Homelander

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=How+did+Trump+Musk+cuts+impact+the+National+Weather+Service https://apnews.com/article/national-weather-service-layoffs-trump-doge-a65360a1eb2500b7d47c9c966e383f4a?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=share https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/weather-service-noaa-cuts-houston-hurricane-20370241.php?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/30/trump-cuts-noaa-hurricane-forecasting?CMP=share_btn_url

Oh, this is rich you treat Juanita Broaddrick like gospel, but can’t be bothered to research DOGE? Do your own homework, or is everyone lying to you?

ETTD - quite literally, and in real time.

You really cannot make this up.

“I only have 35 posts so I can’t possibly be MAGA” defense. Cute. Almost as cute as the TDS jab - straight out of the MAGA starter pack. The only thing more predictable than your victim act is the desperate need to prove you’re not what you’re so obviously acting like. @BillsFanNC VPN alert.

lmao

WEI

You’re right about one thing: civil conversation is good. But let’s not pretend you’re just offering a benign “opinion” here. You’re framing Canada as somehow taking advantage of the US - despite the US being the one who unilaterally tore up trade deals, started tariff wars, and spends more on defense not out of charity, but to maintain global influence. The US-Canada relationship is one of the most balanced and mutually beneficial on earth. Our trade is near perfectly reciprocal. Canadian tourists and part-time residents who typically pour $20+ billion into the US economy every year - especially in places like Florida, Arizona, and yes, Western New York. To act like Canada is freeloading is both factually wrong and rooted in a tired, MAGA-style grievance narrative that refuses to recognize the reality of international partnerships. And on NATO: the 2% guideline isn’t a bill it’s a goal. Canada fights, bleeds, and dies alongside US troops in every major conflict. They’ve been there from Normandy to Kandahar. So, spare me the selective outrage. You’re entitled to your opinions, but not to misrepresentations dressed up as concern. The irony is you moved to a state that’s now overwhelmed because of the very policies MAGA types cheer - low taxes, weak planning, and deregulated sprawl - and now you want to blame “outsiders” instead of looking inward. That’s not logic. That’s deflection. And finally, yes - your random response to me came after I praised Canadians for being good people to the US LGBTQ community. That clearly struck a nerve, probably because the party you support has spent years telling you to hate those people. Talk about lacking intellect and maturity.

Dana Loesch attended St. Louis Community College at Meramec before transferring to Webster University, where she studied journalism. She ultimately left Webster without earning a degree after becoming pregnant and starting her family. lmao

Any updates?

You can always count on these geniuses to spew pure nonsense, every single time. Per Grok The National Weather Service (NWS), a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), experienced significant layoffs in 2025 as part of broader federal workforce reductions. Based on available information, the number of NWS employees let go varies across reports but can be summarized as follows: Initial Layoffs (February 2025): Approximately 800 probationary NOAA employees were laid off on February 27, 2025, with estimates suggesting around 375 of these were NWS employees, as the NWS had about 375 probationary staff at the time. Some sources indicate that not all probationary employees were let go, but specific numbers spared were unclear. Total Staff Reductions: By May 2025, reports indicated the NWS had lost around 550 to 600 employees due to a combination of layoffs, early retirements, and deferred resignations. This figure includes the initial February cuts and subsequent departures, representing about 10% of the NWS workforce. Additional Context: Some of the initial terminations were rescinded after a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order, reinstating some probationary employees, though many were placed on administrative leave and not immediately returned to work. This created uncertainty about the exact number of permanent layoffs. In summary, the NWS saw approximately 550–600 employees let go by mid-2025, with around 375 initially affected in February, though some reinstatements and ongoing retirements complicate the precise count. For the most accurate and updated figures, checking official NOAA or NWS statements or recent congressional reports would be necessary, as the situation evolved with reinstatements and new hires (e.g., 126 new positions authorized by June 2025).

Funny how you "forgot" the community note. Nothing screams desperation like cherry-picking your own propaganda This image was not taken in California, or anywhere in the United States for that matter. The image originates from Brazil. The OP is being misleading by stating “this was CA under Newsom” implying the image was in California, when it was in Brazil.