-
Posts
10,537 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Joe Ferguson forever
-
https://www.prri.org/press-release/survey-four-in-ten-americans-are-susceptible-to-authoritarianism-but-most-still-reject-political-violence/ 25% of Americans support it. Why? My guess is that they support authoritarians that they believe will take their side on issues. Also, as demographics change, they believe winning elections for far right politicians becomes very difficult. Thoughts?
-
Trump 2024?
Joe Ferguson forever replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
What makes the MAGAs here so confident? https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4947464-harris-leads-trump-new-tracking-survey/ -
Elon Musk appreciation thread
Joe Ferguson forever replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-jokes-church-someone-204856598.html The best you can say is they're open about their desire for her assassination. Why are they so worried about a dumb colored woman? -
"I think it's fair game to question anyones credentials here especially if they use those credentials to imply expertise on a topic. Let's specify which credentials we are talking about and have at it. The remainder of your longwinded post is nonsense. I don't need to verify whether she worked at McDonalds. It's not important to me. In fact, it's distracting from really important issues like living wages and I suspect that's trump's goal. Seemingly, it's important to you. So spend your time trying to prove she manufactured this job. It won't make a bit of difference in the election but you'll please all the maga's on the board if you're successful". For clarity, let's number your assertions 1 thru 6. Regarding 1 and 4; appeals to authority can be valid if the veracity of the authority is confirmed. Questioning that veracity is questioning the foundation of the argument made. It's not an attack on the man unless done without cause. There's much cause. #2. ibid. #3. your response was your argument. I'm clearly attacking your argument and not your person. It was long winded. self evident. #5 is a flight of ideas based on the false premises of 1-4 #6. all for living wage for everyone. anyone that works 40 hours a week should be able to afford a roof, food and essentials.
-
I don't know that she did lie. There's a spectrum of importance of false or allegedly false statements from candidates for me. Part time work history doesn't compare to lying about who won a presidential election. Volume matters as well. trump lied 30,000 times as president and the lies are well documented. So why are all of those unimportant to you, yet the question of fast food employment is critical?
-
I think it's fair game to question anyones credentials here especially if they use those credentials to imply expertise on a topic. Let's specify which credentials we are talking about and have at it. The remainder of your longwinded post is nonsense. I don't need to verify whether she worked at McDonalds. It's not important to me. In fact, it's distracting from really important issues like living wages and I suspect that's trump's goal. Seemingly, it's important to you. So spend your time trying to prove she manufactured this job. It won't make a bit of difference in the election but you'll please all the maga's on the board if you're successful.
-
nope. any time before October 84 or when she was less than 20 years old asa of that date. i think she said she was a freshman or sophomore in college. Most likely, that would have been 40+ years ago. amazing that this is a higher priority to you than if trump had someone take the SAT's for him to get into Columbia. trump could settle this by asking the alleged cheat (by trump's closest family members) to publicly deny it. He hasn't
-
nope. not for employment over 40 years ago: "Contact the Social Security Administration to request a copy of your work history and dates. You will need Form 7050, which is available online. Check the Detailed Earnings Information box on the form. You can request information dating back to 40 years; however, your fee depends on the number of years the search includes."
-
fancy words for an ad hominem attack. It's your style and it's sleazy. As I said recently, your use of fallacies in arguments is abundant and intellectually dishonest. It's so fine honed, it's almost as if you were trained in the techniques. I did work at holiday inn as a dishwasher for about year. Mostly weekends. Dried egg yolks are the worst. But in regards to my point, it doesn't matter if I did or not. Many people worked part time in jobs in the NF tourist industry back then. Very few, if any could prove it. Regarding your contention of the electorates trust of Harris, trump's childish stunt did nothing to change that. Stupid people still trust him. Smart people trust but verify her statements
-
Trump 2024?
Joe Ferguson forever replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Latrobe right? Never been. Looks nice on TV. He had a reputation as a fine man. trump is cheap as shite. -
-
Trump 2024?
Joe Ferguson forever replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Is this all true????😅