Joe Ferguson forever

youy are so personally invested in this. you can't bear to think trump is fallible. When it became clear Hunter f'ed up, most liberals said "go get him". Same with the garage files. See the difference?

look it up. why? this is one of those "tell me what i'm thinking" questions....not gonna happen. we are polar opposites when it comes to thought.

3% of goods shipped thru the suez canal is US. 40% eU. that's what vance was bit2hing about.

did you personally benefit from the raid on the houthis? did that action make you great again?

but Franco Depuy on FBN (fascist boys net) said everything written, including vance telling everyone how much he despised bailing out the europeans, was unclassified. everyone already knows trump wants out of NATO, so no big secret news...,

it's not satire. he's not interested in humor. but he honestly doesn't see a problem here where targets and tactics were exposed. And the contempt for our allies is on full display. perhaps that wasn't accidental.

I won't pay anything. cuz I don't trust a one of ya. but let's do an EKG contest. that'll be fun.

wow. thinned skin tonight. this is the norm from the far righties here. one reprobate even calls me "quack" while pretending to be a molecular biologist. It's an anonymous board. speculating on actual identity is part of the game....

stands to reason that Hegseth leaked the Musk China meeting. Then he remembered he didn't need to because he's already sent to him on an unprotect5ed message...

OK. I've been to a wonderful;l wedding. Gives me strength. Gives me hope. Everything else can disappear.

for something that supposedly wasn't going to happen, the pentagon is going to great lengths to stop a similar future leak https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/22/politics/defense-department-polygraph-tests-leaks/index.html

it's complicated...my feeling is if one is referring only to Africans, it is often considered derogatory. If applied to all nonwhites, it's a descriptive acceptable term. But I'm surprised that you take issue.... https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/08/colored-person-versus-person-of-color-how-does-society-decide-which-racial-terms-are-acceptable.html

people of color=colored people. perfectly acceptable terminology. just left the WW2 national museum. echoes of racial purity for trump's America. seems as a species, we've learned little. A sobering experience.

So you think it’s a good idea? And simultaneously deporting colored people

importing more white maga's on false pretenses https://apnews.com/article/trump-white-refugee-afrikaner-south-africa-0fbca411470d3b439886cabc12c7600d

Mad men was either a good tv show or the current US administration. So you weren't CIA. Didn't think so. I'd have more respect if you were. What I mean is that many of your compatriots find this stuff conspiratorial. and you don't object. cuz you're not interested. except in musk who you see as benign despite obvious conflict of interests especially regarding global military calculus. you're analytical til you're not.

why? splain...cuz you were a pilot? or were you CIA? C'mon. you can say. All that's coming out because trump wants the "deep state" revealed. but now you're a virginia wine producer. musta heard some great stuff in the tasting room. but you're not interested...

yes, but he's a teacher and a child psychologist and a prolific poster on a Bills message board. Those credentials are indeed impressive. Too bad about his syntax and grammar... and transparency? the courts thankfully, intervene again (isn't it weird how primarily financial publications are worried?) https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2025/03/11/federal-judge-rules-doge-must-disclose-records-about-its-operation-to-comply-with-federal-transparency-law/ losers don't care...

so, no more expertise on this subject than say, someone like me....and less than the WSJ and NYT

you didn't mention deep knowledge of the workings of the highest levells of the pentagon under trump and hegseth nor the latitude trump has or will show musk. those would seem salient in this discussion. I'm confident the reporters from NYT and WSJ do or at a minimum know sources that do. hence the threat to punish the"leakers'.

always the showman. and always without real substance. he could have just said "I don't know". https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-cant-answer-when-peter-doocy-asks-simple-question-who-killed-kennedy/ "You know, when a lot of time goes by. But with the Kennedy files, in particular, they were going crazy on them. I don’t think there’s anything. that’s earth-shattering, but you’ll have to make that determination."

and pizza gate or any of the other Q nonsense posted all over this forum don't meet those criteria? I know, you have no interest...you're a selective do gooding, fact checker. Does the "deep state" interest you? plenty of posts about it in virtually every aspect of our govt including the military. and in this case you have no more proof of your concrete belief that the story has no merit than mine, that it might.

unconventional academic route...but who can argue with your apparent success?

I've never seen you question any of the myriad far right conspiracy theories posted here. You know, pizzagate and the like...but a story about an unelected "advisor" with massive influence and access is too far fetched.

I think you mean Vance country. But many of those folks have never left their home county.