Jump to content

DrDawkinstein

Community Member
  • Posts

    30,003
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DrDawkinstein

  1. 20 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    Nope I don't. I am still finishing him up (want to try and post my QB thread tonight all being well) but I have a 3rd round grade. But there are so many team with NOTHING at Quarterback. Of the six teams most commonly mocked to take a guy:

     

    Chicago, Washington, New England, Minnesota, Denver, Vegas..... the two best Quarterbacks currently on those rosters are Brissett and Minshew. They are the only two teams of those six (Pats and Raiders) who you can even make the argument they have a bridge guy. So teams are going to reach. Because they have zero alternative. 

     

    Not only do I agree with that McCarthy assessment, I also want to note I have Bo Nix behind him as well.

     

    There's going to be a LOT of reaching for QBs if the draft plays out like all the experts mock.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  2. My only nitpick is, if the board does fall like this, I think the Chiefs end up with Franklin or McConky over Polk.

     

    Out of those 3, I'd be happiest if the Chiefs went with Polk.

    9 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

     

    Thats the sad part...there are that many teams.  Chicago, Washington, and Patriots are the first 3 picks and all badly need a QB.  Giants seem to be ready for a change over Daniel Jones as they have been researching the QB's hard.  Vikings at 11 only have Sam Darnold and need one.  Broncos at 12 badly need one.  And Raiders do as well at 13.  That is 7 very QB needy teams in the first 13 picks.  

     

    So not a lock that 6 go, but 4 for sure are but 5 or 6 is quite possible.

     

    That's why if I'm the Giants, I'm looking to trade out of that spot and pick up an extra 1st for next year.

     

    They're stuck with Jones this year no matter what. Trade down, use picks to build the roster around the QB. Then use that extra 1st to maneuver around next year to get a QB.

     

    There are just soooo many teams taking QBs this year, and the pool is not nearly as deep as those folks are hoping.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 1
  3. Just now, PromoTheRobot said:

     

    There will be no blood letting in Sabreland, other than a bunch of assistant coaches. The Sabres are done changing coaches every two years. This is still a young team and it just takes longer to develop in the NHL. It sucks but that's how it is.

     

    Refresh

  4. Just now, Virgil said:

     

    In hindsight, I feel bad for not approving it.  That was the only trade attempt I denied for that reason.  In previous years, people got out of hand with it and some picks got traded 4 times.  I finally try to get ahead of that, and no one tried it.  

     

    No Fun League :censored:....

     

    jkjkjk, thanks for doing this every year. It's great for filling in this dead time between March Madness and the Draft.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  5. 1 minute ago, Jauronimo said:

    And now hes an offensive quality assistant.

     

    Seems like a great, low-stress gig for a guy about to be 60 and already sitting on $30M in the bank who wants to still hang out with his buddies during the day. 🤷‍♂️

  6. 51 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

     

    Oh yeah, I'm all for double dipping here.  And a Franklin/Polk combo looks like it would be a great combo.  Polk is a little bigger and more of an all around X/#1 WR, Franklin can be moved all over with his deep speed.  

     

    Fair enough, I dont mind double dipping at WR in this draft either. I'm just not sure I'd do it with our first 2 picks back to back, nor am I as sold on Polk. Looks to my (untrained) eye like another Gabe Davis clone. Who was decent for a 4th round pick, but not what I would be happy with from my 2nd round pick that was also a double-dip pick.

  7. 15 minutes ago, Virgil said:

    The Buffalo Bills select Javon Bullard, S, Georgia

     

    The Jacksonville Jaguars @Doc Brown are on the clock 

     

    So in hindsight, with the trade down, Bills pass on an opportunity to draft from the pool of Worthy/Mitchell/McConky/Legette in order to land Franklin and a 3rd round pick.

     

    IRL, the Bills could stay put at 28 and still draft Franklin.

     

    IMO, my issue with the trade down is abdicating our position ahead of KC (and even Baltimore), for not a lot in return. I'd rather pick before them and know we are getting OUR guy over having to settle for whoever is left after the teams we are competing with get to stock their cupboards.

     

    Just dont let KC jump us again!

    • Agree 1
  8. On 4/11/2024 at 9:54 PM, May Day 10 said:

    Didn't marrone want whaley and Brandon out?  Tried to leverage a decent Bills season and his contract clause... and lost.

     

    I wouldnt say he lost. He was in a win-win situation and leveraged it as much as he could.

     

    HC contracts are written with clauses that allow them to leave and still get paid IF there is a change in ownership.

     

    Marrone knew of this clause and seized the opportunity to make a power play. "I'm going to walk and make you pay out my contract while having to find a new HC unless you put me in charge of the entire FO". Pegula said no thanks, Marrone walked while still getting paid. And then got another gig so he was DOUBLE DIPPING that NFL HC salary. Probably made himself an extra $10-15M just for quitting a job.

  9. 4 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


    To play devils advocate why would teams want day 3 picks to move down if their aren’t draft able players

     

    Oh, its absolutely easier said than done. But teams might have different priorities. Maybe a new regime just came in and they want to bring in a bunch of "their" guys. Or may even need to make additional picks just to fill out the roster. Not necessarily because there is going to be so much talent left in those rounds.

     

    edit: For example, the Giants only have something like 5 or 6 picks in this draft. They need guys.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...