DC Tom

Doesn't matter what you buy. Your belief is irrelevant to the fact: the Constitution specifies "advice and consent," but the Supreme Court has ruled that the means of "advice and consent" is entirely up to the Senate, and it begins when the nomination hits the chair's desk. There is no requirement to advance it to committee or a vote. And I supported Garland's nomination, and thought McConnell was being petulant and childish. But he acted entirely within established Senate procedure and Constitutional law.

Difference is that McConnell worked within Senate procedure and the Constitution to block Garland. Feinstein went outside it and abused the rights of a rape victim to inflame the mob.

That is a future domestic abuser.

I'm starting to lean towards CA seceding, just because I want to see how this grand "progressive democracy of victimized identity groups" works out. Who knows? Maybe Reiner goes down in history as one of the great political philosophers. Solon, Plato, Cicero, Thomas Aquinas, Hobbes, Jefferson, Marx,...Meathead.

Wait 'til they get around to demanding reparations for women...

A building fell on it.

Came here looking for a morinic Mahomes take. And I am very disappointed. You idiots are too idiotic to even idiot properly.

Reminder: hi's still a dumbass. What's amazing is that every single one of his opponents is dumber.

Just had another... "I admire Ford's strength and courage." "Even after she just announced she's not pursuing it anymore, now that it's politically irrelevant?" "!@#$ YOU! I'M REPORTING YOU TO TWITTER, YOU RAPE APOLOGIST!" People are just nuts.

I just had someone block me on Twitter, calling me "wilfully ignorant," for saying Kavanaugh should be tried in a court of law, not on the street. Looks like I stumbled on Twitter's gatorman.

Aaaaaaaand...we're done...

And written by that reporter. Just a few months ago, he wrote Trump was facing "a reckoning." If you follow the @Deranged Rhino theory of domestic events, it's like CNN is hoisting the white flag.

That is EXACTLY what the Democrats want. Don't forget the refrain after the 2016 election: "They voted against their own self-interest. They shouldn't be allowed to vote."

The dumbest are the ones that want to pass state laws saying "My state's delegates should go to the national majority vote winner." Literally, they're arguing for not being represented at all, and letting CA and TX decide for them.

That's not even basic civics. It's first grade math. "Why should people in Wyoming get more say than people in New York?" They LITERALLY don't, if you do the math.

I really do love watching the left tear itself apart over the meaning of meaningless bull ****.

That's what REPRESENTATIVES are for. Wyoming has two senators. NY has two senators. Wyoming has one representative. NY has 27 representatives. That is where the "will of the people" is expressed. You're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist.

"Senator Coons. Coons. Is he mocking me? He's mocking me, that racist !@#$."

Oooh, oooh, I know! Carmen Sandiego is in Egypt!

Don't do it, Booker! You never go full Spartacus.

And I oppose the Times not because of their editorial philosophy, but because of my lingering doubts about their honesty and evasive and intemperate articles.

#WomensWave? Aren't there feminine products to address that? (No, I'm not tweeting that.)

I'm not even sure they would have investigated it on their own. Just a "Hey, we can use this! Let's time it properly..." Really, in the past couple weeks, have the Democrats shown any real evidence they care about victims' rights? All I've seen is Democrats using them to generate outrage.

You know what's going to be hilarious? When the court has to rule on anything involving alcohol, and the small, select group of yahoos out there start demanding that he has to recuse himself.

And it didn't work. Facebook employees still want him gone.