i'd like to know where whitner was supposed to be on that play. he came flying over after the catch was made. he has to see that matchup and find calvin johnson. but yes, it is really hard to figure out why poz was twenty yards away from the line of scrimmage with johnson.
this site usually has the games available for download after a couple days http://tenyardtracker.com/search.php
it occasionally gets whacked (probably by the nfl), but just about everyone i know who lives abroad and digs football uses it.
it was hard to believe that we called a timeout and then had poz on johnson. the defense continues to baffle me, but they only gave up twelve, so I'll give it a pass this week.
right on. the guy can coach. he has made some mistakes this year (which he acknowledged), but if fitz and the receivers tightened it up a bit today, then it wouldn't have been close.
great interview. he wasn't better than reed, but he was right there. mother-effing music city miracle. honestly didn't think that would be the last bills playoff game i'd see for a decade and counting.
i remember that face-mask call. the ref (or umpire?) was completely out of position. all he saw was bruce doing the the tomahawk and esiason's head snapping down. he was behind bruce and esiason. horrid call, changed the game.
no, thin-skinned based on his reactions to what i thought were often innocuous comments. there were also some people who were downright rude to him. big deal. i don't get offended when someone uses three question marks like a hysterical woman, even though there is no reason to use three question marks.
a more thoughtful reply would go like this: there is something between a garbage fluff piece like this that nobody with any semblance of a life should find interesting and knee-jerk negativity (jerry sullivan). just like there is plenty of room between the yahoo OMG page or whatever it's called and andy rooney.
if you think this is a fine example of journalism, then i reckon you're a person easily dismissed. hence my first reply. i'd further reckon that gaughan's piece would be part of any proposal to cut staff at a newspaper.
I liked the article. What I don't like is your pointless cynicism...
i'm glad you liked the article. i hear lindsay lohan is in trouble again. and what's up with that snooki girl? this stuff is like sooooooo interesting, yeah?
you're right. it is much more irritating because they are absolutely clueless on defense. a couple decades or so ago it was okay to have a story about dr. sack's shoes or musical tastes. we were winning and stories about colorful but mediocre defensive ends were fine.
jarius bloody byrd should not be waxing on about stroud's color coordination. he should either be watching film, catching ball from a jugs machine, or being whipped by angry chimay monks for looking like a clown most of the year.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/article220217.ece
valuable resources devoted to marcus stroud's fashion sense and sense of humor. is he a sensitive lover as well? is there anyone who cares about football who is interested in this tripe? is the news really that slow? is tomorrow's article going to be about who collects stamps and appreciates fine wine?
if there is nothing to write about in regard to the bills, then write about some local dart league, the UB Bulls, or any damn thing other than marcus stroud's wit. how about an analysis of his play this season?
"Of the 27 players drafted by the Bills in 2007 and 2008, a whopping five are still on the team."
the bills drafted 27 players in 2007 and 2008?
still, the gist of the article is correct. bad, bad drafts. bad, bad job by modrak.
he has dancing with the stars written all over him. he probably views his lack of football production as a major impediment to his career as a half-assed celebrity.