Chilly

Why not have a 75% tax rate? Gotta get the money for gubmint somehow.

I propose a 75% tax rate for your income then.

And with those two blank posts, the legend grows ever larger.

Sure they have, you just don't realize it because the effects weren't happening directly to you. Gotta start somewhere. You've got a choice to be part of the problem or part of an eventual solution.

For the love of God, and all that is holy, my anus is BLEEDING!

Ready to admit there aint much difference between the R and the D yet?

Here's a direct link to the recording... http://xssports.rack111.com/billsvssteelers/

This thread is full of win.

http://www.w3bdevil.com/forums/Understand-...y_(Pancake).jpg

I've heard that argument for a while now. Hell, there are always people convinced its the end of the world. 'Tis why Hagee is so popular.

I had the same gift card, used it after the draft to get a Lynch jersey and a Reebok Polo shirt, without having to pay anything out of pocket (they were having a 25% off sale). Might want to wait till they have a sale, stretch that gift card even further.

I r scurred.

Politician's video.

Yep. (AT&T)

Aww man, with that thread title I was expecting something like the tire inflating comment. Didn't hear any fun stuff, cept "I don't switch positions".

I think its true, after all, Trent was 9/11 passing the ball.

Depends, who are you planning on voting for?

You know what TSW does to people. $5 says you can find a comment about Texas to get me back.

Good God NBC's olympics website sucks ass. "You can only use this under Windows or Mac OS X".... its called standards you idiots. Load it up on Windows XP, and it wants to install Silverlight (who the hell uses silverlight?) Then it asks me for demographic information. If I choose not to give them Democraphic information, it plays some olympic intro commercial. When I finally gave it fake demographic info, it showed me the video I wanted. !@#$ NBC, !@#$ China, !@#$ Sweeden, !@#$ the IOC, !@#$ the Olympics. No, I'm not bitter.

Pennsyltucky has newspapers?

Wait, people like Obama and McCain aren't going to run for President? Sign me up.

Its not simplistic because its wrong, its simplistic because it ignores human behavior patterns and the associated consequences. Who was that? You keep talking about these people, but I can't find any of them. Here's the post where you switched from "pharmacists" to "pharmacies". Silly me thinking they were two different things. Notice that I keep talking about Pharmacists, like everyone else in the thread, except for you. 92% actually, for an 8% actual failure rate with BC versus a 15% failure rate with condoms, which doesn't include the availability factors with condoms. sh-- in one hand, wish in the other, and see which one fills up first. Depends on how its implemented.

Got yellow fever eh?

Ah yes, the utterly simplistic characterization of convenience, I love it. Then what the hell are you arguing with me and others for? Other widely available birth control methods are not just 1.7% less effective, unlike your claims (the actual effective failure rate of condoms is around 15% - you need to compare actual use rates, not best case scenarios). Doesn't really bother me either way, the state government seems like a great place to decide such issues. The states provide the licensing, they get to make the rules. Whooptie doo. By the way, that didn't have anything to do with the article posted.

Really? When have I posted in this thread that pharmacies should be required to carry them? Please, quote it. I'm eagerly waiting your response.