HOF4LOU Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 So remind me why Perry did not get the job ? He benched Trent and Lynch in favor of Fitz and Fred and e team played hard. We were very competitive despite numerous injured reserved. Led the league in picks....we criticized him for playing Fitz rather than Brohm. Remind me again why Perry did nit get the job or why he was not been taken seriously? Is it because we wanted a marquee name like Gailey?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flopagamo Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 Ah, good ol' 20/20 hindsight. It's easy when looking backwards...but it's hard to believe this team would be any worse off with Fewell as HC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I hate the Bills ! Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 Seems like the players liked playing for Perry, not sure they like "Toughness and Disipline" of Chan and the Pistol offense ! More like a pop gun ! I'm not sure who is gonna lose their job first Chan or Obama ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 Seems like the players liked playing for Perry, not sure they like "Toughness and Disipline" of Chan and the Pistol offense ! More like a pop gun ! I'm not sure who is gonna lose their job first Chan or Obama ! Pop gun or Pop Warner? It is unfortunate he is the DC for the giants instead of staying in Buf. If he was not quite ready for HC job, at least he was a good DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewHampshireBillsFan Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 So remind me why Perry did not get the job ? He benched Trent and Lynch in favor of Fitz and Fred and e team played hard. We were very competitive despite numerous injured reserved. Led the league in picks....we criticized him for playing Fitz rather than Brohm. Remind me again why Perry did nit get the job or why he was not been taken seriously? Is it because we wanted a marquee name like Gailey?? We got rid of Perry because we wanted an offensive minded HC. Gailey fits the bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quikchomp Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 Seems like the players liked playing for Perry, not sure they like "Toughness and Disipline" of Chan and the Pistol offense ! More like a pop gun ! I'm not sure who is gonna lose their job first Chan or Obama ! Kinda funny you make that comparison - both of them inherited a decade's worth of screwing up from previous administrations. As Bills fans and Americans, let's hope they both do well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrFishfinder Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 So remind me why Perry did not get the job ? He benched Trent and Lynch in favor of Fitz and Fred and e team played hard. We were very competitive despite numerous injured reserved. Led the league in picks....we criticized him for playing Fitz rather than Brohm. Remind me again why Perry did nit get the job or why he was not been taken seriously? Is it because we wanted a marquee name like Gailey?? Fewell has players now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldstorage5 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 So remind me why Perry did not get the job ? He benched Trent and Lynch in favor of Fitz and Fred and e team played hard. We were very competitive despite numerous injured reserved. Led the league in picks....we criticized him for playing Fitz rather than Brohm. Remind me again why Perry did nit get the job or why he was not been taken seriously? Is it because we wanted a marquee name like Gailey?? Ill say it.... Because he was black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 The only reason Fewell wasn't hired was because the stink of Jauron was on him. 90% of posters wanted nothing to do with him. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 He is doing great in NY. It is a whole different roster, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 The only reason Fewell wasn't hired was because the stink of Jauron was on him. 90% of posters wanted nothing to do with him. PTR The most true. Although I'm tempted on one of the previous posts. He was a Jauron guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Another Point of View Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 I wanted Fitz to start the season. To me it was obvious! Man did I take a beating for that one! I understand, the fans wanted a QB better then all 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy in 4C Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 His defense had 10 sacks last night. That's more than we will have all season... Go Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno Smith's Arm Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Gee, I heard that the Giants players are VERY disatisfied with Fewell, and that he is a the big problem with the defense (last nite not withstanding). It's not the DC, it's the players and the fact that the Bills have sucked for so long. They know the season is over, just like we do. They knew it BEFORE the Jets game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 The only reason Fewell wasn't hired was because the stink of Jauron was on him. 90% of posters wanted nothing to do with him. PTR Yup, but like usual, hindsight kicks in and everyone now wants to know why he wasn't kept. He looked good taking over the team last year, but everyone wanted him gone cause he didn't run the unstopable 3-4 defence that we had to change to. One of the biggest reasons for the 0-4 start and the way the team is looking right now (besides the fact that the schedule was tough enough on paper playing MIA, GB, NE, and NYJ) is that they decided to change everything at once. They had a decent defence last year that was good enough to keep them in games, but an offence that was inept and cost them games. if they would have kept the defence the same and focused on the offence this offseason, they would be alot further along................................ but we would be running the unstopable 3-4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlamnSam Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Kinda funny you make that comparison - both of them inherited a decade's worth of screwing up from previous administrations. As Bills fans and Americans, let's hope they both do well. Oh we're going to mix politics. Lets see Obama took an economy that was in a ditch and drove it over the cliff. I think Chan has done a hell of a better job than the fool in the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wardigital Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Oh we're going to mix politics. Lets see Obama took an economy that was in a ditch and drove it over the cliff. I think Chan has done a hell of a better job than the fool in the White House. The economy was in one of the three worst situations in American history when Obama was elected. He was elected almost specifically for that reason. It was not a ditch, it was a bottomless pit. This **** has no place in this part of the forum, and there is a reason people don't run to football fans when they are looking for sound political advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) The economy was in one of the three worst situations in American history when Obama was elected. He was elected almost specifically for that reason. It was not a ditch, it was a bottomless pit. This **** has no place in this part of the forum, and there is a reason people don't run to football fans when they are looking for sound political advice. Who has a better winning percentage this year? The Dems or the Bills? hahaha Also, it kind of sounds like you're mad he called out Obama. That's kind of funny, too! He was elected because he was not George Bush and McCains utter baffoonery. Edited October 5, 2010 by jboyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wardigital Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Who has a better winning percentage this year? The Dems or the Bills? hahaha Also, it kind of sounds like you're mad he called out Obama. That's kind of funny, too! He was elected because he was not George Bush and McCains utter baffoonery. Whatever it sounds like is wrong. I'm mad with stupidity. I think that Obama has done a generally awful job. I also think that it detracts from the argument when you make utterly ridiculous, patently false arguments about him. When someone says he took the economy from a ditch off a cliff, they are giving Obama credibility by being utterly and totally ridiculous. There are plenty of things to criticize about this President (or the last one, or, likely, the next one). How about we stick to the tangible stuff, instead of living in the deepest part of Glenn Beck's innards? And I took the tone I did because this stuff should stay in the political forum where the cast of One Flew's Over the Cuckoos Nest can consume their young in peace. This is the football part of the forum and I like it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Whatever it sounds like is wrong. I'm mad with stupidity. I was being serious, though. Someone should put up a thread about that on the PPP board. I stay away from that place, but it would be funny to make some wagers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts