syhuang

Where is your sarcasm detecter today?

but...but...but... Roethlisberger has "it".

Only when clock is running.

I don't mind D has another lucky turnover. Luck or not, turnover is good.

<JP basher> Because Losman doesn't give D enough breath by throwing two quick touchdowns </JP basher>

<JP basher> It's always Losman's fault </JP basher>

Damn, I'm glad I start Evans in my fantasy team.

and this Notre Dame QB doesn't need an offensive line. Image a 6WR, 2TE, and 2 RB formation.

Ths answer is no if Quinn will definitely become a player like Manning or Palmer. However, because there's no guarantee that Quinn will be as good as Manning or Palmer in pro football, this question is meaningless. Case closed.

Stop it, you're making too much sense.

You words are not poor only when you OMIT the fact that regression toward mean is NOT caused by error. Regression toward mean is causd by sample and error being normally distributed.

here it is: link and link Poor choices of words, again?

How about this or this or this? The quotes with 'appearance' may be able to be rationalized by your explanation. But definitely not this one "It causes the regression toward the mean".

South Bay is a bigger market than north bay. The season tickets cancalled by people in north bay should not be an issue, people in south bay will pick them up in no time. I think traffic will actually be better in Santa Clara. There're more highways (I-680, I-880, I-101, I-237, I-85, I-87) in Santa Clara than Candlestick. There're also more public transportations there.

By these biased fans, it only applies when Bills lose. When Bills do win, they'll drop this argument and change to JP doesn't have "it".

I can't believe this thread lasts this long. However, I'm not surprised to find HA is hiding here and crying about being pointed out that he manipulated stats by his problematic, prematured, and biased method. It seems like someone needs to be reminded one more time: Everyone can create any numbers he likes with a prematured system: (1) Create his own rules to omit the stats he doesn't want (2) Pick the threshold to favor him most (3) Use personal judgement to retain the stats which should be ommitted by different thresholds based on his rules (4) Simplify the whole system to help his argument (5) Get the manufactured numbers benefit his opinion These manufactured numbers are useless and show nothing more than "I think".

It's not even close. You need to be reminded again: Everyone can create any numbers he likes with a prematured system. (1) Create his own rules to omit the stats he doesn't want (2) Pick the threshold to favor him most (3) Use personal judgement to retain the stats which should be ommitted by different thresholds based on his rules (4) Simplify the whole system to favor his argument (5) Get the manufactured numbers benefit his opinion These manufactured numbers are useless and show nothing more than "I think ......".

I'm not sure if Bills can do this. I may understand the bonus rule wrong, what I remember is that the reporting or roster bonus is not prorated only if it's paid after the beginning of training camp and before the last preseason game. Otherwise, even Bills include roster bonus in a contract, it is still considered a signing bonus. One thing Bills can do is to make bonus not guaranteed, for example, non-guaranteed off-season roster bonus and non-guaranteed off-season workout bonus. However I'm not sure if players would accept big non-guaranteed bonus and if Bills could make the bonus counted against this year's cap instead of next year.

Vikings could do this on Winfiled's contract not because they managed their cap well. It's mainly because their cap limit (~90M) was higher than other teams (~80M) in 2004. Because LTBE incentives are counted against cap room and many of Vikings players didn't achieve their LTBE clauses in 2003, Vikings got rewarded an extra cap room of roughly 10 million dollars in 2004. Therefore, they could convert Winfiled's bonus to roster bonus and utilized this extra cap space.

If you did read the whole thread, you should be able to notice that his system is prematured and incomplete. Missing such an adjective may not be deemed a mistake to you, but it certainly is to me especially he was replying directly to my post. Thank you for providing your opinion. Even he said:

Whatever, Ralph Wilson Stadium is NOT the oldest NFL stadium as you claimed.

For example: Lambeau Field: 1957 Alltel Stadium: 1946 3COM Park: 1960 Network Associates Coliseum: 1966

Wrong, Ralph Wilson Stadium was opened in 1973 and is only the 10th oldest among NFL stadiums.

Not without the ability to create any stats through prematured systems.

Look carefully, it's putting "prematured" between "my" and "system" in his post: