Search the Community

Lol Over 30% of officers killed on duty are killed by a black. Every “criminal justice reform” supporter can say nothing about this topic.

There are more black supremacists in the state of Michigan than there are white supremacists in the entire country. And that's even allowing for the very loose ADL (founded by proponents of a certain ethnostate as a response to the just trial and execution of a pedophile) definition of the term "white supremacist."

It's about Trump's trial so there's a decent amount of sarcasm thrown in there, but still contains a completely unexamined (and untrue) prior that helps undergird a couple of those "movements" you just mentioned. Does that mean you're a full-throated supporter? No, not necessarily. You're a stranger on the internet and we all know very little about each other in real life. But uncritically swallowing the idea that blacks were wrongfully convicted by "kkk DAs" en masse demonstrates at least some ignorance-bred sympathy for their positions.

For my fellow emo kids: MCR is doing a short tour called Long Live The Black Parade (follow up to their festival headline this year I assume, where they played The Black Parade in its entirety) in a few stadiums https://www.mychemicalromance.com/longlive

White leftists almost invariably have the same view on the blacks as scumbags have on their pit bulls: beloved pets who never do anything wrong unless provoked by a “systemic” narrative that cuts against them. White “conservatives” have a similar view but just express it in different ways, like the constant demonization of “white women” as the reason why Biden was elected. It is demonstrably false but it’s the only regime-approved way to attack the left’s rainbow coalition.

Oklahoma parole board members include: Mental health counselor Episcopal (that is, apostate from Christianity) "Bishop" Criminal defense attorney Social worker lol, lmao The lefty worship of black murderers would be funny if it wasn't civilizational suicide.

Someone recently responded to a reply I posted in the thread about Murderin' Marcellus, expressing disbelief and consternation at the notion that the concept of "anti-racism" is essentially a set of lies. While I am unsurprised that this particular board member embraces the aforementioned concept, I thought it would be useful for those who might find themselves aligned with conservative values of various stripes to understand what is actually meant by the term, and why opposing it is good and right. Whenever we critically approach what leftists claim is obvious or reasonable (when in fact it is neither), it is important to understand how the term was generated (that is, its genealogy, so to speak) and how it has been framed. Conservatives are generally bad at recognizing leftist framing and have readily adopted quite a bit of leftist language into their talking points, which concedes at least some portion of the leftist worldview. For a primer on framing, you can go here, but the tl;dr is that certain concepts or words have been designed through their construction and/or through priming to elicit an emotional response. In this case, you have been primed to believe that "racism" is wrong and evil (in fact, you may have heard that it's America's first and greatest sin). Therefore, you have been primed to believe that anything that is against racism must be right and good. The naming of the leftist concepts discussed below as "anti-racism" (aka "against racism") is thus a frame job designed to elicit positive emotions before you even know what the term actually means. To demolish the leftist frame and address the ideas hiding underneath them, you must trace the idea back to its source, consider the source, and consider whether adopting the idea has resulted in our country, or your life, being better or worse as a result. "Anti-" is just a prefix, so we first should examine the genealogy of the term "racism" and how it entered western consciousness, then focus on how once the people were thoroughly primed to recoil at even the mention of "racism," "anti-racist" was adopted by leftist agitators as a frame for their ideas that you would unwittingly accept simply because it's anti- that emotion you felt at the mention of "racism." The term "racism" is much younger than you probably think. First instance of the term in English is from the early 20th century, but both the common usage and modern understanding of racism began in the 1930s with the translation from German of Magnus Hirschfeld's book titled Racism. First, considering the source: Magnus Hirschfeld was a 19th/20th century jewish "sexologist" who (in)famously founded the "Institute of Sexual Research" in Weimar-era Berlin. This so-called institute facilitated the first "sex change" surgeries in Europe and helped drive the depravity of Weimar Berlin. For those not in the know Luigi Barzini describes that time like this: In short, like every other "pioneer" of modern gender or sexual theory, Hirschfeld is tied through his own words and works to some combination of genital mutilation and/or pedophilia. How many ideas of his should we really be adopting? It is worth noting further that though Hirschfeld's work was essentially the genesis of the modern understanding of the term "racism," its usage is fairly small until, big surprise here, the mid-1960s, when known communist agitators who worked tirelessly to begin the transformation of the United States from a proper nation to a failed state experienced their highest concentration of major successes (you can see the ngram here). Then came the add-ons: now there's structural racism, institutional racism, internalized racism, etc. all of which consist almost entirely (at first in academic circles, now in the mainstream) of circularly reasoned blood libel against Whites. In fact, research shows that Whites in America have the lowest in-group preference of any racial group. White animus toward a racial group simply as a result of their race as a problem, if it ever actually was a problem, fizzled out long ago. Black animus towards Whites, on the other hand, is quite a different story, as the interracial murder stats tell us year after year. Which brings us back to "anti-racism." Wikipedia will attempt to tell you that the roots of it go back to the 17th Century, though that is impossible given that words have meanings and the term "racism" hadn't even been invented yet. Mainstream sources will also gloss over the direct statements of those who actually theorize around anti-racism, instead priming you to believe that it simply is the reasonable response to the made-up sins of the various racisms. The term anti-racist was actually coined by the Black Panther Party (Leninist by admission) during the aforementioned 1960s, whose stated demands included that zero black people should ever be held responsible for crimes they may commit. Anti-racism for Whites includes the idea that Whites "must acknowledge and understand their privilege" (blood libel) and recognize that our entire society is, in fact, "White supremacist." It also includes the idea that any system, test, or other objective measure that has unequal racial outcomes (that is, that blacks do poorly in) is by definition racist (evil!!!). Therefore anytime Whites do well, it's due to racism, it's Whitey's fault, etc. meanwhile black underperformance can never be the fault of blacks (remember, crime stats are racist, IQ tests are racist, the SATs are racist, etc.). The system that "anti-racists" wish to design is one in which Whites have no authority, but all of the responsibility. Which is a succinct definition of slavery. Is this what we should want for our children? In other words, stop calling leftists "the real racists." Instead you should reject, categorically, terms imported by communists that your ancestors did just fine without. And laugh at them when they call you names invented their intellectual heroes (sodomites who liked to chop off genitals and ***** little boys).

