Jump to content

Giuseppe Tognarelli

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,840
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Giuseppe Tognarelli

  1. Just now, Gman10 said:

    Why do we "need" a Broncos loss? Aren't we doing well in seeding etc

    They're the biggest threat. If we don't beat the Dolphins, we need them to lose a game at some point (like tonight, because they'll be favored the next 2 weeks) or they'll be ahead of us.

  2. 15 minutes ago, Einstein said:

     

    We don’t need all of that to happen. The tweet included way too many.

     

    We only need Denver loss (hopefully tonight), Cinci loss, Pitt loss.

     

    The tweet made it way more convuluted and difficult. 

     

     

    @mrags

    You're right! With Cleveland at #5, if you then you concede that two teams will come out of the AFC South at 10-7 (one division winner, one WC) and a third will be 9-8 at best (which is guaranteed because of IND-HOU matchup), that means there is one WC left for BUF/DEN/PIT/CIN.

     

    And as I said long ago, all this talk about tiebreakers will be moot and 10-7 will make it because it does 99% of the time.

    2 minutes ago, mrags said:

    I think it’s helpfull that it pointed out what we needed specifically for each seed. I want more than just making it into the playoffs. I want the division. I want a home game. Hell, I want 2 or more home games. 
     

    maybe that tweet is incorrect regarding what needs to happen for each seeding. Or maybe it’s not. I haven’t done the leg work. I’m not about to play around with the playoff calculator here and over again all day for different scenarios. I’m not about to figure out the who’s who and what needs to happen with all the tie breakers like conference wins and strength of schedule. I like the way this tweet had everything broken down. 
     

    If you are saying it’s wrong be use we don’t need all that to be in the playoffs then we’re having different arguments. If what they said is incorrect, then I’d like to see a specific breakdown of what exactly is needed for each seed that has been fact checked. But I’m not spending my time to figure it out. 

    The seeding stuff was correct. The only thing that was incorrect was the playoff clinching at the end, because it's actually easier than the tweet suggested. There will be a be a new tweet.

  3. 1 minute ago, NeverOutNick said:


    He stated “Think if Bills do win out, they'll be #3 seed

     

    This isn’t true unless I’m missing something. It’s fun to speculate but the only truth is if we win out we are in the playoffs. What seeding from 2-7 all depends on what other teams do along the way. 

    ??? I said I think if the Bills win out, they'll be the #3 seed. I think this is the most likely outcome. It's not a guarantee.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 20 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:

    I love the excitement but if the chiefs and one of Jax, IND, HOU win out as well wouldn’t we be the 4 seed? We lost the h2h vs the jags.

     

    I did bet raiders to beat chiefs this week. I do feel like if the refs don’t get involved that should be a close game the way both teams have played as of late 

    ??? The post says that all the teams you mentioned have to lose 1 of 3, not win out

×
×
  • Create New...