Jump to content

With the Bills adding another RB, is Lynch going to be traded?


Recommended Posts

Lynch will not be traded to baltimor. They have just as many RBs as us. I think the team is really just fishing to see if lynch is expendable to trade. Or maybe they are looking for insurance in case something happens where lynch doesn't fit into the new system or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not trading for Gaither.

 

He won't sign for less than $12 M guaranteed and trading a top 45 pick to pay his lazy ass that kind of money would be too much of an admission that sending Peters on his way for the 28 overall pick and change was a bone-headed decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With another RB added, is Lynch trade bait? Will Lynch be part of a package deal to Baltimore for Gaither or traded to another team for either another player or draft pick?

 

 

Yes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With another RB added, is Lynch trade bait? Will Lynch be part of a package deal to Baltimore for Gaither or traded to another team for either another player or draft pick?

No. That only puts the RB count at 4. We'll keep 3 but traing camp needs bodies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!

 

 

No, seriously...who knows! One thing about this GM/Coaching tandem is that they are unpredictable so far! I can't figure out what their doing in free agency half the time...and I for sure couldn't figure out what the heck they are doing in the draft...so logic tells me that they will trade Lynch...which means that he's not going anywhere it's probably F. Jackson they'll trade...lmao, on that one! I'm back to who knows??? But, this new pickup from Indy doesn't have squat to do with

their overall objectives as this RB has very few carries in his time in Indy and sounds more like a special teams specialist to me to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not trading for Gaither.

 

He won't sign for less than $12 M guaranteed and trading a top 45 pick to pay his lazy ass that kind of money would be too much of an admission that sending Peters on his way for the 28 overall pick and change was a bone-headed decision.

 

Admitting you made a mistake is the first step towards rectifying it. The whole world already knows that trading away Peters was a brainless, cheapskate move that devastated our O-line and was probably the single biggest contributing factor to last year's debacle of a season, and only a kool-aid drinking fraction of Bills fans fail to realize that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admitting you made a mistake is the first step towards rectifying it. The whole world already knows that trading away Peters was a brainless, cheapskate move that devastated our O-line and was probably the single biggest contributing factor to last year's debacle of a season, and only a kool-aid drinking fraction of Bills fans fail to realize that.

 

The majority of posters must like sugar sweet kool-aid. What is obvious to some is not apparent to many. I'm in the camp that it was a disasterous transaction for us. If the Bills would have used last year's first pick for Oher the deal would have been palatable. An Oher/Woods pairing would have been a terrific fallback position for a Peters trade. Taking the invisible Maybin instead of Oher was moronic. The Bills have this laughable personnel philosophy: Trade an asset and then play a liability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...