Billz4ever

It means your offense couldn't put the ball in the endzone on multiple trips into fish territory when it was needed.

If he was great a catching the ball he'd be playing TE. Outside of the many frustrations that happened Sunday, that drop being one, Matt Milano is a standout on this defense and is some of the glue keeping them together during all these injuries.

They weren't all cooler. The game last year was within one degree of this year with the same humidity. The difference this year was the bills game planned to chew clock and their offense was on the field for almost the equivalent of 3 entire quarters. Last year they had the ball for 28 minutes. The Bills blew them out last year, so nobody cared. But if something is actually an unfair advantage, people should be making noise about it regardless of if they win or lose, which isn't the case. It's only a big deal now because we lost.

The hottest part of the day is 3 P.M. so moving to a 4 P.M. kickoff isn't much better. Would have to be a night game to really make a difference.

Depends on who's injured, but homefield in January cannot be discounted.

Would you prefer it if he had punched the wall one time and done and broke his hand?

Lighten up Francis. He was blowing off some steam and frustration. I'd rather him do it there than unintentionally take it out on the players and end up regretting it later.

Call it whatever you want. I personally liked his display of emotion. Showed me he's passionate about the game and cares about winning. I certainly prefer that over the nothing but constant clapping you get from McD and nothing else.

You're trolling, right?

Not sure when OBJ will be ready, but if we get more WR injuries, we are going to be hurting. He's looking more and more like a yes if Beane can swing it. Gabe didn't really look game ready yesterday either.

And the hits just keep on comin'.

Just in general, it feels like I've seen a big uptick in injuries happening all across the league so far this season. Hopefully the trend reverses itself, but so far, this year has been scary for a lot of players and teams, ours especially. Not sure what has changed or what could be causing it.

No, because the free kick (punt) can just as easily be shanked and go 20 yards or the punter can out kick the coverage and the receiving team can ripoff a nice return.

Needing a touchdown to win is a much tougher proposition than simply needing to get into field goal range. They had a minute and a half. Very doable.

Still don't get it. Like I said, Homers can't identify the hypocrisy in their argument. The conditions in last year's game were within ONE DEGREE of each other with the same humidity. What changed? The temp/humidity? Nope. As already stated they were almost as identical as identical can get. What changed is last year, the Bills rolled Miami. This year they struggled, couldn't put the ball in the end zone on multiple drives into fish territory and their offense was on the field for almost the equivalent amount of 3 entire quarters. Now the heat is to blame. Not how the Bills played in contrast to last year mind you, it was the heat. The heat is to blame and it's unfair. The fact homers are too homerish to see the utter ridiculousness in their line of thinking is absolutely incredible.

Wow, you really don't get it. Again, Bills play well, kick fin tail, you don't hear a peep about heat. Bills lose and the heat affects them because their offense is on the field for almost 3 quarters, now we can't have that. Sure sign of a homer is not recognizing the hypocrisy of their own argument.

Once again, proving my point. When the Bills win, crickets about heat. When they lose...wait, unfair, unfair!!! That is a homer attitude and homer excuse if I've ever seen one. And this board is full of homers, so the fact there are multiple people spouting homer nonsense, doesn't help you, nor does it prove you right. Just thought you should know, K?

Bad argument? My argument is bad? LMAO Your argument is to the effect of: the Bills smoked them quick last year, so it's OK. If we lose though like we did yesterday, now it's an unfair advantage. That is literally your argument. Too funny. Funny, it's most certainly is being used as an excuse, but claiming it's an unfair advantage rings hollow when the Bills went in there a smoked them in almost identical conditions last season. If literally the only difference is the Bills won last year and you heard crickets about heat, but now you're hearing it all over, it's definitely a homer excuse. I can't stand homer excuses even when it's for my own team.

Oh, so the fact the bills offense was on the field for nearly 3 quarters had nothing to do with it? It was all the "But the SHADE!" argument? Tell me, where was that "But the SHADE!" argument last year when the Bills beat them 35-0 when the temp was only different by one degree? Blocking ignorance as deep as yours brings a smile to my face.

Wrong, in Denver, the thin air impacts the vistors more than it does the home team because the home team's bodies have adjusted to having less O2. This is another physiological fact that you fail to grasp, just like heat acclimatization. Until you grasp some basic human physiological facts, you should probably stop talking because it's from a position of pure ignorance that you are. So when the Bills win 35-0 in the same temp, on the same field in the same sun, all good. When they lose, "But mua SHADE!!!" Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?

So what? I don't understand the point. Denver has an advantage too since they are more used to the thin air. Is every team in the NFL supposed to play in a dome? This is really the first time really ever heard Bills fans complain so much about the weather in Miami and I can guarantee if they'd won, you wouldn't hear 1/2 the complaining you do now. It's an easy crutch to try and blame the loss on, but when you only have to rewind to last season when the temp was 1 degree off what it was yesterday and the Bills smoked them, those complaints ring hollow and can easily be seen for what they are.

Your take: when the Bills beat them 35-0 in the same stadium a year ago in almost identical weather, I say nothing. If the Bills lose to them I will now blame it on the weather and it's not fair. Get out of here with that nonsense.

While true, it would've been an insanely long FG attempt or a hail mary, so can't really blame it on that.

No, it does not contradict. Both teams play in it. One team is simply used to it more than the other. Some stadiums are louder than others. Is that an unfair advantage too?

We did all see it and when you go in with a game plan to chew clock with a bunch of players not acclimatized to that heat and humidity, the outcome shouldn't have been a big surprise. The heat was a factor for the #1 reason being the bills players are not acclimatized to that heat and humidity, followed by #2 being they were on the field for 42 minutes of the game. Miami has to play in the same heat and humidity, but their bodies are more acclimatized to doing so. This is not some unfair advantage however considering the Bills wiped the field with them last year in nearly identical temp and humidity.