It is accurate. Right or wrong, that's actually the point of the law.
Enough lawmakers felt that you are right, and the health of the fetus wasn't an issue for mothers. Enough lawmakers feel that a fetus is a living human whose rights aren't being protected. So they passed this law. This law is to try to protect the health of that living human. Disagree all you want, but that's accurate.
This is not a law about women's health. So to write a bill about a new law for Viagra and say that the two are the same is stupid. The viagra bill is a juvenile and asinine attempt to try to make a political point.
Do I like the ultrasound law? No.
2 main reasons:
1) I wish the gov't would get out of the baby business altogether. I despise abortions, but I don't see a law against abortion fixing the issue.
2) As I stated above, this law is an attempt to protect the fetus's life. It doesn't do that at all. So why is it necessary?