JDHillFan

In all fairness, I’ve seen people use Uncle Tom before and I’ve also seen people “make note” of interracial marriage as you have done. It’s always been abhorrent whether it was from an enlightened blue stater or a red state hillbilly.

You never answered the question about what makes you wise enough to declare another an Uncle Tom. That’s not even a dog-whistle (one of the blue teams favorite terms/accusations). Easier to just respond with laughing emoji’s when you expose yourself in that way. All in good fun.

Just tell us all what makes you, anonymous internet poster, high enough and mighty enough to declare an accomplished African American man an Uncle Tom. It’s also clear that you take issue with him being married to a white woman. All because other anonymous internet posters said bad things about Biden and Obama? That’s your defense for being a racist? Unbelievable. You should probably just backtrack here rather than dig.

What are your qualifications to declare an accomplished African-American an Uncle Tom? Rather than actually having standing to slander him like that, as if that’s even possible, it seems more likely that you are just a shameless, sick, racist f**k. Unbelievable.

I was listening to democrat pollster Celinda Lake on tv tonight. TWICE she referred to Kamala-madingdong as incredibly eloquent. Let that sink in for a minute. I understand the need to fluff but to use eloquent??? Good lord man.

Effing Tucker Carlson is the worst!!

If you take away the stealing and awfulness they seem like a pretty good…..them?

I don’t know about the rest of you but I can’t even go out for a drink on a Friday evening without tripping over NAZIS left and right. They’re everywhere!

Hank? Hank Hill?? Outstanding!!

It seems as though you are struggling. The post from you that you are unwilling to accept a compliment on said: “Hey @B-Man, what does Tucker say about it?” Just because I find it to be the perfect combination of insight and wit doesn’t make it Jeffersonian. Just take the W and move on.

That’s a lot of explanation. Might as well just take some pride in the original response. It was that good!

Absolutely KILLER response! Some of your very best work. Kudos!!

There was also this: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/jul/03/tom-cotton/tom-cotton-hillary-clinton-pushed-reset-russia-mon/

I stood with our good American president when he said a minor incursion was ok. I don’t know why he said that but who am I to question?

The cloth mask will prevent the young lady from catching deadly coronavirus from the multi-vaccinated VP. I think that’s what the science says.

Not surprised that you would type that much only to again miss my point entirely. I have not implied all the news outlets were out to get Trump. I stated outright that most media entities loathed him and that may have played into the shutting down of a story that might be harmful to their preferred candidate. This is common sense. ( I know you see yourself as an authority in the field). I also have no theory. You are painting that picture yourself. I have an issue with censorship. You are fine with it. Twitter, while now in downfall, was the leading platform by which information was shared at the time. They shut down cold the account of the 6th largest newspaper in the country. Despite what you want to call it, that’s censorship. Pure common sense (I know you see yourself as an authority in the field).

Unsurprisingly not remotely correct. My issue is with censorship. You deny it was in play and I see Twitter suspending the account of the 6th largest newspaper in America over reporting that passed muster. I see NPR declaring the matter of no interest and not worthy of considering. I see the hard hitting investigative journalists at 60 minutes declare nothing to see here. Rather than debate and report more, you and your side approve of stifling discussion. I find that disgusting. You find it to be “capitalism”.

Irresponsible crack-addled loser leaves laptop behind with compromising information. That’s some disinfo op. Was it the Russians pulling the strings on that one? Meanwhile the hard hitting investigative journalists at 60 Minutes were running with this as part of their “vetting” of the story: It’s a very important issue to find out whether a man’s corrupt who’s running for president, who’s accepted money from China, and Ukraine, and from Russia,” Trump responds. “Take a look at what’s going on, Leslie, and you say that shouldn’t be discussed?…I think it’s one of the biggest scandals I’ve ever seen, and you don’t cover it.” “Well because it can’t be verified,” Stahl says. “I’m telling you—” “Of course it can be verified,” Trump interjects. “Excuse me, Leslie, they found a laptop—” “It can’t be verified,” Stahl repeats. At least NPR was on the job with their “vetting”: There was no censorship (maybe Twitter suspending the account of the NY Post would qualify as censorship but lets not quibble over the 6th largest newspaper in America) and I’m sure all the non-censorship had absolutely nothing to do with loathing of Donald Trump. All we have to do to make it so is redefine the word censorship and make it mean capitalism. Right?

censorship 1. the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security. You should consider freshening up on your understanding of censorship. The “questionable” story was actually quite true and very newsworthy. It was suppressed due to it being politically unacceptable to the vast majority of media (traditional and social) and those they make no secret of supporting. If you view that as capitalism rather than censorship you will certainly be breaking new ground in the use of the language.

Twitter and Facebook made it such that the Post story could not be shared. Twitter locked the Post account unless they deleted their tweets regarding the very true laptop story. Virtually every other major media outlet joined the pack with glee. Do you truly have a hard time understanding how that is censorship?

“OKAY!!” - Tiberius

I don’t think there’s a lot of people suggesting otherwise. The problem was people like you cheering on Joe Biden as people lost their jobs over vaccine mandates and to this day trying to defend it by declaring people stupid and selfish….only to pivot to different strokes for different folks because the science is evolving. Unbelievable. I imagine the next argument is “nobody forced those people to work in those jobs that required coerced vaccines”. Have at it.

It’s a shame all those European nations and institutions are hellbent on self destruction with their stupidity and selfishness even if you won’t admit that’s the case.

It’s almost as if you are trying to distance yourself from “stupid and selfish” with your insistence on inconsistence. Probably the right thing to do.