Joe Ferguson forever

All those years and he still looks the same ugly cossack.

Niagara Bill seems stable as a rock Cool how you made that vile load of bs appear to be from Newsweek at first glance. Good try, Grasshopper

fascinating stuff. It's a fair assumption that the psychiatric characteristics of double agents are similar to those politicians who might sell out their countryhttps://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Observations-on-Double-Agent.pdf "Experience sugests that some people who take to the double agent role-perhaps a majority of willing ones, in fact have a number of traits in common with the con-man. Psychiatrists describe such persons as sociopaths. From the point of view of the double agent operation, here are their key traits:" "They are unusually calm and stable under stress but cannot tolerate routine or boredom. They do not form lasting and adult emotional relationships with other people because their attitude toward others is exploitative. They have above-average intelligence. They are good verbalizers- sometimes in two or more languages. They are skeptical and even cynical about the motives and abilitiesy a ep ynic of others but have exagerated notions about their own competence. Their reliability as agents is largely determined by the extent to which the case officer's instructions coincide with what they consider their own best interests. They are ambitious only in a short range sense: they want much and they want it now. They do not have the patience to plod toward a distant reward. They are naturally clandestine and enjoy secrecy and deception for its own sake." Source: CIA

nah. he drinks the kool aid as fast as he invents a profession.

Perhaps after 1 of 6 bankruptcies: https://www.thoughtco.com/donald-trump-business-bankruptcies-4152019. or perhaps helping him (or funneling money) through deutsche bank, his largest and longest creditor? https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-secret-ugly-breakup-with-deutsche-bank-revealed-2022-10 who knows. It's not like the KGB hasn't used large sums of money to influence politicians before. 2 rooms, 3 docs again today?

Dude, we already now that you're human feces incarnate. No need for you to confirm it. 2 major reasons: 1. they're morons 2. they're in a cult

In the choice between "owning" the libs and siding against empowering a murderous, evil tyrant who threatens world peace, you choose the former. I'm sure your Religion and Ethics professors at St Bonaventure would be proud.

as the maga's say, why don't you move there?

No, I don't find it "funny" if that mean strange or incomprehensible. In the middle of a country's existential war , I find it totally appropriate.

did you read the bbc piece? can you read? Ukrainians support it by a much larger majority than you fascists voted in trump by.

of his lifetime of lies, this is one of the worst and most impactful. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9814k2jlxko

53! duh. Wicker is chair of the Armed services committee. No one has polled the remaining R's as far as I know. Collins has said much the same. So you disagree with wicker, Kennedy and Collins.

no mention of his statement on fox. don't know about Epoch times.

Nope. Even these far right senators understand what this is about. Now call them RINO's... https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/video/roger-wicker-john-kennedy-trump-putin-digvid been thinking this for years. or that they have kompromat...but seriously, what info on his debauched history could be worse than what we already know?

well, the difference is that 41 virologists co authored the peer reviewed journal article and 1 authored the NYT op ed. "We are grateful for important and insightful discussion with Drs. Florence Débarre (CNSR, Sorbonne-Université, France), Kristian Andersen (Scripps Research Institute), Ralph Baric (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), Michael Worobey (University of Arizona), Stacey Schultz-Cherry (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital), Anice Lowen (Emory University), and Michael Imperiale (University of Michigan) that informed and enriched this commentary." The fact that the authors had discussions with dissenting scientists is a point in their favor. They wanted to hear opposing view points. They clearly believe that the question of the origin of the virus is not settled science. That's the consensus. The fact that those with opposing opinions allowed an acknowledgement also supports the view that the question is unsettled. You reject even that. I'm done wasting my time on you.

Your ignorance is astounding. When you’re not spouting absolute nonsense about a nonexistent meta analysis, you’re misidentifying the respected journal named virology. Stop embarrassing yourself. You’re way out of your lane.

41 Virologists formally disagree with Dr Chan. btw, she was not faculty at Harvard as suggested by @Motorin'. She was a post doc. It's a compelling read and thoroughly referenced rebuttal of Dr Chan's thesis. And they published it in a journal, not the NYT. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406950/

you have 65,000 posts appearing day and night. Your practice must be very, very slow....or nonexistent. stop the charade.

your obstinance is proof enough..,.

yes, you refused to participate in an EKG reading competency test with me also. I know I'm competent. Any anesthesiologist should be as well. Re credentials, put black tape over your name and license number on your framed license, take a photo and no personal info will be disseminated. The state symbol and seal will suffice as proof. As I've stated before, it's illegal to misrepresent yourself as a physician.

I’ve offered multiple times. A pic of license or board certification with name and number blacked out. He repeatedly has refused to offer is still there.

Shouldn’t u be prepping for your cases? Most anesthesiologists start very early.

Firstly, there is no perfectly safe drug. Just ask your compatriot here who refuses pi’s for a precancerous caused by reflux. Secondly, a paper was published in June 2020, not a “ mention”. There was broad skepticism. Yet you jumped in head first.since there was no known treatment, hell why not try bleach? If by some freak of academia someone actually gave you an MD, it should be rescinded. Your takes on covid are cavalier and overflowing with hubris.

Nope. Wrong again. And you loved this drug for Covid. Another great example of junk science and the fools that buy it. And you’re not even a little bit ashamed try June 2020 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/19/1038369557/ivermectin-anti-vaccine-movement-culture-wars

yes, that was before the tariffs and the draconian cuts in sympathetic government employees. And many (most) of the disenfranchised voted for trump. We'll watch and see, ok?