RI Bills Fan

Bills Sabres Red Sox Celtics I'm old enough to remember '64 & '65 so it's just the Sabres

Romo did most of his damage after one of the Giants starting corners left the game with an injury. And I'll take our corners over the Giants corners any day all day.

It's Otto Graham, and IMHO the GOAT QB discussion starts with him, Sammy Baugh, Johnny Unitis, & Bart Starr. The rest of what you said I agree with, provided you acknowledge that any attempt to equate Cassel to Young will be ridiculed and mocked mercilessly.

There are a few arguments for keeping Montana out of the top spot. Graham, Unitis, Baugh, Marino, Elway, & Farve are some that come to mind. If the discussion turns to keeping Brady out of the top spot a few more names can be added to that list. Including the Manning Brothers, Aikman, Fouts, & even Bradshaw.

Multiple Superbowl starts by QB's Terry Bradshaw 4-0 100% Joe Montana 4-0 100% Troy Aikman 3-0 100 % Bart Starr 2-0 100% Jim Plunkett 2-0 100% Eli Manning 2-0 100% Ben Rothlesburger 2-1 66% Bob Greise 2-1 66% Tom Brady 3-2 60% Then there's these guys: Dan Marino Otto Graham Sammy Baugh Peyton Manning John Elway Steve Young Johnny Unitas Dan Fouts Tom Brady might make the top ten, But greatest of all time? Nope, not even close.

WR Kamar Aiken OL Mark Asper LB Tank Carder OL James Carmon WR Marcus Easley DE Robert Eddins DT Jarron Gilbert DB Isaiah Green

The unintentionally hilarious question of the day award goes to... (drum roll)... Rob! Thanks for playing!

The fact that you can make a statement like this with (I assume) a straight face and not recognize just how ironic it is, provides the perfect illustration as to why I find this forum absolutely hillarious.

Pete Gogolak? Tom Dempsey?

Nah, it's more fun to snipe when you say something particularly stupid. But it has to be something other than your normal stupid because I have no desire to rack up 100,000 posts in a single week.

Nobody believes anything you say, now. And you think an obviously idiotic statement like that will help your credibility, Timeshare?

That's almost 3rdlng level stupid.

Ya know, I have to give you a little respect, four years ago you told the board that you would spend the next four years making the libs whining about Bush look good in comparison to you. You Sir, are a man of your word. You did (and are still doing) exactly what you said you would. Congrats! P.S. The comment was directed at the turnabout in arguments for or against a candidate, not at any particular candidate.

Wasn't Bush II being a guy most people would like to have a beer with because he was supposedly a regular guy one of his selling points?

You've been owned by so many people in this thread alone that you should change your screen name to "Timeshare."

Keep Digging 3RD! Keep digging, China's down there somewhere!

Now see, There you go again. I did read the thread. You started by posting a link to a badly written POS article blaming Arron Sorkin for a bunch of asinine tweats he had nothing to do with. Then in post 16 you tried to change the focus to something Chris Rock purportedly tweated and started accusing various people of "hating America." The majority of the rest of the thread is posters bithch slapping you, laughing at you, and in general agreeing that you are far and away the current douche bag champion of PPP. But we understand, Moe, we understand.

This one... Quite accurate if you ask me. And once again you place your complete lack of reading comprehension on display for all to see. Please just quit while you're behind. Even you must be embarrassed by now, George. Do your own homework, Sue!

And now Shemp is heard from. The thing I agree with most is Tom's last discription of you. FWIW I didn't bother to read that last cut & paste nonsense you put up. A glance told me it was a big pile of horse manure not worth my (or anyone's) time to wade through. Now I know all three of you stooges are seriously reading comprehension challenged but please, try really really hard to decipher what I type in the next paragraph. My statement was in response to one single statement, purportedly tweeted by Chris Rock, and was meant to convey the simple idea that given ths history of the USA, the single greatest nation on the face of the earth, it is (if the person reading the statement has a slight modicum of reading comprehension and a minimal amount of empathy for his or her fellow Americans) possible to understand that some people may see things from a different perspective than you or I see them. BUT that different perspective doesn't necessarially mean that that person "Hates America." Is that too hard for you three stooges to understand?

This is like arguing with some alternate universe version of the three stooges. And you must be Larry. I'm not desperate for anything. I just find it easy to understand how different holidays effect differnt segments of our society in different ways depending on the history of that segment.

No but you're jumping in to support the clown who did. Where were you on July 4th 1776? Where was your Grandfather? Do the facts of history only count when you like them? Like it or not what he says about slavery is true. Independance Day for our Country is and always will be July 4th. However Independence Day for a certain segment of our citizens is Jan 1st. I'm not positive what GFYM means, nor do I much care, but if it's what I suspect it is then you've just proven how big of an idiot you actually are.

On January 1 1863 (AKA Emancipation Day) President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclimation via Executive Order. That was the first day in the history of the good old US of A that 100% of people born with Melanin enriched skin were able to (theoretically) fully enjoy the benifits of FULL citizenship. It's an easy concept. You're not required to agree with him but that doesn't make him an "America Hater" or a "whiney kitty." Your response does however pretty much make you sound like a Sniveling Biatch.

I've become convinced that 3rd is an updated version of George. RIO can't touch this guy.

I was 15 then. The first game I went to was the Jets game in 68. I think I watched the highlights of the Cincy game at my Grandfather's house in Blasdell. No clear memory of it but I watched most away games with him. Your post brought back so many memories of him. He loved the Bills and it rubbed off on me.

It seems to be an interesting universe you inhabit. Does it touch on ours at other points or is this message board your only point of contact with the real world? Just for the record, laughing at the ironic hypocrisy of your posts does not constitute agreement or disagreement with any third party point of view. Now, I realize that any attempts at conversation with you are hampered by the language barrier (I speak American English, while you apparently speak some weird extra-universal variant of Words Made Up By Dr. Seuss) but I would appreciate it if you tried really, really, hard to grasp this simple concept: The repetitive repetition of obviously false statements does not magically transform them into true statements. And the idea that you feel qualified to question my (or anyone's) love of America based on an arbitrary standard that exists only in the vast emptiness of your largely unused mind is both vastly amusing and semi-disturbing.