Jump to content

JoPoy88

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,762
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JoPoy88

  1. 17 minutes ago, DaggersEOD said:

    With their sudden expansion/explosion into the sports betting world and their now close relationship with Vegas, the many terrible, game deciding penalties are starting to look suspicious. 
     

    Some say that the NFL is completely clean and on the up and up. Others swear the whole thing is entirely scripted and the lure of Vegas money is too big a temptation to ignore. 
     

    The shield doesn’t seem to mind the grumbling, as the revenue has also massively expanded. Sports betting has been good for the NFL. 

     

    SPORTS betting…but the NFL isn’t a sport. It’s entertainment. As a matter of fact, betting on entertainment (like the WWE) is illegal in the US. 

     

    So the obvious solution is to confront the NFL and tell them that unless they reclassify themselves as a sport, they cannot participate in sports betting.

     

    That should lead to more oversight/management of the refs to ensure unbiased game officiating. 
     

    Just a Sat morning thought. I’m sure there are a million reasons why it won’t work, but I’m still feeling salty today, almost a week later. LFG BUFFALO!!


    Yeah I’m sure the NFL and Congress will get right on that. Thanks for sharing your diary entry.

    • Haha (+1) 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  2. 1 hour ago, PBF81 said:

     

    Forums do a lot of thinking with their ***** when signings like this are made.  

     

     

     

    His signing was an enormous risk to begin with, and the reason for Beane having to sign him was because at that time and after four of his drafts prior to that, he was unsuccessful at securing an impact edge-rusher for us.  

     

    Anyone thinking that it was a stupid and far too risky signing was chastised, which supports your first statement replied to above.  

     

    At the end of the day, Beane took an enormous risk to overcome his poor draft production.  He's getting quite a pass on that acquisition.  

     

    Either way, that ridiculous risk has played out, and that was far from a reach in terms of occurring, between injury and age diminishment, and the performance part of that deal has not worked out, nearly at all except for 10 games.  

     

    Given how much money he's gotten, that's an absurd amount of money per game.  

     

    It's highly questionable as to why he deserved a week off.  

     

     

     


    oh great, you’re back.

    • Haha (+1) 4
  3. Lol all this arguing about a close play and no one has the sack to actually post a clip of it. Never change TBD

    2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

    This nonsense needs to stop. Splash plays happen every week in the league that are RUINED by refs blowing their whistle in the middle of play

     

    every turnover is automatically reviewed.

     

    There is ZERO need for a whistle to be blown when a play like the Douglas Fumble Recovery and lateral to Hyde happens


    post the clip then chief. Let’s see how obvious it was. 

  4. 2 hours ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

    Pierce (?) is an extremely underrated back … at least he was.  Singletary being behind him is not a slight on him 

    It is Pierce my bad on the spelling - he is good as a 3rd rounder (which is where RBs probably should be taken.) so it’s no big slight on Motor but I was just responding to the OP who probably has seen only his last two games and commenting off that.

  5. 3 minutes ago, Herc11 said:

     

    I may be wrong, but isn't a lot of his lack of production up until now because he has been the #2 behind pierce? Now that pierce is hurt and he is the #1, he's playing well.

     

    And Moss was tearing ***** up until Taylor came back.


    A better case can be made for Moss yes. 
     

    The fact that Singletary was behind Pearce kinda tells you something doesn’t it?

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1
    • Agree 1
  6. 2 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

    Don't know who they are but the both guys are 100% spot on and I agree that Stef was talking to his circle , which prompted the ridiculous tweets by his brother.  I love 14 but starting last year, leaving the locker room, as a captain,  is a terrible look and unacceptable.  Then missing OTAs, the cryptic tweets. Like grow the F up man, if you have something to say, say it yourself! 

    Maybe he's truly a cancer in that locker room , idk but it wouldn't be the first time in his career. 

    https://x.com/pickasidepod/status/1724899655514050908?s=20

     

    Gronk chiming in on Diggs - https://x.com/jasrifootball/status/1724909131751100651?s=20


    I mean, maybe I’d agree with you if it had any impact on the play on field. It doesn’t. Stefon Diggs, weird as he may be to some, has never, ever not shown up to play. He wants to be the best and he wants to win. Period. If he’s pissed it’s for good reasons.


    Josh Allen, on the other hand, it’s hard to tell sometimes.

     

    I don’t care what his brother says on X either.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

     

    There is no way he is checked out mentally, he wants to win just like everyone else, especially after throwing picks the last thing he is going to is gently roll the ball off his finger tips. He had to think Cook had it.

     

     


    I mean maybe? Don’t get me wrong I hope you’re right and it’s a physical thing with the shoulder that hopefully gets right soon.

