Gene Frenkle Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Yup and Bush and his boys have the shady **** market cornered. With regard to the Iraq War they certainly do. I honestly don't know how you can rationally defend it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 The weapons actually were Hellman's Mayonaisse. No country should possess something that devastating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 With regard to the Iraq War they certainly do. I honestly don't know how you can rationally defend it. you mean other than the majority of Democrats voting for the war, but you're right, other than that, there is no rational defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Things Posted November 22, 2009 Author Share Posted November 22, 2009 oh, this certainly isn't a partisan issue. There are MANY people on both sides of the isle with blood on their hands. I just wanted to say "Hi" to all the warmongers on this board. In the words of John Mellencamp... "Well there's blood on the hands of the rich politicians Red is the color of the sand and the sea Blood on the hands of an arrogant nation Who start all the bleeding over their policies... She had blood on her face so she had to get even She hemorrhaged and bled all over the land There's blood on the hands of those that keep silent Who won't count the bodies dead in the sand" I TOLD YOU SO. (once again... that ain't my thumb.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 oh, this certainly isn't a partisan issue. There are MANY people on both sides of the isle with blood on their hands.I just wanted to say "Hi" to all the warmongers on this board. In the words of John Mellencamp... "Well there's blood on the hands of the rich politicians Red is the color of the sand and the sea Blood on the hands of an arrogant nation Who start all the bleeding over their policies... She had blood on her face so she had to get even She hemorrhaged and bled all over the land There's blood on the hands of those that keep silent Who won't count the bodies dead in the sand" I TOLD YOU SO. (once again... that ain't my thumb.) Hard to argue with such a well presented, researched opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 oh, this certainly isn't a partisan issue. There are MANY people on both sides of the isle with blood on their hands.I just wanted to say "Hi" to all the warmongers on this board. In the words of John Mellencamp... "Well there's blood on the hands of the rich politicians Red is the color of the sand and the sea Blood on the hands of an arrogant nation Who start all the bleeding over their policies... She had blood on her face so she had to get even She hemorrhaged and bled all over the land There's blood on the hands of those that keep silent Who won't count the bodies dead in the sand" I TOLD YOU SO. (once again... that ain't my thumb.) Sabbath > Melloncamp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Things Posted November 22, 2009 Author Share Posted November 22, 2009 Sabbath > Melloncamp agreed. don't forget this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 agreed. don't forget this one... PJ? PastaJoe played with Bob Dylan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 agreed. don't forget this one... PJ ... LMFAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 Yes, we only initiated a war over it. No big deal. Nothing to see here. You are such a moron. We went to Iraq because Iraq was in violation of Resolution 1441. Whether or not he had WMD's ,Hussein wanted us to think he had WMD's. The IAEA and U.N. inspectors tried for months to go and take a look. They were denied. I feel no pity for Saddam. Nor should you. Fell sorry for every victim of terrorism both foreign and domestic. Selfishness and shamefulness is this Countries biggest opponent right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 We went to Iraq because Iraq was in violation of Resolution 1441. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 I knew it! You really don't know what you are talking about, do you? Let me guess, was it revenge or oil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I knew it! You really don't know what you are talking about, do you? Let me guess, was it revenge or oil? All of your posts should be preceded with "Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack" because you're nothing more than a parrot. UN Resolution enforcement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 You are such a moron. We went to Iraq because Iraq was in violation of Resolution 1441. Whether or not he had WMD's ,Hussein wanted us to think he had WMD's. The IAEA and U.N. inspectors tried for months to go and take a look. They were denied. I feel no pity for Saddam. Nor should you. Fell sorry for every victim of terrorism both foreign and domestic. Selfishness and shamefulness is this Countries biggest opponent right now. I feel sorry for the American soldiers who died as a result. Saddam confessed to his US captors before he died that he was putting up a front for fear of looking weak to Iran. In case you missed it, it turns out that Iraq really had shut down all WMD programs. On the surface, it seems he was taking a calculated risk and he lost. Still, looking at our "evidence" from the time, it was at suspect at best and at worst manufactured. Sorry if the truth doesn't mesh well with your ideology. In your completely worthless opinion, if a hyperbolic tool like yourself calls me a moron should I feel good or bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I feel sorry for the American soldiers who died as a result. Saddam confessed to his US captors before he died that he was putting up a front for fear of looking weak to Iran. In case you missed it, it turns out that Iraq really had shut down all WMD programs. On the surface, it seems he was taking a calculated risk and he lost. Still, looking at our "evidence" from the time, it was at suspect at best and at worst manufactured. Sorry if the truth doesn't mesh well with your ideology. In your completely worthless opinion, if a hyperbolic tool like yourself calls me a moron should I feel good or bad? You cannot have it both ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 You are such a moron. We went to Iraq because Iraq was in violation of Resolution 1441. Whether or not he had WMD's ,Hussein wanted us to think he had WMD's. The IAEA and U.N. inspectors tried for months to go and take a look. They were denied. I feel no pity for Saddam. Nor should you. Fell sorry for every victim of terrorism both foreign and domestic. Selfishness and shamefulness is this Countries biggest opponent right now. RIGHT NOW? Are you kidding me? they have been for years and are two of the biggest reasons we are a complete joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 All of your posts should be preceded with "Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack" because you're nothing more than a parrot. UN Resolution enforcement? Another side stepped answer. Your title should say troll not moderator. What was it revenge or oil? eh chicken! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Thank God you cowards don't run this Country. We would be worse off than we are now. I guess i should be thankful to have Barry Obama* in office. Yikes!!!! it could be one of you clowns. Take a hit for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Thank God you cowards don't run this Country. We would be worse off than we are now. I guess i should be thankful to have Barry Obama* in office. Yikes!!!! it could be one of you clowns. Take a hit for me. They wanted "Better than Bush" and they got it.....won't get us far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 You cannot have it both ways. Not trying to. My assertion, provided the evidence I've seen, is that Saddam was putting on a show of strength to keep Iran off his ass. He took a calculated risk that the US would not attack without actual evidence of WMD. Obviously he didn't realize who was running our country at the time. Lacking actual concrete evidence, the following was either manufactured or given very little investigation: - Claims of mobile WMD-producing labs hidden within traveling semis - Claims of yellowcake uranium sales from Nigeria - Claims of biological weapons actively being distributed to Iraqi troops - Claims of missiles armed with biological weapons - Claims that Iraq had secretly reconstituted its nuclear weapons program - Claims that Iraq was actively supporting Al Qaeda If these claims proved true, the case for war is solid and our cause would be just. As we all know now, NONE of these panned out. America was duped and if you should be pissed about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts