Joe Ferguson forever

no mention of his statement on fox. don't know about Epoch times.

Nope. Even these far right senators understand what this is about. Now call them RINO's... https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/video/roger-wicker-john-kennedy-trump-putin-digvid been thinking this for years. or that they have kompromat...but seriously, what info on his debauched history could be worse than what we already know?

well, the difference is that 41 virologists co authored the peer reviewed journal article and 1 authored the NYT op ed. "We are grateful for important and insightful discussion with Drs. Florence Débarre (CNSR, Sorbonne-Université, France), Kristian Andersen (Scripps Research Institute), Ralph Baric (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), Michael Worobey (University of Arizona), Stacey Schultz-Cherry (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital), Anice Lowen (Emory University), and Michael Imperiale (University of Michigan) that informed and enriched this commentary." The fact that the authors had discussions with dissenting scientists is a point in their favor. They wanted to hear opposing view points. They clearly believe that the question of the origin of the virus is not settled science. That's the consensus. The fact that those with opposing opinions allowed an acknowledgement also supports the view that the question is unsettled. You reject even that. I'm done wasting my time on you.

Your ignorance is astounding. When you’re not spouting absolute nonsense about a nonexistent meta analysis, you’re misidentifying the respected journal named virology. Stop embarrassing yourself. You’re way out of your lane.

41 Virologists formally disagree with Dr Chan. btw, she was not faculty at Harvard as suggested by @Motorin'. She was a post doc. It's a compelling read and thoroughly referenced rebuttal of Dr Chan's thesis. And they published it in a journal, not the NYT. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406950/

you have 65,000 posts appearing day and night. Your practice must be very, very slow....or nonexistent. stop the charade.

your obstinance is proof enough..,.

yes, you refused to participate in an EKG reading competency test with me also. I know I'm competent. Any anesthesiologist should be as well. Re credentials, put black tape over your name and license number on your framed license, take a photo and no personal info will be disseminated. The state symbol and seal will suffice as proof. As I've stated before, it's illegal to misrepresent yourself as a physician.

I’ve offered multiple times. A pic of license or board certification with name and number blacked out. He repeatedly has refused to offer is still there.

Shouldn’t u be prepping for your cases? Most anesthesiologists start very early.

Firstly, there is no perfectly safe drug. Just ask your compatriot here who refuses pi’s for a precancerous caused by reflux. Secondly, a paper was published in June 2020, not a “ mention”. There was broad skepticism. Yet you jumped in head first.since there was no known treatment, hell why not try bleach? If by some freak of academia someone actually gave you an MD, it should be rescinded. Your takes on covid are cavalier and overflowing with hubris.

Nope. Wrong again. And you loved this drug for Covid. Another great example of junk science and the fools that buy it. And you’re not even a little bit ashamed try June 2020 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/19/1038369557/ivermectin-anti-vaccine-movement-culture-wars

yes, that was before the tariffs and the draconian cuts in sympathetic government employees. And many (most) of the disenfranchised voted for trump. We'll watch and see, ok?

sure , dude. until they get really hungry yet fed up with the orange pos.

that's what i thought. none at the ready cuz there isn't a reputable link, dark one. are you just another female pseudonym for a male maga fascst regularly posting here under another nom de guerre? most females seem to have the sense to avoid the place. but the Irish are known for their feistiness and their drinking.

Please provide a link, Ciara.

ya know, we live in the wealthiest country in the world. And citizens line up for free food to keep them alive. Many still have no health insurance. the current administration will make this much worse. And those lining up or soon to be lining up, cheer it. Lunacy but that's where we are. People unconsciously voting against their own interests. I guess that's part of the reason they are where they are and why the country is where it is.

sure. It's nether what you said nor what you're currently doing. Be better.

I volunteer at one. It's busy. And we have lots of ramen noodles. In the summer, there's a volunteer master gardener that grows great veg to distribute. Never heard anyone there complain that she's a liberal.

I asked what your purpose is. That's what you came up with. That's f'n foolish and not very rewarding. If it is, it's a sorry life you lead.

if I required your help, I would be in serious trouble. Re helping you, one can't fix stupid. But I enjoy making you look foolish.

Sure, Democrats only hold manual labor jobs...shovel, dig, carry. No purpose. What's your purpose?

Yeah, that's going to get worse after the tariffs hit. Ramen noodles get boring pretty quickly.

no thanks. Have an excellent financial advisor whose tax advice and steady, strong returns are just what I need. But I play around with he market in small bits. LLY and TLRY were my big hitters. TLRY was an excellent example of investor sentiment outweighing fundamentals. no reason for it to ever go over 100 but it did. Now back to 1$. I sure don't try to time shorts tho. That's serious gambling.

sadly, it could happen. and that would make you happy. so f'in strange.