wnyguy

I would agree with you there and may I add that your posts sometimes make me stop and think.

Aren't we all prejudiced by our own experiences and environment?

That's a great position to be in, everyones wrong but you

Insanity.

You should probably read the actual article that you link before you link it and ask yourself "Does this article support my crazy liberal viewpoint?" If it does not it's probably not a good idea to post the link and prove how much of a misguided moron you are. Be Best

It surely is not a hoax just the simple truth.

Did you read the article?

It's like you can't go around stabbing people anymore. Sheesh, these cops.

So you are saying that white people will not have to comply with the voting regulation changes and that it applies only to minorities? Well then yeah, that is racist. Oh wait, it seems it applies to people of all color and social status. Nevermind.

Don't know too much about her but after just reading that article she seems to be a loon. Yes that's true....... right now.

I think that Democrats believe that capitalism is still the best way to go, while Socialist believe that all facets of life be owned by the government. In fact I was saying the opposite. Why was it ok for one and not the other?

That's true, and while it was perfectly ok to attend a political rally or a protest or a riot, churches and temples and mosques, grade schools, high schools and colleges were forced to shut their doors. Fantastic progress there.

I hate their actions but in the end we are all just people.

I oppose a big federal government that will enforce a specific way of thinking and beliefs into American culture.

Do I believe all Democrats are evil? No, I believe Socialists are evil for this country that's true.

If that cult is wanting a true and fair election then I am. Well your opinion would be wrong. I do not judge people on race or ethnicity or gender.

I believe it was to avoid having to admit that elections could be tampered with on such a grand scale. Yes that's my opinion.

Not true, no evidence was presented because the courts threw out the suits before they could be presented.

And I would stand with you in decrying these tactics by either side.

I guess I am relying on my eyes and my own common sense to hold my belief that the election was filled with inaccuracies and fraud and dishonesty. I could give you example after example but it would fall on deaf ears.

I am not doing that at all, simply pointing out the differences in boycotting a company that has made a position known versus one that has taken no position either way. Had Home Depot claimed a side then it would seem obvious that the opposition would exert pressure on them, but to make no claim either way and still be targeted by any political side (left or right] makes no sense to me.

So boycotting a corporation that has taken no position on the matter makes no sense. Why must a corporation be targeted for being neutral? Is it now "you're either for us or against us" ?

In your examples a position was taken by a corporation, true? In the Home Depot case no position was taken at all. also true?

Pressuring them for what though? Home Depot was silent on the issue, took no side, they were Switzerland, remained neutral, offered no opinion on the matter, and yet a call for boycott was raised. You don't see a difference?

Come on man, even you, deep down in your heart, know that it was an election rife with fraud and dishonesty. To believe otherwise is simply closing your eyes to the facts. I only wish that there was a true insurrection that day, a true overthrow of the corrupt politicians that laugh in the faces of Americans who believe that their votes matter.