WellDressed Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Some folks must remember reading this strip as a youngster, things have changed. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/29/s...mp;#slide_image Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 What's the point of this? Nothing funny at all. Surprised that the Keane's or the Syndicate haven't sued his ass. They stopped one guy who used the cartoons unchanged, but changed the captions. You're probably one of those idiots that think Dane Cook is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 What's the point of this? Nothing funny at all. Surprised that the Keane's or the Syndicate haven't sued his ass. They stopped one guy who used the cartoons unchanged, but changed the captions. You're probably one of those idiots that think Dane Cook is funny. Yeah, anybody who doesn't share your sense of humor must be an idiot. I actually thought a couple were pretty funny...on a related note, here's a link to my favorite online comic strip. This could've been the next Gary Larson, but he quit about a year ago... http://pbfcomics.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 What's the point of this? Nothing funny at all. Surprised that the Keane's or the Syndicate haven't sued his ass. They stopped one guy who used the cartoons unchanged, but changed the captions. You're probably one of those idiots that think Dane Cook is funny. Well I guess we know in what direction Wacka's literary interests run. And parody fair-use is protected under copyright law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Did you read the comments at Huff Po? Most thought he had the intellect of a 14 year old.and they are all lefties. Oh and Dane Cook still isn't funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Well I guess we know in what direction Wacka's literary interests run.And parody fair-use is protected under copyright law. Ehhh. I wouldn't wade into the water too far, Simon. Parody does provide a protection, but it has its limits. Using an original Kane artwork cell in its entirety, then followed by a cell that's still ~90 percent the same drawing, then changes the underscript to play off of the original script.... I just don't think there's enough changed material for the parody-er to claim the work as substantively his/her own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Some folks must remember reading this strip as a youngster, things have changed. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/29/s...mp;#slide_image Outfuc#ingstanding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellDressed Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 What's the point of this? Nothing funny at all. Surprised that the Keane's or the Syndicate haven't sued his ass. They stopped one guy who used the cartoons unchanged, but changed the captions. You're probably one of those idiots that think Dane Cook is funny. Nope, not funny. Lewis Black and Paul Mooney are funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 This is like Garfield minus Garfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts