finn

"Look you fans just don't get it. I keep telling you, 'Trust the process," but you don't. Do I have to spell it out for you? Read my lips: We're in the exact middle of a five-year plan. The playoffs were supposed to be no more than an outside possibility this year, but you act like we're a bunch of losers because we lost three games, two of them very close. What do you want, a perfect season? Blowouts every week? Beane and I haven't even had time to put in all the pieces yet, much less having them gel. Nice fans, booing us at home. Real loyal. And this forum! Haushka makes that kick and suddenly Allen is a clutch QB, the defense is historic, Daboll was wise to not force the run, and I'm candidate for Coach of the Year. But he misses it and suddenly Allen is a bust, Daboll an idiot, and I'm over my head. Give me a break. It must feel good to boast about us when we win and trash us when we lose, hiding behind your avatars, but at least don't believe, as some of you seem to, that you know what you're talking about or your opinion is worth squat. Are any of you loyal, not just thrilled when we win but behind us when we lose, patient while we rebuild this thing and just enjoying the ride?"

Yeah, but you stay with it. The Bills shut down Chubb on a few downs, but the Browns stuck with him. Five carries in an entire half does not show patience--or intelligence, not when you're going against a poor run defense with an excellent back and opt instead for a QB with one receiver going against an excellent pass defense. Boggles the mind.

Some perspective: the Bills weren't supposed to be 7-2, not with the weaknesses talked about here. Mayfield had Beckham and Landry to throw to. Allen had who else besides Brown? Give him one or two more players and another year of development, and an real 7-2 record will be plausible. Can't help but carp, though: Daboll. What the heck. Eight carries for one of the best players on the offense--someone doing great in the game. It's like his ego is attached to passing yards.

Does he remind anyone else of Thurman Thomas? Same low center of gravity, same shiftiness, similar frame...

Talking about fitting reality into a preconceived narrative.... He could be right, but I prefer analysts who let the evidence shape the conclusions, not the other way around.

Thanks for another astute post. As you pointed out, the game was an even match until the fumble. I think that turnover, deep in the Bills end after the defense had been playing its guts out, was a bridge too far for the defense. Yes, the coaches had no answer for the screens and QB scrambles, but my guess is that the Bills would have shut down many of those third downs if the game was still very close or the Bills had the lead. Emotion plays a critical role in football. It's hard to blame the players, either. There's no equivalent on the other side of the ball to the sense of betrayal and "WTF, man?!" when the offense turns the ball over, especially after a defensive stand and especially deep in one's own zone. It's different if the offense has bailed out the defense in the past, had their back when things the defense played poorly. But that hasn't happened this season.

I was disappointed and frustrated, too, but I was also impressed by some things the Bills did yesterday. Allen played under control most of the time and kept his eyes downfield. The OL usually gave him enough time to make throws, and he moved well in the pocket to evade the rush. Gore played really well, again. Duke Williams had a pair of nice blocks on the Singletary touchdown. Brown came to play, as always, and Singletary's TD run showed what he can do if Daboll ever decides to give him the ball. Special teams smothered the trick play. The defense contained the Eagles most of the first half and had good momentum until the lost fumble. In short, it wasn't all bad, not by a long shot. The Bills lost games like this even in the Super Bowl years.

Right. Ford could still turn out to be a monster, especially at guard. I do liked Duke a lot, too. He's ferocious and hungry,

I'm not usually a big fan of hindsight drafting, and I think Beane et all have done a great job overall drafting high-character, high-motor guys. But I do think they might have whiffed when they drafted Cody Ford instead of WR DK Metcalf in the second round last year. It's too early to be sure, and Ford could eventually become a monster, but we really could use a big, fast receiver like Metcalf, and we already had a nicely developing guard in Wyatt Teller. (Yes, they were/are hoping Ford will be RT, but his feet seem just too slow for that position.) I'll take a whiff in the second for a hit in virtually every other draft spot, but, let's face it, they seem to have blown it in the second. Do you agree?

Funny choice of quarterback for a ball-control offense. I wonder if the Bills would start Bates if they think he's better than Ford. You look foolish starting a guy who was an UDFA over your high-second round pick, that's the thing. They did it by promoting Duke over Zay Jones, but not until it was a glaringly obvious move.

