep the debate at good natured level I will participate at the same level- I have seen none of that on this board from day one. The conservatives on this board reminds me of the Republicans at the national level, saying the most disrespectful things about Obama from day one, which is fine, but don't walk around like you got punched in the ovary when Obama fires back. Like Paul Ryan in this video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Someone throws the first pejorative or ad hominem attack why should I hold back- if anyone wants to keep the debate at good natured level I will participate at the same level- I have seen none of that on this board from day one. The conservatives on this board reminds me of the Republicans at the national level, saying the most disrespectful things about Obama from day one, which is fine, but don't walk around like you got punched in the ovary when Obama fires back. Like Paul Ryan in this video. youtube.com/watch?v=TsrRVbW4e-M&feature=feedu Wipe your pusssy bob. What you, and your collective group of liberal men (previously known as pusssies) lack in self-awareness is a lot. It's bad enough that you guys act like being an estrogen pumping pansy is a virtue, but what's really nauseating is the complete lack of any class or tact displayed from your entire side of the spectrum, and then when it gets thrown back at you you have the audacity to not only act, but genuinely feel offended. No President has had less class or character the Obama, and because he's on your side of the freedom equation you make excuse after excuse, so please, get an extra-absorbent tampon and plug it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 (edited) youtube.com/watch?v=x_qJxpA3_pc&feature=youtu.be The problem isn't hippies like this that are just blathering on in an attempt to get laid, the problem is that sometimes it actually works. That inspires more dolts to scramble for more air time in a bigger effort to get laid. The end result is all of us actually having to listen to this crap. Hillary's not a fan! lol China, Middle East, Russia ... all have their own International news services! How dare they! American politicians up in arms! LOL HELP!! Pam Geller "Islamization of America is upon us!" HELP ME! HELP ME!! LOL youtube.com/watch?v=F-UtR1ni1QA&feature=feedu You know when you'll be screaming HELP ME! HELP ME!? Right before your head is rolling down a flight of stairs, that's when. Edited April 19, 2011 by ieatcrayonz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 The problem isn't hippies like this that are just blathering on in an attempt to get laid, the problem is that sometimes it actually works. That inspires more dolts to scramble for more air time in a bigger effort to get laid. The end result is all of us actually having to listen to this crap. It's like using reductio ad absurdum, and when you reach the absurd equivalence, they realize not that their original idea was absurd, but that the absurd is consistent with their belief and therefore reasonable. You would think something like this would undermine the credibility of the source, yet people like bob are so impressed with this itellectual masturbation that he posts the link to another starry eyed communist being lauded by the same outlet. And as usual he's oblivious to the irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Wipe your pusssy bob. What you, and your collective group of liberal men (previously known as pusssies) lack in self-awareness is a lot. It's bad enough that you guys act like being an estrogen pumping pansy is a virtue, but what's really nauseating is the complete lack of any class or tact displayed from your entire side of the spectrum, and then when it gets thrown back at you you have the audacity to not only act, but genuinely feel offended. No President has had less class or character the Obama, and because he's on your side of the freedom equation you make excuse after excuse, so please, get an extra-absorbent tampon and plug it. Excellent Rob, Magox the Maggot almost made me wonder if I was going to far but on PPP no such thing- I'll punch you in the ovary later Roberta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Excellent Rob, Magox the Maggot almost made me wonder if I was going to far but on PPP no such thing- I'll punch you in the ovary later Roberta. I'm not so sure we both didn't. I guess we'll find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 You're talking like there would nothing in the space they vacate. You could the exact same thing about a communist state government- so the government that provides you shelter, provides you heat and electricity, provides you food and healthcare does more harm than good. you really are an idiot, comrade. Do you read what you write? Sloppy writing=sloppy thinking, but we already knew that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 You're talking like there would nothing in the space they vacate. Yeah, other corporations, nitwit. Educate yourself Rob youtube.com/watch?v=4qlgzTlAvOo&feature=related Jacque Fresco on Russia Television? This is what you base your socio-political philosophy on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 1. When socialists/Communists act like...socialists/Communists, why is it not OK to point that out? 2. Do any of the usual morons in this thread understand that historically, the Communist party, and the left in general have been against every single war in history....but one(WW2)? Taking the anti-war approach has nothing to do with morality, and everything to do with sowing unrest. such that it allows communists to gain power. Without unrest and fear, socialists/communists have no chance of gaining power. 3. Isn't it interesting that the Communists were against US involvement in WW2 from the very beginning, and their fervor went up even higher when the non-aggression pact was signed, only to have all of that washed away in a single day once the Nazis attacked the Communists? Suddenly all these "life long peace activists" were for all out war. Amazing. I guess a life's work spent casting aspersions on American's and American companies suddenly became irrelevant? What an epiphany! Is it a coincidence that the only war socialists were in favor of, is one were the only country where socialism had taken hold was in peril of getting wiped out completely? 4a. Is the phoniness of #3 instructive for anyone? Is anybody smart enough to see the obvious parallels here? We know who the idiots are on this board, and we aren't expecting much from you. This question is for the other people. 4b. What would happen if either Columbia got sick of Hugo Chavez funding the rebels in their country, and attacked Venezuela, or, pro-freedom forces inside Venezuela rebelled against Chavez? How much do you want to be that the far-left would demand that we get immediately involved and/or or help Chavez, right after they get done telling us that we should ignore Libya. 5. Given the historical reality of these far-left types, and given the other reality: we are ALL "anti-war", it's just that the grown-ups amongst us know that sometimes it is inevitable, why does anyone take any left-leaning person seriously when they talk about being "anti-war", or start trashing American corporations for being war-mongers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts