plenzmd1

He missed more as only one was born outside the US #Trumpisgod crowd says don't take everything Trump says as literal, until they say "this is literally what Trump said" the phrase " go back to where they came from " is freaking offensive to the majority of people in this country.. have you heard him claim the UK , or countries like or Switzerland etc that have socialist systems chitholes? Or charactrized them the way he does in this series of tweets? Now just top piss you all off, I am going to hot yoga shitless..let that vision sink in!!!

again, to the the majority of people it is. Prolly an unfair question, but what makes a statement racist in you mind? Dis Trump need to say " ya know, those 4 Black women need to go back to where they came from" to make it racist? No, i will vehemently argue this point. Trump has not said all nations outside the US are chitholes etc, only those where the great majority of the populace is people of color. what did he not say? That immigrants were dirty? That they came here to breed? That these 4 women should go back to where they come from? What part did he not say?

It is not a gross mischaracterization, it is what happens on this board routinely. Disagree with a Trump policy, or a Trump communication etc, and be branded OrangeManBad or TDS..Happens to me all the time, no matter how often i agree with him...as soon as i disagree its only cause #orangemanbad. We should have a hashtag on here #Trumpisgod to conteract In terms of rthis tweet being racist. the phrase"they should go back to where they came from" is widely associated worldwide with racist groups and far right groups.. If you believe to be racist statement has to explicitly state the color of someone's skin, then you are right, there is no way Trump will ever say anything racist, nor will anyone in this world for the most part. So these people should go back where they came from, they are dirty, they came here here to breed...all good!

How about racist because it is racist and vile and not because of of who said it. I mean at some point can anything or anyone on this board does not agree 100% with Trump and not be branded OrangeManBad or TDS? Be the same as brading all Trump sypporters Nazi's . How about we disagree with his some of his ideas, and tons of the way he communicates..and agree with other stuff he has done. Or do we all just have to kneel at the altar of Trump( or the Dems in Tibs case) and be afraid that if criticize or disagree with party/leader, that does not make us weaker.

attack them with all guns a blazing on their ideas, attack them aith your above quote and call them dishonest..all great.. that is America! That was not what this was...not even close and i agree to some extent....but to say Trump can say and tweet whatever the hell he wants cause some have used the race card to much?

Lets accept that at face value(which i do not), does not mean racism does not exist This is some master level logic here...Vincini would be proud. I am sure you are just getting started!

Not sure what context is lost at all. I do believe Trump is flesh and blood like the rest of us, and he makes mistakes and has deep character flaws. It’s okay to say that and still believe in his policies Confused on this post.

so you really think a POTUS telling brown people who oppose his views to " go back where you came from" is what MAGA stands for?

yep, sounds about right.

at some point ya call a cigar a cigar...he has tweeted racist things for three years..this one possibly the most blatant " brown people are not part of my America"..go back from where you came"! You always claim people with TDS cant see the forest for the trees, and it sure seems that goes both ways. If you cannot see this as a racist, baiting tweet, and call him out for it, i am lost. This is just pure red meat to his base, and if posting racist tweets is okay as a political strategy i think we have truly entered the 4th circle..and this guy is driving us there

I just don't know how yall total dismiss everything he says on twitter as "Trump being Trump"..anYall kill @Tiberius for what he says on social media...whats the difference?

Trying to understand your post..are you saying "brown people go back to whence you came from"is good political strategy?

Just a heads up, a podcast does not involve peas

forgot to post this the other day. On the last PMT they referenced their interview with Marrone..i am really interested in hearing this. On one hand, i think a brilliant move by Marrone to try to appeal to his young players On the other, i just can't see Marrone dealing with these guys. I cant see see McD doing this show either. POD usually drops about 1 AM, will listen early AM, post link, and give review.

as i said, that "part" of this base...he does this just way to much though to keep putting it off as "he Trumped It".

So i usually associate moneyline with taking the dog..that is pretty much only side I ever bet. But maybe oyu are saying you sometimes also play the favorite on the moneyline That being said, 65% winners is considered elite level win percentage, and i do mean elite, like almost impossible. Read these articles..says 70% is almost statistically impossible https://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/what-are-realistic-expectations-when-betting-on-the-nfl/ https://drbobsports.com/sports-betting-as-an-investment/ So as I say, if you are hitting 65%..quit your job and do that poop full time!

hmm..i agree somewhat and may be misinterpreting your response..are you saying the tweets by POTUS were not a veiled shout out to the part of his base that eats this up?

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/07/14/packers-increased-spending-takes-major-bite-out-of-profits-but-they-still-turned-a-profit/ (click on the video) Interesting..still say this may hurt the Pats pick game.

are you not saying you hit 65% winners? Are are you saying for every $1000 you bet, you lose 350?

so just turned on recording..man those dudes atat the pro turny sucked, and i see this will be nothing but a Romo and Steph slurp fest...too bad edit..and JT

sure as hell hope you have made betting the Bills your full time job...if i could hit 65 % winners i would be a rich man !

cool, can you see if someone can get me a couple too?

well, the Bills line is now at 7 wins..but standard vig to get that at -110. When it was 6.5, you had to bet $170 to win $100..difference being now at 7 wins you push, paying the vig at and taking 6.5 you win at 7 wins

i have not wtached intently..the showed him all of 1, yes 1, shot..tee shot on the par 3 17th. Today i think they pair by start power...maybe tomorrow they have to show him. Think he is up to 4th now

ha, one of my faves. My son has a bunch of my old albums as wall art in his room, this is his favorite. And for a time, seemed liked they player Kleinhans once a year for a 3 or 4 year period...never missed em..always slept out at Central Tickets on Delaware to make sure we had fist 5 rows at worst