Patience

There are two serious groups that will be ready to purchase the Buffalo Bills when the proper time comes - one of them not affiliated with Jim Kelly. Both possess the necessary funds to purchase the team. Both of them fully intend to keep the Bills in Western New York. One of the groups intends to be ambitious regarding a new stadium, which they want closer to the U.S.-Canada border. The third group has a casual interest in purchasing the team, also with intentions to keep the team in Buffalo. There are no talks between Banner and the Bills. Won't happen.

I would be satisfied with moving down in the first round and selecting Mercilus with the pick. Easier said than done, though.

Agreed.

I am 21 years old, so since I grew up with that voice on NFL Films, it quickly became my favorite. Especially the Super Bowl XXV edition.

The video is included in post #7 of this thread. I know it's not Facenda. Gonna look up the other name. Edit: Don't think it's Kalas either, unless his voice changed quite a bit between that video and the recent one I just viewed. 2nd edit: Jeff Kaye, that's it! Thank you!

My favorite NFL Films voice of all-time. Anybody know his name?

I enjoy these articles; you're a talented writer. Keep them coming!

Brandon Jenkins, please.

Mularkey fired him, not Jauron.

Horrible news. RIP, Allen.

lol

Initials of this individual are GG.

A pass rusher.

I liked it - about time he shut his mouth.

And without that little, pesky iceberg - the Titanic never sinks.

Well, I was doing a great job keeping that game repressed.

I generally remain occupied with work and school throughout the week. On Saturdays, I am occupied with college football (Go Irish!).

1. DE 2. T 3. G 4. CB 5. OLB

He's correct - the Raiders are worse.

2004 - Bills vs. Steelers.

Maybin wants to experience the view of the press boxes on the OTHER side.

My last post in this thread: The link I posted fits precisely into the timeline. If you weren't lacking in reading ability, you would have noticed that I posted one link. Second, I have only posted what is relevant to this story. Third, please reference where I called it, "breaking news." I will not respond to it, I would just like to see where I said that.

100% false. I would advise that you not speak on topics that you clearly do not have correct information about.

No decent reporter will try to jump a story and get burned badly if it doesn't come to fruition. Imagine reporting the story only to find out that the samples taken were negative?

Yes. Why are they important? This is a football forum, where we care about the ramifications of a particular player being suspended because of league rules. If this was a pharmaceutical forum, I may be more inclined to oblige.