FloridaSnow

295

I think Obama should have played this angle up in Buffalo. People may have been into voting for a candidate whose platform was change (of ownership for the Bills). Over half of the posters here probably would have voted for him just for this reason. Please note, this post is for the purpose of humor only and does not reflect the poster's political views in any way shape or form or validate the initial poster's point. My apologies to the majority of you who will recognize this, but with post-election emotions running high, this post necessitated such a disclaimer.

Look, my friend, obviously no one has told you that our defense is to blame for our losses. Stop bringing logic into it and accept the rhetoric.

Jets, because I'd rather not see New England win the division.

Not that this really matters because this is a futile, very subjective exercise, but I'm not sure about Bulger, Quinn, or Rosenfels. Bulger is good when he isn't running for his life, Quinn looked good during the last game and it's a bit too early to tell, and Rosenfels seems to be running at a similar clip to Trent at the moment. However, with that said, I disagree with the initial poster's assessment. It's a bit too early to completely file Trent away. - Has Trent looked good lately, no. - Have people given him a bit of a free pass out of the hope that the disaster that has been our QB situation would straighten out, probably. - Still, Trent has a lot of potential and we need to stick with him for the season and see what happens. He is an unknown commodity, and our polarized reactions to everything he does are often not justified and a bit illogical. Maybe instead of using rhetoric that encourages such either/or assessments (he sucks/is great), we should just sit back and take things as they come without overreacting every time he throws a touchdown or an interception. With that said, I understand why people are beginning to become frustrated with the play of the team and Trent. Hopefully, we'll be overreacting in the other direction next week.

Wait, nevermind, that call just got overturned.

It looks like Miami is going to lose

If this were the cause, such penalties wouldn't occur when New England has the game in hand. What would be the point?

We're playing like we are the ones protecting a 10 point lead.

Did we really just punt?

This is it. Do we step up or sink? Time to find out what kind of a team we have.

Also, if our defense holds the Jets on that last drive and gets the ball back, the outcome may have been very different. The biggest difference between this game and the close games that we won earlier in the season is our defense's inability to come up big when we needed it.

Maybe the ineligible man down field rule only applies on punts?

RALLY TIME!!!!! :pirate:

wups, that's not a normal version of the video, but the gist is the same. Ignore the randomly added text.

Come on, we can still turn this around. Let's not give up yet. Here's some inspiration for ya: pirate:

Listen man, I know that this loss hurts, but everyone needs to calm down and take a deep breath. We are still 5-2 and tied for first place. Hopefully, this loss is pissing the players off as well and will make them focus on the big(ger) games against the Jets and Patriots.

Agreed. Our games against New England and New York also might be bumped up.

I'll be there. The town is great. If you have time, you should check out St. Augustine. It is the oldest town in the US and has some very interesting sights and cool bars. Go Bills!

Could someone who is familiar with legal matters explain if the NFL and Reebok can really to do this if push comes to shove. I'm probably wrong, but a person's name, even though it is simply being displayed on the back of a jersey, doesn't seem like something Reebok or the NFL has any control over. I know there is a history of precedence with players changing their jersey numbers, but there is a major difference between a name and a jersey number. Again, I might be wrong, but Johnson could probably force the issue with a lawsuit if he really wants to do so.

Awesome, let the qb controversy of the 08-09 season begin!

I can't think of a faster way to create strife in the clubhouse. It wouldn't just anger Peters but would also upset just about everyone else who reported to camp.

I will typically use either StubHub or Ebay; both of them work pretty well.

Sorry if this is a repost, as I'm sure that this topic is discussed in one of the game day threads. However, I thought that the issue deserved it's own thread. I was just really impressed by how well our tight ends played last night. Courtney Anderson seemed to play especially well, and it looks as though he might be able to be a good, big, physical target for us over the course of the season. I thought he was an underrated pickup when we acquired him because he's had a couple of good seasons in the past. I just wanted to know what everyone else thought about how the tight ends played? P.S. I think it's mandatory for all threads to mention Favre, Peters, Losman, Edwards, and how we will suck next year, so feel free to mention these topics as well.

8-8 because of the Jets' weak schedule.