Because banning guns will help the government* keep us safe!!! *Same government that perpetuated the following: Tuskegee Experiments Operation Paperclip Operation Northwoods Operation Mockingbird Gulf of Tonkin MKUltra Project Artichoke Subproject 68 Kent State COINTELPRO Iran Contra BCCI Chicago Black Sites Iraq “Incubator Babies” Ruby Ridge Waco Missing Trillions from the Pentagon Before 9/11 Abu Ghraib NSA Spying NDAA Operation Fast & Furious

Care to take a look and give us a quick analysis? The top dataset is white non-hispanic aged 0-17, inclusive. The bottom is black of any ethnicity aged 0-17, inclusive. Causes of death for all firearm codes 2018-2021.

Post-truth society, America style: if an obese black woman says it then it is fact. Yeah those 20 year old former slaves getting possessed by the demon James Crow causing them to shoot each other at rather impressive rates.

Statistically, what endangers black men is other black men.

The Piper at the Gates of Dawn - hot take alert, anything after this wasn’t really Pink Floyd Born in the USA - don’t think I’ll get any arguments here …And Justice for All - all that momentum and good will barreling into the 90s and Metallica takes advantage by doing their own version of Dylan going electric. No thanks. Metallica has four albums in my timeline. But in real life they became superstars off the back of the black album so I guess I don’t blame them.

"White supremacy movements are the biggest domestic terror threat in the nation" is another "the woke are more correct than the mainstream" moment. Southern border laid completely open to anyone? Not a threat to the regime because every one that ends up voting votes for democrats. 13% of the population committing 60% of all homicides? Not a threat to the regime, black crime holds territory for them. Antifa goon squads? NOI thought becoming mainstream? Foreign infiltration of every admin agency? Etc. etc. etc.

Yeah anyone who has bothered to read up on the matter knows that America as our fathers dreamed of it died in Dallas some sixty years ago. I hesitated to post ITT at first because I’ve barely been alive thirty years but in this age of information it’s hard to believe that anybody can take at face value the official stories of watergate and JFK’s murder (along with several other events in recent history). But here we are, with a Zyn addict trust fund baby blowing people’s minds by simply repeating barely-hidden facts on a network known better for the busty blondes than the journalism. The real crux of the whole thing is this: That’s the deep state. GS-15s or whatever with TS:SCI clearances who run, with zero effective oversight, some of the biggest and most powerful government agencies on earth. It’s not particularly insidious on its face, as the Q types would have you believe, it’s just that the most schoolmarmish, neurotic, and dorkish individuals tend to occupy these seats because those are the no-chested types who flourish in bureaucracies that refuse to reward true valiant striving. But since these all-grown-up theater kids now have some power with none of the requisite character to use it correctly, they wield it over their physical and spiritual betters like a headsman’s axe. Even after the democrats actually stole the election in 1960, Nixon showed that he had more character and good nature in his pinky finger than all the shot callers in the justice department combined. And his reward was to become a black smear in every “history” book that graces a classroom in this country. JFK wanted transparency and accountability from his government, and his reward was to have pieces of his skull splattered on the pavement of Dealey Plaza. And we wonder why new-to-the-game politicians talk a big game right up until they actually get where they want to go. I imagine the presidents-elect less familiar with DC inside baseball (see Clinton, William and Obama, Barack) tend to get a pretty hefty explanation of the carrot and stick that await them should they play ball or try to blow it up, respectively. Sorry for the longpoast this ***** bothers me.