The Patriots defense reminded me of Belichick's scheme against the Bills in the first Super Bowl. He shut down the pass and dared the Bills to run. When they did, Thurman scorched them, much like Gore did yesterday. But Kelly kept trying to throw into heavy coverage, much like Allen yesterday. The difference is that Kelly was Kelly and Allen is Allen. My point is that Daboll should have recognized that he was in a defensive battle and gone conservative: runs and short throws to the RBs and TEs. Not to take Allen off the hook. But even then you could say it's on Daboll. When he saw Allen was off, he could have done worse than simply run every single down, every one, even at the cost of three and out.

This will keep you on the fence (or "dense" ?), but it's not as simple as "he's got to learn not to play hero ball," as people keep saying. His hero ball successes are primarily why he generates so much excitement. Fans WANT him to hold on to the ball for five seconds, sidestep three defenders and heave the ball across his body and off his back foot--IF it leads to a TD or touchdown. They eat it up, call him "amazing" and "athletic." No one says then, "He's got to stop playing hero ball" then, even though it's exactly the type of stupid play we're lamenting today, with less luck involved. He might learn to play more conservatively and take the big shots only when they're smart, but his fans aren't helping him by ecstatically cheering him when they're not smart.

To be fair to Josh, he holds on to the ball too long and forces throws not to be a hero but because he thinks it will help his team. He's wicked competitive, and he has pulled off absurd throws in similar situations--and receives enormous praise for them. "Learning to be patient" means throwing the ball away even when he knows he can make the play--just in a small percentage of cases. I don't think most of us realize how hard the equation is: Do I chuck it and maybe get that huge shot of dopamine and have 60k people going wild? Or do I throw it away? I'm hoping letting down his teammates so badly will finally do the trick. If he had been even mediocre they would have won.

The Patsies don't seem to want this game too much.

Be nice to have that timeout wasted by the challenge...

Daboll: Throw to the tight ends and running backs. Nice easy short passes even Allen could complete.

Excellent post. Brady's comment about his ability to see the field so well reminds me of a similar comment by Steve Walsh of the 49ers toward the end of his career. Experience is an underrated factor in a QB's effectiveness. But don't forget about age. There's a reason the Kellys, Aikmans, Walshes and so on retire: They lose zip, they can't move as well or recover as quickly from injuries. Brady is an outlier, but I doubt he can play as well as he has for very much longer. He might know what's going on and where to go with the ball, but getting it there is another matter. Excellent post. Brady's comment about his ability to see the field so well reminds me of a similar comment by Steve Walsh of the 49ers toward the end of his career. Experience is an underrated factor in a QB's effectiveness. But don't forget about age. There's a reason the Kellys, Aikmans, Walshes and so on retire: They lose zip, they can't move as well or recover as quickly from injuries. Brady is an outlier, but I doubt he can play as well as he has for very much longer. He might know what's going on and where to go with the ball, but getting it there is another matter.

Daboll has no faith in our runners. Gives it to Allen instead or has him throw. They're teeing up on the QB.

Apologies to Kelly for my post: I didn't realize it was from one of our own and did not intend disrespect.

Loved it at first since much of it is accurate and hasn't been said enough. But then the writer started sanctifying him the way ESPN does Brady every chance it gets. A bit nauseating.

Not necessarily. Coaches are as susceptible to cognitive bias as the rest of us. It's hard to put aside Duke's unimpressive pedigree and see his skill set and performance in an objective light. Jeremy Lin was overlooked at virtually every point in his career because he is Korean, and "everyone knows" Koreans can't play basketball. If Duke were a fifth-round draft pick--and all else was exactly the same--people would be raving about him, not wondering if he's on the bubble.

D.K. Metcalf. very fast and tall, with a huge catch radius, a perfect fit for an big-armed, inaccurate quarterback. Plus, he'll be available at 9.

"geniuses"

Even if they blow the second half and end up losing, this game will mark a huge step forward.

Thanks. Wish I could hear his praise after all the trash talking from the announcers last week.