Jump to content

Old Coot

Community Member
  • Posts

    820
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Old Coot

  1. 21 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

    Sitting here in the dead of night I have came to the realization that I have been on this website for over 8 years 

     

    Plenty of times on the road this website keeps me occupied talking with Bills fans which is more than I could ever ask for 

     

    Thanks to All of the moderators and site owner

     

    @AiO @R. Rich@SDS@Nervous Guy @Simon @Canadian Bills Fan 

     

    And this is easily the best NFL message board in the country thanks to all the bills fans here... Too many to count and name 

     

    Just wanted to say thank you and go bills

     

    Buffalo716 -- a heartfelt post if there ever was one.  I and others appreciate your deep knowledge of the game and your willingness to share it.

     

    On this latter topic, I read a piece on how the D could show man but really be in zone. One of the "tells" that its a man D is for the O to put a WR in motion to the opposite side. If a db fallows that motion, it's man.

     

    But the piece described how the db could follow the motion, thus showing man but the D was really playing zone. This tricks the QB into thinking it was man coverage.

     

    Here's the rub (no pun intended): I cannot find the post and I cannot remember how the D plays zone to the side the db vacated.

     

    Do you know the answer? Thanks

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 7 hours ago, Don Otreply said:

    This happened frequently when Dorsey was our OC 

    Any idea why this would happen? Was Dorsey's system too comples (e.g. too many receiver options in the play); verbiage too complex; something else?

  3. Don't forget Jack Kemp. he QB'd the Bills to two AFL championships in 1964 and 65. In 1966 he led the Bills to their third consecutive appearance in the AFL championship game, losing to KC, for the right to play Green Bay in Superbowl I.

     

    Should Daryl Lamonica (aka the Mad Bomber) be on the list?

  4. 8 hours ago, bmur66 said:

    What is this? Freakin rugby?

    It's a Rugby scrum minus the hookers.

    12 minutes ago, BigDingus said:

    Amusing that the Bills, the team that runs the tush push 2nd most often after the Eagles, voted to ban it. 

     

    Meanwhile, the teams we use it against in our own division, the Jets & Patriots, voted in favor of it... weird.

    What's up with this? Your thoughts?

  5. Cook is running behind one of the better OLs in the league. Wouldn't that positively affect his output?

     

    I'm not saying that Cook isn't a telented back; he is. But whether he's elite or whether another RB could do the same as Cook is surely affected by the quality of the OL.

  6. I'll add another possible reason for downplaying the deep ball and that's the defenses teams run now. Most run some version of the Cover 2 shell which is designed to take away long completions.

     

    Now that doesn't mean you don't need some speed burners at WR.  As many have pointed out in this thread the ability to threaten deep routes with speed opens up the underneath routes.

  7. 3 hours ago, Big Turk said:

    Irrelevant. We won't know for 3-4 years.

    This. Most of the post-Rd 3 picks for good teams (who draft at the end of rounds) look like depth role or PS players. Some will be; others will seize their opportunity and become good starters. So let's wait and see.

×
×
  • Create New...