Jump to content

mannc

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mannc

  1. Would be gutsy . But two point conversion rate is only around 50% while extra point is still well over 90% even with the added distance this year? So it was still the right call by McCarthy.

    Wrong analysis. 1-point conversion puts you into OT, where you have at best 50% chance to win. A missed kick and game is over. So if success chance on 2-point conversion is 45% or better, then that is "playing the percentages" (assuming 90% success rate on the kick).

     

    Note: Actual percentages are 95% of extra point kicks made this year in the NFL and 48% success rate on 2-point conversions over past 3 years (Packers, 5 for 9 on two-pointers, and Crosby did not miss an extra point this year).

  2. Only thing that would have been better would have been the Pack going for 2 to win the game after the Hail Mary. Percentage-wise, it's probably the right call, especially with the new extra point rule, but none of the announcers even mentioned the possibility and I'm sure McCarthy never considered it. It's too bad. It would have been a gutsy, smart call.

  3.  

    It's unlikely a QB taken after the 1st rd will get a second contract with a team because it's unlikely he'll be given a chance. Still this statement is false David Garrard got a 2nd contract.

    Thank you. I doubt there is any fanbase in the NFL better able to come up with excuses NOT to draft a QB.

  4. Is it just me or does it always seem like, while lacking perfection, the college refs are much less involved in the outcome of games?

    Totally agree. Seem to be fewer phantom PI calls in college and the instant replay system seems to work better, too.

     

    And by the way, I LOVED that onside kick! The chances of recovering are actually quite high when the other team is not expecting it (i.e., the kicking team is not in desperation mode).

    Clemson was the third youngest team in cfb I believe - they could very well be back next year IMO. Watson is too good. Dabo is a great recruiter too and they will be hungry.

    And, most importantly, they play a cupcake schedule every year.
  5. No its allowed

     

    but lets do it in the proper context.....ALL GMS do this

     

    Of course. In general, it's not fair to say "why didn't we draft Antonio Brown in the fifth round?" But sometimes there are specific players that certain teams absolutely should have seen coming. In this case, Bryant since the Bills were obviously scouting his college team carefully and he is such a standout athlete. Russell Wilson is another example, given Wilson's outstanding college career and the Bills' crying need for a QB at the time, not to mention the worthless player they selected instead.

    Was buddy drafting in that draft for us?

    No. Whaley.
×
×
  • Create New...