Billz4ever

If the Chiefs are willing to give up first round picks for CMC, good, let them. It will only hurt them in the long run.

Moore has huge money due next year.

But if you had the option wouldn't you like to have an enclosed stadium where weather isn't a factor for either team and you can just enjoy the game without freezing?

Now you're claiming QB'S like Marino couldn't make those throws? LMAO How many times did Brady play in Buffalo in the winter and beat us? Brady beat us 15 consecutive times. That's the equivalent of 7 and 1/2 seasons straight. How much do you think the Buffalo weather affected him? You mean the game where Mac Jones beat us in the wind? LMAO

How do you know that was the reason? That's you making an assumption. Looked to me like the safety took a bad angle. And using your same logic, at the end of the quarter, whether is now advantage Pit. It's a dumb argument since both teams play in it. You brought up Justin Tucker missing. That is you literally implying the Bills kicker would've made the kick that Tucker missed. If both Kickers have to deal with it then it's not an advantage for the Bills, brainiac. You're hopeless.

So you're crackpot theory says that Justin Tucker missed, but if it was the Bills kicker they would've made both? LMAO That would have to be your argument for the weather to be an advantage to the Bills. Do you even know how ridiculous you sound right now?

If you could, you'd have clearly done it by now. Fact is you can't. Period. You're really reaching now LMAO. Kickers? Hate to break it to you, but both Kickers would have to deal with the wind, so that's an utterly ridiculous attempt at trying to prove your stupid theory. On top of that, you really think Justin Tucker has never had to deal with wind before? LMAO And the fact he missed, that automatically means it was the wind, right? 😂😂🤣

Still no examples. Crackpot theory. I rest my case. This isn't Miami where one sideline is shades while the visitors bake and it's 30 degrees warmer. Imagine being so sure of something and arguing it over and over, yet you can't provide a single example of it. Not to mention, it shows a clear lack of faith in the talent of the team you claim to support if you want the weather to "hurt the other team". (But can't provide any examples of where that actually happened). Wait, you're claiming that was because of the wind and not Josh's skill? FYI, teams switch endzones at the end of each quarter, so one team never benefits from the wind the entire game. Josh can make that throw all day.

If that's not an admission you have no faith in your team I don't know what is and considering every super bowl is played in a location where the weather is not expected to be a factor, the Bills will have to be on an equal playing field as far as weather goes, which is unfortunate for you I guess.

You've been asked multiple time to provide examples of games where the weather directly contributed to us wining and being a detriment to the other team. You have yet to do it. That speaks for itself.

So once again, you have no faith in the talent of our team. You need mother nature to influence the outcome. How insulting. And besides that, it's a crackpot theory. You've been asked multiple times to provide examples of where the weather was the reason why we won and how it was an advantage to us. Unless I've missed it, you've still never done it.

Then you have no concept of economic development. Too cold for people yet they had the SB in Minneapolis, where it gets colder than Buffalo. And like I said, sounds like your goal here is simply to try and poo poo the idea rather than contribute anything constructive.

Why is that? It's a model that has been repeated proven all over the country for years, not just for Domes/retractable roofs. Large indoor venues in general.

And if Buffalo had a venue like this that could host events year round, Hotel chains would be falling all over themselves to build around it. This is already a well-established economic development model. And that article is now a decade old. Pretty sure that number for Buffalo has increased by itself anyway.

That makes no sense considering Josh on average attempts way more passes than Lamar does in the first place. Lamar only played in 12 games last year, so I'll use 2020 instead. Lamar had 382 attempts on the season. Josh had 572...nearly 200 more attempts. You've drawn conclusions not supported by the actual situation. That literally makes the case for a dome/retractable roof because then the State and County are getting more use out of it then rather than just sinking hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into an open air football stadium.

You said it was too cold, dude. I'm just going to disregard everything else after that since it was such a ridiculous comment. But you apparently also do not understand that if Buffalo were to have a venue like that, which could host events year-round, hotel chains would literally be falling all over themselves to build hotels around it.

Why do people keep saying this? This is a nonsensical argument. If Buffalo had a venue like that, which could host events year-round, more hotels would be built around it.

The state and the county are kicking in a combined $850M already. If the Pegula's wanted one, they could make it happen. Terry Pegula has a net worth of $6.7B.

This time? No, I don't believe so.

No, it's an open air stadium. There will be some protection from the elements with overhangs, but not like a dome or retractable roof.

Too cold? Come again? You do understand that's the purpose of an enclosed stadium, correct? Super Bowl LII between the Eagles and Pats was literally in Minneapolis @U.S. Bank Stadium, my guy. And you understand that having a venue where more events could be held in the cold season would lead to more hotels being built. It sounds like you're trying to find excuses simply to not have one rather than giving real, valid reasons.

You have no proof that it helped either. And FYI, you once again suggested it was the weather in Buffalo, not the talent of those team that was the reason we won. Insulting. We had players having to seek medical attention in Miami from the heat and had to come out of the game. Where have you ever seen the visiting team falling out because it was too cold or some other nonsense you are suggesting the imaginary weather advantage gives us here?

There's always those resistant to change and this is just another example. Nevermind what it would do for the community. It's always the nostalgia and letting go of something that actually works against our team in reality, but heaven forbid we decide that we don't need to freeze our butts off to watch a football game any longer. And not having the dome will ensure that more hotels aren't built. You have to start somewhere, fella. I don't think you even know what you're saying because what you just said above is saying it gives us an advantage (which it really doesn't). Hating the weather doesn't mean you can't play in it. 112 degrees in the sun on our sideline in Miami is an actual advantage. Hating the weather in Buffalo is not. If it's giving us an advantage that you say we need to keep, you're saying we need it to win. If you're saying we don't need it to win, then you should have no objection to a dome. It's pretty simple logic here.

Disagree. Just between the state and the county, they are kicking in $850M. If the goal going in was to build a dome, that would've been higher. You don't even realize what you're doing, but I find it pretty insulting to the HOFers and other players we've had come through here to suggest we need to the weather to be able to win, making it sound like we didn't have the talent on our teams to do it otherwise. Pretty sad actually.

Disagree. Considering what the Pegula's were able to talk the State into kicking in, they could've made it happen. Would've made the Pegula's open their wallet and pay more, but funding really isn't the issue. It's the desire to do it. Wait, so now you're suggesting we need to play outside so we have some imaginary advantage in order to win? LMAO I think we're still waiting for you to name the games we won specifically because we played outside in bad weather and it gave us the advantage. And FYI, the Super Bowl is always played in locations were it's assumed weather will not be a factor, so it's a true test of team vs team, not teams vs the weather.