Read my posts ITT. Engage the data. Victimization surveys reflect similar ratios as incarceration data. They are data from victims of crimes regardless of the outcome of the criminal justice system in regard to the crime. "Racism" is your all-purpose, faith-based rationalization for every interesting disparity in race-based data in America. And again, your "racism" boogeyman seems to not affect black women nearly as much as it does black men in regards to criminality. That seems odd since they're both black. It also skips over the fact that Hispanics as a group have actually decreased their arrest and incarceration rates in recent years. But that's an unwelcome distraction for those who make a living peddling the sacrament of "anti-racism." Read it again. 2600 offenders were black when the victim was black. Need to add 514 (white victim), 39 (victim of other race), and 24 (victim of unknown race) to that number.

Via those conservative rags Vox and the New York Times https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/3/21/17139300/economic-mobility-study-race-black-white-women-men-incarceration-income-chetty-hendren-jones-porter Edit to add: strange how racism has affected black women so much less than black men. They're only about 30% more likely to be incarcerated than white women raised with the same family income.

Black men raised by millionaires - the top one percent - are as likely to be incarcerated as white men raised in households with $36,000 in income.

I'm well aware of the numbers. But the OP is talking about a specific subset of crime and the victimization burden thereof. That you want to pull the wool over people's eyes doesn't change the numbers. Whites are about 5 times as numerous as blacks. But the number of victims of white on white crime is not 5 times as high as the number of victims of black on white crime. Curious! Additionally, from my earlier link:

I've provided both homicide data and violent crime data generally (excluding homicide, but we can add the UCR stats to the NCVS stats if you want quick and dirty math). The NCVS is violent crime other than homicide, in 2019 that split was 84/16 black on white/white on black. The UCR homicide stats split was 70/30. Homicide being rarer than the other violent crimes the final figure will be closer to the 84/16 than the 70/30. But in both cases the victimization burden is much higher for whites than for blacks when speaking on interracial crime.

As I implied but did not explicitly state: the NCVS doesn't capture homicide victimization because homicide victims are a tough interview. And again, you aren't engaging the OP. He stated "violent crime." Which is what I addressed. But in regard to homicide, in 2013 there were 598 homicides in which the races of both victim and offender were known and one was black while the other white. Over 68% of these cases were black on white homicide. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls

A 2011 report by the Obama admin found that between 1980 and 2008, black homicide offenders were more than 7x as numerous per capita as white homicide offenders. Meanwhile 84% of white homicide victims were killed by other whites and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks. The majority of violent crime is intraracial, but whites bear the victimization burden of interracial crime (particularly homicides) at a higher rate. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/homicide-trends-united-states-1980-2008

As has already been point out, racism is a faith-based explanation that doesn’t survive scrutiny or controls for commonly attributed effects of racism, such as SES. And once again you’ve failed to engage with all the data. Not only are blacks imprisoned and arrested at rates higher than one might expect given their population share, they also victimize people at a higher rate than their population share would predict based on victim statements. This removes the criminal justice system from the equation, including police and prosecutorial bias.

You’ve been trained for years to ignore things like this or write them off as outlier situations by the media and your fellow mainstream “conservatives” for decades. If you even mentioned the fact that black people could ruin any random white person’s life just by posting video of said white person objecting to a black person committing crime against them, you were cancelled and shunned. Which is why this needs to be broadcast to the world. Too many white conservatives have fooled themselves into thinking there’s a political solution for this. There isn’t. Your rights were stripped away. You don’t have freedom of association. You’re trapped with these people.

Group of black guys try to steal a bike from a pregnant white woman, make her cry and record her crying claiming that she's a racist, and she loses her job. But muh systemic racism!

Sure I can. Interrupting a black person committing a criminal act is punishable by life in prison or death, depending on whether the police or the mob get to you first.