leh-nerd skin-erd

This is why sensible people must be grateful that extremists who share your sensibilities are few and far between, at least to this point.

I would say that applies to both parties. Same with claims of elections being rigged. Same with “no one is above the law” and when complaining about special treatment for the other guy but supporting it fully when it’s your guy. Be that as it may, it has nothing to do Presidential pardons or people being given life sentences. Do you believe, as does Tibs and perhaps Scraps, that all people arrested and charged for activity on 1/6 should have been given life sentences?

But that’s not how the justice system works, Tibs. If you have a problem with that you should move to Russia! Last time you asked me a question, I answered and believe you ended up on a milk carton. I find that a waste of time. I spoke out against the actions of 1/6 defendants on 1/6. I’ve not changed nor waivered on that, but if you are advocating for the Tibs mode of locking people up forever because they chanted something, you’re on the wrong side of history.

I’m not in favor of across the board pardons, but pardons/commutations on a case-by-case basis makes sense. Your statement “Lock them up forever!” hits to the heart of why. You’re advocating for what amounts to lynch mob justice, and that’s not what our system of justice is supposed to be about. With 1/6 defendants, we’re seeing/hearing stories about a justice system being contorted to make the action fit the penalty desired, excessive sentences, and long delays in getting defendants to trial. It actually reflects a deviation from the standards we see in our cities and towns across the country, where the movement is to get defendants back in the street quickly, bail reform and a movement away from criminalizing criminality like shoplifting and theft. Those guilty of serious crimes, assault etc…prison sentences make sense if they are consistent with other sentences handed out. Of course, generally, any individual pardoned issued by a president will likely be criticized by the other side, so we’ll just have to see.

Absolutely, just like explaining away Biden’s pilfering of classified docs, disclosing to his book partner, and his partner destroying evidence critical to the SC inv….after proclaiming indignation and assuming only Trump had documents to begin with. Common sense and human behavior suggested that made no sense.

Doesn’t this make sense though? He has worked in and around big business, politics, high society for decades, without much fuss until, well, you know. I was speaking with an attorney friend the other day, an accomplished guy with political connections that run deep in NYS. He’s from NYC or thereabouts, and was sharing his thoughts on the election. He’s not a fan of either candidate (but will support Trump), had some kind words for old Biden (not old age Joe, but Joe of old) as a statesman in spite of his politics. In spite of his tendency to spin tall tales (some say he makes things up more than he lies), it’s fair to acknowledge that. He was a guy like someone we all probably knew, blustery, a tendency to exaggerate, a quick wit, and on some level, likable. There’s not much left of that guy, but he existed.

Your father may have been a victim of the time and place he lived. People lived in a smaller world, with less access to information, societal norms established as they were, and (I’m assuming) during an era when people stayed within groups (ethnic, race) because survival often dictated it. When you factor in personal experience and trauma that people may have experienced, is it any wonder people developed animosity, distrust, hatred for others based on color or ethnicity? In fact, that likely wasn’t the exception, it was the rule. The real question imo is were roles reversed—you the parent from his era, he the child of yours, what might that look like? Anyway, my only point was that this guy is insane, certifiably, irretrievably and definitively based on the standards of any time.

Of course! Mostly, when the messaging is on point. Another voice. https://www.newsweek.com/caitlyn-jenner-trans-community-oversaturated-1795397

I think you’re correct here. I was reading the comments from Jillian Michaels (fitness trainer, businesswoman, reality tv personality) and her view on the state of California. In a nutshell, too extreme for her. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2024/06/13/jillian-michaels-california-move-victimology/74088965007/

I’m guessing the first ring suburb gives you the walkability/everything at your disposal housing you’re looking for? Would that move allow you and your wife to consciously uncouple from your automobile(s), assuming of course you haven’t already done so? I live in a first ring suburb, I can’t see it happening for me.

This is why I thought that the first condition would be the release of all hostages, and why, now, I'd suggest you reconsider your embargo on criticizing Hamas. https://nypost.com/2024/06/12/world-news/blinken-slams-hamas-for-rejecting-gaza-cease-fire-deal/

I'm average height, average weight, my eyes are a washed out blue-gray, my hair color matches the color of my skin, I drive a tan 2017 Camry with tan seats and 110,000 miles on it, and my actual first name is Bud or Buddy. I usually have to wait 15 or 20 minutes for cold cuts at the deli, even when I have number 19 and they are serving 24. My wife says I'm the man of her dreams, but she struggles with insomnia and says it doesn't really bother her.

There's no way you're a centrist, because I'm a centrist!

"Bernie bro"?! It says I'm a "Bernie Bro"?? What kind of sick game are you running here, Reich?

What would you consider an 'activist judge', and what other descriptors are available?

"Deflecting" when I answered your question directly? If I were you, I would seriously consider filing a lawsuit against the elementary school you attended, and every teacher who ever taught you under the Victims of Crappy Educators Act. Do you think AOC is corrupt under your standards?

It's not a 'win', it's an outcome. If played correctly, the evolving HB saga and JB's ties to China and the family business can yield fruit on the campaign trail. The band plays on.

You seem to be doing it now, at least in terms of the statements made by AOC and what you seem to feel defines 'corruption'. Life, Lance Armstrong, Jussie Smollette have taught me to be cautious in matters like this. There is always a possibility. I do not believe he is corrupt.

You posted a video of a member of Congress grossly distorting the perks of being in Congress, and we’re not even scratching the surface of the liberties taken there. it’s well known and well established. A simple acknowledgment that she’s probably not the most trustworthy source of information probably would helps with your credibility. As for politics and SC Justices, it’s clear from disclosures that the money and gifts flow freely to members of that institution. Liberal. Conservative. If you’re advocating for a thorough review top to bottom, and new laws/guidelines for all, perhaps that makes sense. But you don’t ever seem to want that—you just want to fixate on one man. I wonder why that is. In conjunction with that, though, a thorough analysis of our senators, representatives in Congress, and the Executive office would be necessary. Since that’s never going to happen, because benefits accrue to everyone involved, it seems silly for pretend otherwise. https://nypost.com/2023/09/13/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-says-shes-married-in-disclosure-forms-docs/amp/ …AOC gets a Tibsybuck, redeemable for one free pass on blatant hypocrisy!

It’s pretty well-established that the only real perk associated with being a member of Congress is the occasional $50 gift card from Target. Beyond that, these citizens are completely above reproach.

That’s why the work is so important.

What’s so funny ‘bout peace, love and understanding?

I’m hearing The Innocence Project may be looking into this. Stay tuned.

Were you down with AG Barr's decision post Mueller Report as the obvious correct call? What'd ya think(le), Frenkle?

I think if you ignore the things that happen to cause people to be distrustful in a case like this, sure, it’s a real crackerjack. I realize it’s imperfect, and when functioning properly it’s the best in the world. It’s just…how many federal gun cases like this do you suppose the intelligence community makes declarations to blow up the credibility of key evidence?