Billz4ever

You have to look at the taxes and fees these companies charge you above and beyond what they tell you your plan costs. My most recent Youtube TV bill, the taxes were $5.38. My last cable bill before dropping cable, there's a broadcast TV fee, which was $19.35, an Regional Sports fee, which was $9.10, and finally tax, which was another $10.25 and I had no additional boxes, which they charge you like another $10 bucks each/month. So that's another almost $40 bucks/month on top of what they tell you your plan costs. Ridiculous. With YouTube TV, you're just paying the tax.

Have you tried a VPN as a workaround?

The funniest part is that he wants to act like the cable companies aren't also raising their rates all the time too, so even if YouTube TV does periodically, the cable companies are still going to be more expensive regardless.

Oh, you mean like cable already does their cable boxes and each additional one you need? With the base plan, YouTube TV give you 3 concurrent streams. That would cost you like $30 bucks extra on cable with paying for boxes. Espn+ and Disney+ aren't free for cable subscribers either, so I don't know why you're trying to make it sound like those fees apply to only cord cutters. And I would love to for you to provide a cable service that's currently cheaper than YouTube TV and has a comparable number of channels. Not to mention, like there's an extra $20 bucks tacked onto your cable bill in taxes and fees that aren't even metioned in what they tell you cable package costs. If your package is $100 bucks, what you're really paying is close to $120 to $125 with all the fees. Not to mention you get YouTube music included with that.

We have a brutal schedule next season, so 13 wins is going to be very hard to duplicate again in the first place.

Cincy owned us in the trenches on both sides of the ball and it showed. We couldn't get to Burrow or stop the run and Josh was repeatedly running for his life to escape the sack. In a nutshell, that was what decided the game and if we don't adequately address that this offseason, they will do it to us again.

I think Jeudy is a pretty good receiver. My only concern with him is his durability. He seems kind of injury prone to me. He's missed 9 games over the last 2 seasons.

I think it's abundantly clear Oliver hasn't lived up to what the team expected from him when they took him at #9 overall. Having said that, I think it would be difficult to find a team willing to take on his $11M salary going into this year. I think we're stuck with him for this year and we just have to hope for the best and that he has a breakout season in a contract year.

The Bills picked up his 5th year option. That money is fully guaranteed bud.

If he wasn't owed $11M maybe we get some team to bite, but that's a big price tag for a player who hasn't lived up to expectations.

Even if you cut Oliver, it still counts as dead cap. You're now saying we can just cut him, but in another breath say we can trade him? You're saying a guy we can just cut has trade value?

A stretch? Taking on an underperforming player owed $11M to accommodate Henry isn't a stretch. That's a pipe dream.

LMAO, if it weren't for Josh, this line looks even worse than it was.

That assumes Tennessee even wants Oliver. Why would they want an undersized, underperforming DT who's owed almost $11M dollars this year?

Beane just said in the presser they have about $9M to work with and that includes having to sign this year's draft class with that. How exactly are you getting Oliver's $$ off the books? Besides the cap issue, it's not like we don't still have issues to address on the O-line. If you're giving all our high draft picks away, how do you do that? I really hope you don't think signing Mc Govern and re-signing Boettger takes our line from dreadful to now good. This isn't a KC style approach. KC realized they had line issues a couple seasons ago and they addressed them.

Must be nice to have so much talent on your O-line you can't even use it all.

So if you're a Bills player you're supposed to lie? Funny thing is I bet Josh would say those guys are better because he's actually humble and knows he still has a lot to prove before he should be placed above those guys.

Which amazes me. Had he been their #1 all season, he's well over 1K yards. He had five 100-yd games, which was 4th best in the league. I wanted him here, but it wasn't meant to be.

I would love to unload Ed but can't see Tennessee wanting him or his salary this year.

That's what baffles me even more with the Bills strategy going into the playoff game. We already had a glimpse of it in the cancelled game, but Frazier seemed to proceed to go with the exact same game plan. The teams that take the short routes away or at least disrupt Cincy's timing give them fits because it forces Burrow to hold the ball longer and allows the pass rush to get home. And what did we do? We played well off their receivers and played right into their hands. The very opposite of what you should be doing against them. Those throws were there for Burrow all night long. So frustrating.

We could've had Foreman but for some reason it didn't seem like Beane really pursued. He'd have come cheap too. He signed with the Bears for $3M. I can't believe we couldn't do better than that if we tried. Plus, we had the advantage of being a contender.

As it's been said, the Bills need a bigger back. We need someone to contrast Cook, who can pound the rock, and can get those tough short yards. We don't need both Singletary and Cook. Foreman was the idea guy to fill that role and would've come cheap. I can't believe Beane wasn't all over that.

He's listed at 247, but I wouldn't be surprised if he's really over 250 now at all.

I think it should be a no-brainer they go with Foreman. I'm actually really surprised Carolina picked up Sanders, which mean they are moving on from Foreman or Foreman would be RB2. Foreman ran for 877 yds in their final 11 games, including five 100-yd games, which was good for 4th in all of football. And he did it all behind a line ranked 17th in run blocking per PFF.

With Miles Sanders leaving Philly, I think that makes the likelihood they will take Robinson at #10 skyrocket. With Carolina signing Sanders, that means it's all but certain Foreman is done there. I hope Beane is taking a serious look at him. 6'1" 236. Not going to get much bigger than that at RB unless you're talking Derrick Henry.