bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 http://twitter.com/MrMichael_Smith/status/12646167926 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickelCity Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes, and I'd take Cody most likely. However, their offer would have to be pretty juicy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan72 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes, for a good price...include draft pick(s) next year too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we move to 24 im sorry but hello Tebow, and i hate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we move to 24 im sorry but hello Tebow, and i hate it Well move up from R2 into 1st to draft Tebow or move down and pick him? I'd take the later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mis3384 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes I would move down and we need to aquire more picks. I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. I WOULD NOT DRAFT TEBOW, because hes not a 1st RD value and NOT A GOOD QB I would draft DT -Price from UCLA, and then get a OT and WR in the 2nd RD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemhoff Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Well move up from R2 into 1st to draft Tebow or move down and pick him? I'd take the later. I agree, moving back with compensation is a more appealing scenario than trading away needed draft picks. I love the idea that we could pick up a few more draft picks this year. The Bills have so many holes to fill and this draft is perceived to be deep with talent, seems like the right move, although not splashy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes I would move down and we need to aquire more picks. I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. I WOULD NOT DRAFT TEBOW, because hes not a 1st RD value and NOT A GOOD QB I would draft DT -Price from UCLA, and then get a OT and WR in the 2nd RD Why draft a 43 UT? Don't think he has the skill set to be a 34 end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob16151 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I'd draft Cody at 24. Just stand there guy, and let the rest of the front 7 flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeSpeed Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 http://twitter.com/MrMichael_Smith/status/12646167926 ? Yes! Roger Saffold would be OK there. Clausen might even make it this far down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKRAAPY Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Yes I would move down and we need to aquire more picks. I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. I WOULD NOT DRAFT TEBOW, because hes not a 1st RD value and NOT A GOOD QB I would draft DT -Price from UCLA, and then get a OT and WR in the 2nd RD http://www.tidefans.com/forums/football/10...rence-cody.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Way up means higher than 9. They want Eric Berry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I WOULD NOT DRAFT CODY, he has attitude problems and weight management issues. care to elaborate on the attitude problems? ive never heard of those. from what ive heard is that hes a great kid with a hard upbringing. that if he fails it wont be from lack of effort or not caring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Way up means higher than 9. They want Eric Berry. 24 to 9 is 15 picks. I'd call that way up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertpaul49 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think a more likely trade would be with the Giants so they can get McClain. They released their starting inside linebacker, and there really isn't anyone else at ILB. However, it all depends on what the Eagles are willing to give up. What about a starting Left Tackle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 24 to 9 is 15 picks. I'd call that way up. Be that as it may, I don't think they're interested in our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 This has been done to death, but Philly isn't trading up to get Berry unless he falls to us or later. And he won't. They might trade up for Earl Thomas, but they won't have to go higher than Miami to do it. The Giants realize the depth at ILB in the draft and won't reach to trade the farm for McClain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playman Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 they are if the player they want is still there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 So say we get their 37th pick and their 105th pick. Slightly in our favor point wise. Would ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACor58 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I would swap picks and ask for Jason Peters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts