Let's concentrate on one study at a time. The hot/cold study was published in an obscure branch of Lancet dealing with population health. And yes, Lancet's main journal is considered among the best and most widely read medical journals in the world. This particular article in this particular journal will be read by very few people except scientists in the field who can easily understand the data as presented and will read it critically. I suspect you also understand the meaning of the data but care not to acknowledge it. It's not intended to mislead the public but to inform the science community. Someone had to look very hard to find a tiny detail in a table that bears no impact on the findings of the study. Stop being obtuse. You look for what you hope to find and when you don't find it, you amplify some trivial data presentation method. If only you were as diligent in your interest in info on trump's crimes and how he devised them...Even if the authors were trying to mislead (and they weren't) it's nothing compared to the lies trump and MAGA's spout every day. Everything is not a conspiracy but Jan 6 was.