     

    I am not one of those body language experts or whatever they term themselves but just looking and listening to the guy makes me think there’s a mental aspect to this too.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. 12 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

    He's a shill.   He invests a lot of time in telling fans that they are wrong to quiet the critics of the organization............this helps preserve his job with the team.

     

    But when the organization makes a turn that undermines the sales pitch he has to have a response.

     

    Perhaps he thinks anger makes it seem like the organization was pushed into making the decision by critics.

     

    Either way........as a shill you gotta' take anything he says with a grain.

     

    Under the cover of a little bit of time he can just do what he did with Tremaine Edmunds...........talk him up and shout down critics when he was with the team..........then say the same things as the critics did after he left the team.


    Harsh but accurate.

    • Agree 2
  9. 19 minutes ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

     

    You literally quoted his entire post word for word and complained about the length... that's odd as well.


    yeah - it’s called a quote and i’m not going to sit here and shave it down when basically he’s making a single point and it’s wrong. What aren’t you getting here?

     

    If this guy didn’t fancy himself this board’s Bill Barnwell (minus actual facts of course) then the quotes wouldn’t be so long ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Dislike 3
  10. 2 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

    Boston Globe writer Ben Volin says it’s “scapegoat season” in Buffalo, with Ken Dorsey being the latest scapegoat (less than a year after Leslie Frazier was the scapegoat).  That "scapegoat" crap is what commercial journalists drag out every time a team fires a coordinator in mid-season.  (It's like dragging out the "rust" discussion every time one baseball team sweeps and then has to wait a week or more to play again.  At least rust is a real thing; this scapegoating is not.) They say it because some portion of the fan base believes the head coach should be fired; identifying Dorsey as a “scapegoat” (without proof, of course) proves, doesn’t it, that McDermott is the real problem.  These headhunters imply that the Head Coach should understand he's the problem and - what - fire himself?  Quit?  The journalist doesn't necessarily believe it, but saying that the OC is simply a scapegoat is playing to the people who want the head coach out, and not journalism.

     

    So, I think Volin is taking a simple, hackneyed way out instead of doing his readers a favor by explaining what's really going on.

     

    The reality is that a lot of people who understand the Bills had the same view of the team as I did in preseason - that the defense would be solid, and the success of the team would be measured by the success of the offense.  Success of the offense depended on (1) Dorsey running a good offense, and (2) Allen executing it.  We're now seeing those two questions being answered.  In other words, if the Bills were going to have a difficult season in 2023, the most likely reason was exactly what we're seeing.  

     

    The team's defense has been decimated with injuries, but even so, they've kept the Bills in games.  They are middle of the league average in yards allowed per game, but they are fifth in the league in points allowed per game.  It's actually quite an accomplishment that McDermott as HC and DC has built a defense that is somehow surviving the injuries and still making opponents work hard to get something. 

     

    It's the offense that has disappointed, not the defense.  Allen is not performing well, and it's possible he's lost focus, hit a wall, or something, but that's less believable than he running this offense well.  He still can make all the throws better than anyone ever, but he isn't making them.  Sometimes he seems not to be decisive, and yes maybe he just can't master reading defenses and executing the offense.  But, it doesn't look like that's true, and even if it is, no one is going to give up yet on his talent.   He's a generational talent, and it's just a stupid play to trade him for a boatload of picks and players, or whatever.

     

    So, that means, one way or the other, Dorsey is the problem.  Either Dorsey is failing to design a quality NFL passing offense, or he's failing at training Allen to execute.  If he's failing in design, you have to move on to someone else.  If his offense is fine and he can't get Allen to execute, then, again, you have to move on, because you're committed to Allen long term, and you need to find an OC who can harness Allen's talent. 

     

    Dorsey's offense last season didn't look good as the season wore on.  He picked up from where Daboll had left off, but he failed to build the offense further (and he has more to work with than Daboll had).  Still, it was clear to me that he is a talented guy, and it was his rookie year.  If you believed in his potential, you needed to give him another year to see.  If you didn't believe in his potential, then you shouldn't have hired him in the first place. 

     

    Now, ten games into the season, the Bills are five and five.  The offense, after an early season explosion, with Allen looking all-worldly, is getting stopped consistently by most every defense they see.  Whatever it takes to be a good offensive coordinator, whatever creativity it takes to keep tweaking your offense as the opponents tweak their defenses, whatever that is, Dorsey doesn't seem to have it.   In his second season, his opportunity to prove the brass wise, he is looking somewhat less capable than in his rookie year.  This team is now top-10 in yards and points per game, but they've fallen way off from their league-leading production in the first four or five weeks.   Now, they are struggling, visibly and statistically.  But even if they plateau around the top-10, that is NOT the expectation with this offense.  The whole point is that with a talent like Allen, top-10 simply isn't enough.  If your offense with Allen isn't top-3, then your offense is failing.  (That’s true if injuries weren’t a problem, and Dorsey hasn't had many injuries.  In fact, I think he started the same offensive line for all ten games.) 

