ishouldbegm Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 mcgee has been pretty bad sense his extention, especially his tackling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 mcgee has been pretty bad sense his extention, especially his tackling What sense was it? hearing, smelling, seeing, feeling? Actually you are wrong, McGee is still better than Greer is. Greer is just on a much better team. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skunkpost Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 McGee is rock solid, you should not be GM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotta Dream Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 crazy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lets_go_bills Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 McGee is better, you're just basing your thread on Greer's pick six yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 shoulda drafted arron rodgers instead of trent edwards sense hes beter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No QB - No Bueno Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 shoulda drafted arron rodgers instead of trent edwards sense hes beter Let's keep going with this theme: shoulda took my thum out of my but alot sooner, now my brayns impinged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 i'm a huge fan of greer (UT player) but he is not anywhere near as good as McGee. Greer was ready to start and wanted and deserved starter money. We might not have drafted McKelvin and kept him at corner, maybe and used the McKelvin pick to take...oh...maybe offensive tackle Ryan Clady who was drafted just after him. Having a first rate starting tackle on deck while you are being leveraged by Jason Peters might have sent a message, and if Jason did get signed having a Peters/Clady tackle combination might have been pretty darn effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StupidNation Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 i'm a huge fan of greer (UT player) but he is not anywhere near as good as McGee. Greer was ready to start and wanted and deserved starter money. We might not have drafted McKelvin and kept him at corner, maybe and used the McKelvin pick to take...oh...maybe offensive tackle Ryan Clady who was drafted just after him. Having a first rate starting tackle on deck while you are being leveraged by Jason Peters might have sent a message, and if Jason did get signed having a Peters/Clady tackle combination might have been pretty darn effective. I strongly disagree. Why sign a good player to decent money when you can overpay and lose a pick with a guy like McKelvin over a guy who would be a stronger contribution to the team on a position of more serious importance. I mean with decisions like yours we would consistently get better. What's your problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 What sense was it? hearing, smelling, seeing, feeling? Actually you are wrong, McGee is still better than Greer is. Greer is just on a much better team. Period. crikey....the only part of the Bills that is not a problem.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delete This Account Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 mcgee has been pretty bad sense his extention, especially his tackling ushouldspllrght. jw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDogg20 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Wish we could have em both still... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 mcgee has been pretty bad sense his extention, especially his tackling Yes they should have. Was CB a crying need? No. But that's one of those decisions a well run organization that's $30 million under the cap gets right. Greer was their best corner in 2008 and even though he missed some games to injury he has a whole lot less wear on his tires than McGee who seems to be constantly nagged by injuries that aren't significant enough to put him down for a long time, but render him ineffective for large portions of many games every season. Of course, a good organization would have known the combination of Greer and McGee was adequate at corner and with the exception of Peters their O-Line was not. Then they never drafted McKelvin, and as a previous poster pointed out, could have drafted Ryan Clady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 A better way to look at it is you resign Greer over drafting McKelvin. Greer would have been cheaper, and better IMO. this team creates it's own unecessary holes every year. Pat Williams, London Fletcher, Winfield, Greer, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 I'd rather have McGee and Greer and Ryan Clady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hb123 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 A better way to look at it is you resign Greer over drafting McKelvin. Greer would have been cheaper, and better IMO. this team creates it's own unecessary holes every year. Pat Williams, London Fletcher, Winfield, Greer, etc... and that along w/ poor coaching and talent evaluators is why the bills have sucked the past decade..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinii Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 A better way to look at it is you resign Greer over drafting McKelvin. Greer would have been cheaper, and better IMO. this team creates it's own unecessary holes every year. Pat Williams, London Fletcher, Winfield, Greer, etc... Etc, etc, etc..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 A better way to look at it is you resign Greer over drafting McKelvin. Greer would have been cheaper, and better IMO. this team creates it's own unecessary holes every year. Pat Williams, London Fletcher, Winfield, Greer, etc... And if they did that, we would have beat New England in the opener, McFumble wouldn't have been here to lose it for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 The problem lies witin the posters thread title - shouldve kept greer over mcgee imo. The Bills should have KEPT THEM BOTH. Then we have a great secondary. We can stil draft Corner in rd4 and even sign Florence if they fancy. With the Peters situation as it was I am suprised they went after a luxury pick (yet another corner) and did not focus on one of the 12 tackles that seemed to be drafted early that year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beebe's Kid Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 The problem lies witin the posters thread title - shouldve kept greer over mcgee imo. The Bills should have KEPT THEM BOTH. Then we have a great secondary. We can stil draft Corner in rd4 and even sign Florence if they fancy. With the Peters situation as it was I am suprised they went after a luxury pick (yet another corner) and did not focus on one of the 12 tackles that seemed to be drafted early that year. That isn't the way it goes...on TSW you only get one OR the other. Whitner OR Byrd, Jackson OR Lynch...and on and on and on and on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts