EC-Bills

Uh, this rant is related to the article how? Hey look, a mention of Haliburton. Now there's something you don't see everyday. FYI, Haliburton was geting no-bid contracts during Clinton's terms.

I know. Just being a wiseass. Sorry

You're such a goverment apologist.

May was a fun month for you apparently...

Maybe he was referring to Bib...

Happy B-Day, Dean!

Okay that's it. I have had enough of this crap. I don't know who you are, but I want the real JSP back pronto! None of this pacifist lovey dovey crap.

Wow. That's amazing. I didn't know the SSA would let you work remotely like that. Cool gig.

Oh you're not fooling anyone. We all know you would still do one.

I get 12 a year. Also get 24 days of vacation a year with rolloever to a max of 48days. Combining holidays, I get approx 35days of vacation a year. Gotta love working for a state university. One of the best welfare programs around

Maybe they are just liberally bigots?

Okay let's see if I get this straight here: Rightie's say Reagan was responsible for the economy boom in the 80's, but say Clinton was not responsible for the economic boom in the 90's. Lefties will say the opposite Last time I checked, the actions of the chairman of the fed reserve have more of an impact on the ecomomy as opposed to the particular economic philosophy the presidental incumbent may or may not have. In Carter's term, he appointed Paul Volcker to deal with the inflation issue (which started under LBJ). Volker pretty much got it under control into Reagan's first term. After that, Volker cut interest rates to release money into the economy and then boom, things took off. But like any cylcle, what goes up must come down. Greenspan got things under control and then things took off under Clinton's terms. So tell me again, how the president is responsible for an economy?

Exactly.

Which means it has no place on a board like this one. Please edit or remove your post. Otherwise I will have no choice but to file a formal complaint to the mods. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Loonies, regardless of which side they are on, trying to harm someone at a political event should be whacked in the head and prosecuted.

On this partricular issue, I do tend to lean towards the left. I prefer to think it's not all black and white when it comes to people going to planned parenthood. My wife has gone there for birth control. She also has been on the board of the local planned parenthood. Never once while she was on the board did anyone suggest they encourage more abortions to make money, like numbnut wacka was implying. Regarding you question on protesting, people have the right to a peacful protest. What I oppose is the types of protest that obstructs an individual's right to enter pp when these protesters have no clue on what that person is there for. Hope that helps clarify things.

As usual, you are so effin' stupid. Go back and listen to Rush and Ann so you will know what to say or think for next time.

Happy B-Day Senator!

Jdubs, Quester74, and EC-Bills

Yeah, welcome back old timer. Someone finally get around to replacing your batteries?