leh-nerd skin-erd

🤣 Didn’t someone say you had a lazy eye a while back?

Yeah, ok, like Publisher’s Clearinghouse is going to show up at my door with a check for a couple mill? Answer the durn phone!

That hair thing is a gift, you Bob Ross looking b*stard. I had a pretty good run all things considered. Hair loss started later in life, relatively speaking, and by the time it did I was in my “There are a lot worse things that could happen in life” mode.

You probably would think that, that doesn’t surprise me in the least. If we can agree you’re koo koo for Cocoa Puffs, that would be more fertile ground!

You’re right of course, who knows what’s in this guys history that yields this sort of madness. Can’t control the media narrative and the commercial press, they’re going to sell what they sell to people who buy what they sell. I believe more than ever we should treat the areas where we can find common ground with those on the other side of the aisle as fertile ground. Frankish may well be one of those pony-tail and bowtie wearing libs with a penchant for grandiose oration, but he’s correct here.

I don’t think it’s odd at all. Stop the Steal was a natural and very predictable outcome of Russiagate and the Mueller trials. However, with DJT’s return to the WH, and all that transpired after Biden took office, it seems priorities just shifted.

Ah, the old “Become that which you loathe” approach. Sounds like you’ve thought this one through. Godspeed, friend.

It’s probably just a perspective thing. Seems to me you pretty much hang around, cr@pping on people, negativity and ugliness seems to be where you’re most comfortable. I think it’s got to be pretty emotionally draining, and am most definitely glad I don’t see most things through that lens. It’s not that I haven’t had stretches like that—I have—but I feel like it it pretty much sucks. Anyway, thanks for almost believing in me. I’ll keep holding out hope for you.

Welp, you probably shouldn’t declare again how you don’t and won’t read what I write, because it makes you look kind of silly when just a short time later you’re scouring posts of others, reading what I write and responding to me. I knew you were not being completely truthful with yourself, I told you so and here we are. Talk soon, 4th&fibber.

I’m just an observer with a vote Fergs. Andy1 mentioned my comment about a “liberal” judge, and it’s a fair one for both you and he to ask about. If it gets thrown out, it gets thrown out. If it goes to trial, and he wins, he wins. If it goes to trial and he loses, he loses. It happens.

Hello Andy! Fair point. If a conservative judge tosses the case we end up at the same place—a seemingly flawed guy who is not the hero of the tale, and someone many Americans will see as above the law. I’m all for letting him have his say in court. As for helping to get Trump elected, I disagree. Clinton had her issues, the issue had to be dealt with, and he provided her with the absolute best outcome under the circumstances. (Quick reminder—that was back when mishandling classified documents was no big deal, then it became a cause for life imprisonment, then switched back to no big deal for the old folk with a poor memory). Hunter Biden was well on his way to a sweetheart deal when timing caught up with him. That’s what happens at that level of government, Nard-dog.

So, this is where they start to lose me--and I've felt the worst offenders from 1/6 should not have been pardoned (while those overcharged were deserving of a second chance). Why would Christopher Wray not be truthful in front of Congress about the number of FBI-associated persons in/about the Capitol on 1/6? Why offer up a number like 26 when the actual number is 10x that figure? What's the point? Did he not know the actual number--is incompetence the answer? Did he deceive the committee intentionally, and if so, for what reason? Now, the FBI is directly contradicting what you are saying here, Roundy, and releasing details that at a minium contradict what Wray said. It's like the same thing happens each time we go through this. Why weren't the American people told the truth about the Christopher Steele-Hillary Clinton arrangements when Obama/Biden/Brennan were briefed before Trump was inaugurated? Why wasn't Faucci transparent in the country's involvement with China, Wuhan lab and Covid research when the virus first spread to the US? And back to Trump and 1/6. It absolutey defies logic that Trump, and only Trump, would be responsible for security on 1/6. Liberal leaders alleged he was partnering with Putin for 4 years, raged that he might try and overthrow the government, and you're telling me the incoming admin (and top dem leadership) sat back and accepted that everything was going to fine? We already know that Pelosi's fingerprints are on the National Guard issue, but none of these things make sense.

The Trump scenario was weighed and considered by the American people and you saw the results as they played out at election time. Enough people rejected the notion of the silliness of the Bragg prosecution, the absurdity of the Carroll verdict and the Biden DOJ raiding his home while Biden himself had been holding classified documents for many years. The only thing that matters now is the Trump beat him, Biden et al and is President, and there sure seems like a lot of smoke around Comey. Maybe he’ll get his day in court, maybe a liberal judge dismisses the case but I’ll say this—-there is nothing about him that suggests he’s the hero of the tale.

In fairness he’s 75% committed to being situationally flexible. He was anti classified docs in a former presidents home, then realized he was part of the pro-Slippage movement while being against presidential pardons before he was for them until January 2025 when he was against them again.

Well this was a complete bust of a storyline. Thanks for being honest, I guess.

Walls be closing, maybe?

Oh, I had heard something about that somewhere along the line.

Frankish, did you work with the type of inmates seen in the obviously true-to-life movie Caged Heat as a federale? If so, were you ever offered, uh, I mean like was there ever a quid pro q….what I mean is were plea deals cut in the best interest of all concerned parties? Like, did you find yourself behind on your work with any regularity? And why was @Wacka why were you riding his bike outside the prison yard during outdoor time? Were you tossing contraband over the fence? I live such an uneventful life.

I heard she was crazy.

I see where you’re going here. She’s Jason Bourne?

In spite of her comments that 107 days was not enough, in retrospect she has to be thrilled she didn’t get 214! Even ardent, hard-core Kamalalites like Tibsy, Roundy and 4th might have jumped ship!

I agree with @Figster here. Charlie Kirk was killed because one lunatic decided that he should die and was willing to carry out the deed. We can discuss rhetoric, inflammatory language, and those that hated him for his beliefs, and of course people who idolize the shooter (like all those people out there who see the scumb@g who stalked and murdered Brian Thompson), but those are different issues. To quote Elton John, “It’s funny how one insect can damage so much grain.”

I wonder if one of the multiple people Fergie thinks I am might not feel the same. I’ll mention it to myself later if I see me.

Thank you for sharing the link.

I had no idea a gridiron was a cooking apparatus until 30 seconds ago. I thought it was a football reference, and reading quickly missed the point. My bad there. As for the rest of your post, if I see any of the several people you see pretending to be who they are not, I’ll say hello for you.