JDHillFan

You seem to have the same mental acumen so I thought maybe you were.

You are no doubt white. Was Popeye a racist too?

Was. No she uses the status she has gained to crap on those of the bartender strata. Just because her behavior in this matter is repellent nobody is telling you not to defend it. It’s not like you haven’t advertised the sort of person you are well before now. Did you ever state why you feel you have earned “the right” to refer to another as an uncle tom?

This is what happens when you become slave to a political party rather than have any core values. You rush to the defense of an elite crapping all over those she sees as beneath her. Why?

She’s either smart for getting people to pay her way or a complete dumbass for thinking she could keep it all under wraps. Who’s to say? Either way, she seems like a real champion of the little people. A fine liberal indeed. Ever caring! The documents also show that AOC was billed $1,300 for her dress, but her staff was able to cut $1,100 cut off the price tag, along with getting the price of her $635 shoes knocked down by listing them as rentals, too, the Mail reported. The socialist then failed to pay back thousands of dollars in bills from the Gala night, including $344.85 in makeup costs that had to be passed on to a collections agency as “extremely overdue.” She also took so long to pay back $477.73 for hair styling that a a rep for the stylist “reached out to her staff and said ‘it would look terrible if we had to file a complaint with the NY Dept of Labor against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,'” the Mail reported. It took her nearly a year to pay that bill, Business Insider reported. And it took eight months for her to pay more than $1,000 for transportation that was footed by Conde Nast, and she took nearly a year to pay $4,602.92 in bills at the Carlisle Hotel from the evening, according to the Post. “In addition, a publicist associated with the company that supplied Ocasio-Cortez with her rental items — a gown, a handbag and shoes — provided a final invoice to the campaign staffer in September 2021 for about $990, but it went unpaid for months. The company then identified in April that $5,579.99 worth of unpaid goods and services had been provided to Ocasio-Cortez and her partner for the event, the report said,” NBC News reported. https://www.dailywire.com/news/aoc-exposed-for-the-extraordinary-hypocrite-she-truly-is It seems on first read that she’s sh*tting on people left and right here but she’s probably just a victim of others incompetence. Kind of like how Biden had all those classified documents accidentally spilled on him. These people cannot catch a break.

Updated info on accidental spillage that happened to Brandon. He just can’t catch a break!

Just so long as it’s not a trail that you frequent. Those are loaded with NAZIS.

Complete idiocy flowing like a river. It’s as if the three or four decades of experience you have over li’l billsy and L Ron taught you nothing at all. Sorry to see it pops.

I honestly, personally know of no Dems that found the BLM riots acceptable and called for the release of those arrested. Are you also oblivious outside of the 18-20 hours a day you spend here?

Aka SCIENCE!!

https://www.outkick.com/novak-djokovic-forced-withdraw-indian-wells-united-states-entry-denied/ Will one of you that reflexively defends Biden, even to the point of declaring that by “all accounts” he speaks more clearly today than he did when he was younger (🤦‍♂️), please take a stab at defending this?

Your message board running mate, li’l billsy, absolutely detests plagiarism so I’m going to help out by providing the link that you cribbed from. Consider it a random act of kindness. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/blogs/ainsight-atrial-fibrillation-pilots We can leave the dumbassery of changing the topic from Biden’s physical and mental state to afib in pilots for others to discuss.

Why no sanctions on these two billionaires?

What, in this case, would constitute “all accounts”?

Nobody should care about this because it does not affect them personally. It only impacts women who have worked extremely hard to compete in their events expecting a level playing field. F those hateful people.

I knew it would be good. Thanks for not disappointing.

https://clincalc.com/DrugStats/Drugs/Ivermectin Any thoughts on why US doctors prescribed horse medicine for people over 300,000 times in 2017? It certainly wasn’t covid. I eagerly await your spin. Should be good.

I don’t deny it, nor do I care who took what or where they got it. It’s a medication, proven safe and effective and used by hundreds of millions of people over decades. Why did your favored media mockingly refer to it as horse medicine? Why not just play it straight?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/ Ivermectin proved to be even more of a ‘Wonder drug’ in human health, improving the nutrition, general health and wellbeing of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat Onchocerciasis in humans in 1988. It proved ideal in many ways, being highly effective and broad-spectrum, safe, well tolerated and could be easily administered (a single, annual oral dose). What was the reasoning for your preferred media outlets to refer to it as horse medicine as opposed to trying to report it straightforward?

Countering republican attacks is the main thing. The actual crime? Whatever.

https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/details Yes. For a long time. Doesn’t appear to be “credible” against covid. The point being made is that the Don Lemon’s of the world referred to it as horse medicine. You can’t possibly be on board with that.

Solid defense of your guy. Exceedingly well done. Forget all that stuff about phony data.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-masks-robbery-nypd-require-customers-remove-covid-19/ But the point remains.

https://newrepublic.com/article/142708/david-brooks-tyranny-data This guy? You are letting your age group down with what seems to be a total absence of savvy. Brooks reported incorrect dates, cited the wrong polling organization, named incorrect participants in the study the polls were actually taken from, gave wrong statistics, and, according to the authors of the study, offered an incorrect interpretation of the study’s findings. This one passage, which served to illustrate a central thesis of his book about a historical decline in humility, functioned as a main talking point for him and the media during the book’s PR campaign. Why would a distinguished writer like Brooks be so negligent—or purposefully misleading—with such a critical passage?