     

    Are there other problems with the Bills?  For sure, and that was completely apparent against the Broncos.  The special teams had three really bad plays, the final being an inexcusable procedural penalty that cost them the game.  The defense seems to be getting gashed for the big play more frequently, and it is bending a lot and breaking sometimes.   But, as noted, the injuries are serious - their best safety, their best corner, their best linebacker, their best interior defensive lineman ALL are out for the season.  (And their best edge rusher (Von Miller) has not yet recovered to anything like what he was.  He said he was going to play early, and he is playing.  But it's common to take more than a year to recover from an ACL, and he's right on schedule.  We might not see the real Von Miller again until next season.) 

     

    Look at the scores in the Bills' losses:  22-16, 25-20, 29-25, 24-18, 24-22.  It's a team that has a defense that keeps the Bills in games, despite their injuries.  It's a team should have a top-5 offense with Allen but instead has an offense putting up numbers that are no better than ordinary.

     

    And finally, is it possible that for some reason (personality, ego, whatever) McDermott will never allow an offensive coordinator the freedom necessary to run the offense?  In other words, is McDermott the problem?  Well, yes, sure, that's possible.  But the question is the same as with Dorsey: did you believe in him when you hired him, and do you believe in him now?  When the guy has put together winners like he has, it's hard not to believe in him for a while longer.   He's intensely committed to winning.  So, yes, maybe the problem is McDermott, but let's say we bet:   You can bet on the future career of the second-season offensive coordinator whose offense isn't getting it done; I'll take the future career of the fifth-winningest coach (%) among all active NFL coaches, behind, LaFleur, Belichick, Reid, and Tomlin and ahead of McCarthy, Harbaugh, Carroll, and McVay.  (Oh, and total wins among active coaches?  He's ninth, ahead of McVay, Shanahan, Vrabel, and Lafleur.) 

     

    So, no, Mr. Boston Globe, sir, moving Dorsey out of there in mid-season has nothing at all to do with some "scapegoat" nonsense; it is, in fact, the logical decision under the circumstances.   Maybe with a change, you can find a way to salvage the season, but whatever happens, you know now Dorsey won't be the guy in 2024.  If he's not the guy next season, then at a minimum you can try out someone from your staff to see if he might be the guy. 

     

    GO BILLS!!!

     

    The Rockpile Review is written to share the passion we have for the Buffalo Bills. That passion was born in the Rockpile; its parents were every-day people of western New York who translated their dedication to a full day’s hard work and simple pleasures into love for a pro football team.


    I mean, everything you said about Dorsey and his deficiencies is true, but the reasons why some are calling him the scapegoat after his firing are there and you just choose to ignore them or dismiss them away, which is odd given how excruciatingly long these always are. 
     

    Both Beane and McDermott have said they’ve tried to alter Allen’s game for the sake of his longevity. That all on Dorsey? Nope. And Allen is different now, one can presume some of that from both the GM and (mostly) the head coach is at least partly to blame.  And if you agree that it is partly to blame, then yes, Dorsey is, at least partly, a scapegoat.
     

    But yeah, go ahead - Dorsey was the tumor they cut out and everything’s fine now. So simplistic.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
    • Dislike 2
  11. 16 hours ago, steven50 said:

    I know its all doom and gloom but I'm gonna try a little glass half full post.

     

    The only road to the playoffs is through winning the AFC east, wild card is out of the picture now. If we beat the Jets, Fins Pats, and chargers we would finish the season at 9-8

     

    I can see Miami losing to: Titans, Cowboys, Ravens, Bills and raiders (and/or splitting with Jets) which would finish them at 9 -8 (although if they split with the Jets AND lose to the raiders that would be 8-8)

     

    We win Tie Breaker if both finish 9-8.

     

    Playoffs.

     

    What do you think are the odds?

     

     I think you should talk to your doctor and see if you need to decrease your dose.

    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Dislike 1
  12. 12 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

    With Josh's mishandling of the ball on hand offs , it makes me wonder if he has numbness in hands because dropping the ball twice while handing it off should just not happen, thats pee wee level stuff. Maybe he's getting pain killer shots thats making it difficult to feel the ball , could also explain his errant throws ??

     

     


    I highly doubt it, but if so, then the onus is on the coaches and training staff to ID it and tell him he can’t go. 
     

    But given the rockets I’ve seen him throw in the weeks Allen got dropped and fell on that throwing shoulder, I doubt it’s a physical problem. The dude is checked out mentally. I have no idea why and not going to pretend I do like everyone else on this board.

×
×
  • Create New...