Ramius

The fact that you cannot comprehend them, and interpret them incorrectly doesnt validate them.

Why does it not surprise me that you want to see pictures of my junk?

Good post. Marv seemed to emphasize that the entire right side was a weakness this year. However, he does seem to be high on Brad Butler, as does OBD in general from the recent article. Plus, they think he can play both T or G. We'll probably bring in a bigger name G during FA. Regarding the draft, Marv also said that he is not very high on rookie OL's stepping in and making a difference. (may be speculation, but to me, that eliminates a 1st rounder on the O-line) Depending on who we bring in during FA, i see us drafting a 2nd, but more likely 3rd round pick on a T or G. This leaves butler, the rook, preston, penninton, and perhaps a vet battling to start on the right side, with peters-FA-fowler on the left.

Lets see. You seem enamored with blowjobs and another man's penis. You know what they say, If it looks like a rat and smells like a rat... Oh, how did you and your "friend" react to Tim Hardaway's comments?

Congrats, you're 0-10. It wasnt brought up because is simply isnt a big deal to OBD. The fans and jerry sullivan are making a mountain out of a molehill.

Wheres your wikipedia link to back this statement up?

I simply did what you have been doing. providing a useless link that does nothing to further my cause. No link that i post is going to cure your mathematical, biological, and economical ignorance.

Enzyte worked for Bob, why wouldnt it work for me?

The fact that you cant tell the difference in any given roll in a larger distribution, and 1 single solitary die roll, tells me all i need to know about your lack of fundamental math knowledge. Math link And there, i provided a link.

Theres a joke at my expense about 3.5 inches in there somewhere.

apparently i've stepped into the doom and gloom, marv is old and senile circle jerk.

This might be insulting if you had even the slightest clue about what you are trying to discuss. But you dont, and all you've done in make your self like look an ass that cant comprehend basic math and stats, like usual. Lets try this again. The average/expected individual die roll over the course of n rolls (n > 1) will be 3.5 There is no average/expected die roll for n = 1 rolls of a die. Its an even distribution.

And you still dont get it.

I heard that it was in regards to selling out home games in december. Apparently they are giving away a raffle ticket for a romantic date with Hulk Hogan with every seat purchased.

Always have to be the elistist, huh? Throwing big words and such. I'll stick to being called an "arrogant ****". (hell, later on, my girlfriend told me that i came across as that when we first met)

The problem comes with reading comprehension, and an actual factual understanding of a concept, something HA is incapable of. All he can do is spit out wikipedia quotes that he doesnt even begin to attempt to comprehend. Tom's post a little bit ago explained things fairly well. The problem comes in when you try to treat a die like it a continuous variable, when in fact it is discrete. An expected value would be the most likely value you'd get by rolling a die. In rolling a die, you get a flat line distribution of all possible outcomes. rolling a 1 = a 2 = 3 = 4 = 5 = 6. So how is 3.5 the expected outcome? Its the AVERAGE, not the expected. There is NO expected value for rolling 1 die, because all 6 possibilities have an equal chance of being rolled. (1/6) Case in point: I have a die with sides cat, dog, bird, mouse, horse, and pig. Whats the expected outcome for THAT die? mouse.5? Things DO make sense when rolling multiple die, however. If i roll 2 dice, i get a distribution of possible outcomes, where the most likely (highest percentage) outcome is 7. (6/36) So 7 is the expected outcome for a roll of 2 dice. Also, it IS possible to roll a 7 by rolling 2 die. But you cant just say that since 7 is expected for 2 die, then 3.5 is the expected for 1 die, because 1 die does not have the same distribution as rolling 2 die. Mathematically, if you roll a die thousands of times, and calculate the AVERAGE value of each die roll, you will get 3.5. Thats a mathematical definition of average. By rolling a die multiple times, you've turned a set of discrete variables into a system of continuous variables. But you cannot back extrapolate that onto 1 die roll. 1 roll has equal probabilities of getting a 1,2,3,4,5,or 6. Therefore it has no "expected" value, and you cannot claim that the "expected roll" is 3.5, and that any other roll is "error". This level of reading comprehension and basic understanding of mathematical concepts is what gets HA in trouble with his each and every post.

a stiff drink and/or rubbing one out puts me to sleep everytime. (especially when #7 is not well received, as you said)

There was an article not too long ago on ESPN i think, with the new franchise tag #'s, but i cant seem to find it. LB was in the 7 million range.

Shhhh! Seeing that the Raiders actually had a decent defense requires a level of depth to a thought. How often is that seen here? Its much easier to see the raiders went 2-14 so obviously they suck everywhere.

Remember, this IS coming from someone who consistently quotes wikipedia, while at the same time discrediting thousands of published scientists and journals, because they prove him wrong.

So whats the expected value of a die with sides cat, dog, squirrel, rabbit, horse, and goat?

Yup, i also picture his dad tucked away in a basement, "Beautiful Mind" style, desperately trying to roll a 3.5 on a die.

How the hell do you use a dollar coin at a strip club?

I'm be surprised if arizona didnt make an effort to trade up to grab thomas. Solidifying their line would make them an awfully dangerous team.

You roll a 3.5 yet?