Jump to content

Gene Frenkle

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gene Frenkle

  1. Hopefully it'll lead to a lot of tackle eligible plays to Peters in the end zone. Either way, if they're moving him to LT permanently, they must think he'll be a good enough T to make the switch. It will be interesting to watch, especially if the Shelton trade goes through.
  2. WHY?!?!?!?! Very nice debate, fellas. A good read all the way through.
  3. Given factual proof of a plot by al Quada (harbored by the Taliban) to attack the USA pre September 11, I would have supported a preemptive invasion of Afghanistan. Did I miss something? Was it even an option? Did Dubya deem the al Quada threat to be anything more than an inconvenience at that point? But then again, I supported the invasion of Iraq based on the lies spewed by this administration prior to this war. I made the mistake of trusting this president, like so many others. Now I know better, unlike many here.
  4. If our intentions were so pure and we were so very concerned about what went on in Halabja in 1988, we should have done something about it the first time we invaded Iraq in 1991. Gee, that's only 3 years later! These crimes were horrible - a black mark against humanity. Why did we wait nearly 15 years before doing something about it? Hindsight being 20/20, of course, you'll use anything to justify this administrations actions. Do you think you're fooling anyone but yourself? As it turns out, despite any good that may have come from this colossal blunder, our fine leaders were flat out wrong (or simply lied) about Iraq's WMD capabilities. I don't care how many news articles you show about the atrocities Saddam committed against his people. This is not why we were told we were invading Iraq. Hey, if they told us the truth, we might have supported it! We were told that Iraq posed a clear and present danger to the USA. That was a flat-out lie, but you already know all this. It's been beaten to death like RJ behind our 2001 O-Line. A link in case you missed it: PROOF!!!
  5. I don't necessarily believe any of Titor's stuff, but if you really read what he wrote, it's pretty difficult to poke holes in his story. He describes some cutting edge thinking in physics to explain his method of time travel.
  6. Looks like that hit a little close to home. Don't get all bent out of shape. What I said is the truth. Everyone here has been guilty of the same from time to time.
  7. BTW, this thread is much more of a pile-on than a 'debate'. Even you can see that!
  8. This whole board is nothing but a bad re-run of itself. I'm only doing my part like the rest of you, Mr. Ex-Presidential Candidate.
  9. Here there is only one right point of view. You mind your manners before you're dealt with!
  10. Yes, of course, I'm obviously ignoring a great deal of wonderful insight My bad
  11. I don't pretend to be above anything, but I do not blindly support the company line like many here. All I'm saying is that you should be prepared for severe intolerance if your views tend to fall on the left. If I respond to this intolerance in kind, well, I guess that's (one of) my shortcomings - at least I admit this. There is no constructive debate on this board, so why bother? I think the responses to my first post prove this conclusively, "Alaska."
  12. Quit while you're ahead. In case you can't tell, there's an EXTREME right lean on this board. It's really best to just read it and laugh at the fact that such little thought goes into opinions they will defend to the death. There is no debate here, only attacks. They are here to make each other feel good about being Righties.
  13. Hell yeah, don't be talking sh-- about Toby. Toby totally rocks!
  14. I agree, the Godfather is a better movie, but the LOTR trilogy as a whole is better than the Godfather trilogy as a whole. #3 was terrible! This is an interesting list: http://www.imdb.com/chart/top
  15. I'd take Peerless Price back if he came at a reasonable salary. We've seen what he can do when as a #2, and here he'd be a #3.
  16. Yes, because post count is the only sceintific way to determine whether or not someone has a good point. I think that the magic number is 16,000. After that, all your posts are good ones.
  17. But...you don't vote for Republicans, even though your views consistantly fall to the right. I'm sure you're 'independence' is really making a difference. You've proven yourself to share nearly every Republican viewpoint, yet say that you are not a Republican so that you can claim some sort of ideological or moral superiority. It's utter BS. If it smells like a Republican and talks like a Republican and thinks like a Republican then it's probably Alaska Darin. Deny it if you like, but I'd venture to guess that you've voted for a hell of a lot more Republicans than Democrats. Maybe you've mixed in some Independents to keep yourself honest, but who are you trying to fool? Somtimes our actions define who and what we are.
  18. So...you don't agree with Democrats and therefore don't vote for them. But...you don't vote for Republicans, even though your views consistantly fall to the right. So...you obviously like the idea of yourself as a noble independent who is above all this two-party crap, effectively rendering yourself and your vote relatively meaningless. Keep fighting the good fight and putting down the Libs while pretending you're not Conservative. It's SO tired. "If not for her, the federal gov't would have closed some of the VA hospitals in NYS, at a time of increasing disabled vets." - PastaJoe He already gave one thing, which is one more than you used to support your claim that she is a bad senator.
  19. This thread has really added a lot to the board, Mrs. Belichick. Thanks.
  20. Best not sign any offensive linemen, lest it appear that we are pandering to the needs of Bledsoe.
  21. Wiley's production in Buffalo can be directly linked to having Bruce Smith on the same line. He was never as good as his numbers and he proved that when he left.
  22. It's clear that even the "Red Staters" are OK with medical marijuana. It's a shame that the Bush administration seems so dead-set against it. Hopefully the Supreme Court does not hold the same views and will abide by what is obviously the will of the majority in this matter.
×
×
  • Create New...