JDHillFan

What, in this case, would constitute “all accounts”?

Nobody should care about this because it does not affect them personally. It only impacts women who have worked extremely hard to compete in their events expecting a level playing field. F those hateful people.

I knew it would be good. Thanks for not disappointing.

https://clincalc.com/DrugStats/Drugs/Ivermectin Any thoughts on why US doctors prescribed horse medicine for people over 300,000 times in 2017? It certainly wasn’t covid. I eagerly await your spin. Should be good.

I don’t deny it, nor do I care who took what or where they got it. It’s a medication, proven safe and effective and used by hundreds of millions of people over decades. Why did your favored media mockingly refer to it as horse medicine? Why not just play it straight?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/ Ivermectin proved to be even more of a ‘Wonder drug’ in human health, improving the nutrition, general health and wellbeing of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat Onchocerciasis in humans in 1988. It proved ideal in many ways, being highly effective and broad-spectrum, safe, well tolerated and could be easily administered (a single, annual oral dose). What was the reasoning for your preferred media outlets to refer to it as horse medicine as opposed to trying to report it straightforward?

Countering republican attacks is the main thing. The actual crime? Whatever.

https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/details Yes. For a long time. Doesn’t appear to be “credible” against covid. The point being made is that the Don Lemon’s of the world referred to it as horse medicine. You can’t possibly be on board with that.

Solid defense of your guy. Exceedingly well done. Forget all that stuff about phony data.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-masks-robbery-nypd-require-customers-remove-covid-19/ But the point remains.

https://newrepublic.com/article/142708/david-brooks-tyranny-data This guy? You are letting your age group down with what seems to be a total absence of savvy. Brooks reported incorrect dates, cited the wrong polling organization, named incorrect participants in the study the polls were actually taken from, gave wrong statistics, and, according to the authors of the study, offered an incorrect interpretation of the study’s findings. This one passage, which served to illustrate a central thesis of his book about a historical decline in humility, functioned as a main talking point for him and the media during the book’s PR campaign. Why would a distinguished writer like Brooks be so negligent—or purposefully misleading—with such a critical passage?

One of these should work - for the people at the NYT that feel this story is newsworthy. For Chanel I suggest a haircut.

https://www.ocregister.com/2008/07/14/ap-goes-for-advocacy-journalism/ Goes back 15 years now.

You are far too old to be using “prolly”. Also…

Glad you got a laugh out of it and that you were able to work your bogeyman into it. You might consider contacting the author and alerting him to the Kanye/Trump factor at play.

Not found in the article - “Trump”. Kind of curious about this: Younger Jews are being excluded from the liberal organizations their parents and grandparents helped create. Identitarian meltdowns roil the progressive world. The Women’s March, the ACLU, and the SPLC all get rid of Jewish leadership. There will be no more “Mighty Iras” in our lifetime. Not even the Jewish president of the Audubon Society is safe.

🚨Shocking development 🚨- CNN actually reports on AOC Met Gala ethics concerns…after 17 paragraphs of a story headlined “House Ethics Committee announces investigation into embattled Rep. George Santos”. https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/02/politics/george-santos-house-ethics-committee/index.html

No mention of party affiliation from the nearby Baltimore Sun. I never expected that. Let’s just move along and be glad a creepy democrat pedo is off the streets for the moment.

Is this maggot a NAZI or is he “merely” an antisemite? Hard to say for sure as NAZI was nowhere to be found in the article. Neither was maggot but we can readily assume that part. Perhaps we need a thread for antisemitism concerns. That would be a good place to discuss Tlaib, Pressley, Omar, AOC, etc.

Hard to believe a prominent elected official would have ethical issues. She’s not even a republican.

Chigoose/redhawk - can you say DREAM GIRL?

In other words, an incel.

This must be your way of saying they all love money and power. Like the bad orange man. Exception granted for the altruists Sanders, Kinz, and Cheney of course. Did you get a chance to go to Bernie’s paid-admission “It’s OK To Be Angry About Capitalism” event in DC last night? Average ticket price was only 89.00.

Based on everything you’ve seen do you expect all those people to eventually leave congress significantly more well off, more well off, the same…off, less well off. This is a test of your powers of observation.

Are you aware of a politician that doesn’t love power and money? I would love to hear who might fall into that category.