VABills

Maybe they have not identified the US side? They are running the phones through switches and unable to trace. Who knows, who cares? Why if it stops a terrorist attack is it that important. Again, answer that.

Oh that's clear But legally I believe this gives him everything he needs to act both overseas and at home to deter future acts. The whole this word vs. that word is why people never understand anything.

And where has he been involved in any use of force for more then 60 days beyond Afghanistan and Iraq which were submitted and authorized by Congress. If Bush is taking action on these individual cases of planned terrorism, it is likely that everything is completed in less then 60 days and therefore the war powers act doesn't apply. The key phrase to be though and I continue to reitterate is that he was authorized to detect and deter, to protect all US citizens at home or abroad.

Probably Michael Moore, Dan Rather and a few others who were receiving money/funding from the terrorists to push their shrill agendas.

Did you see what I quoted and bolded? Who cares if it is a declaration of war? They authorized detection and deterence measures as well.

Here you go Ken: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/sept_11/sjres23_eb.htm With some key passages from it:

I was giving you the admins arguement, and a "quote" from the post. But if it will make you feel better I will try to find it.

The Sep 2001 resolution stated that the President was authorized to use all neccessary means and force to battle Al Qeada. In addition, they discussed some 1978 law that somehow include the surveillence of foreign nationals.

I heard that Bush tapped Ralph phone calls and fed the information to GR.

Fine for an inexperienced guy in his third year, give him a pass all you want, still doesn't make him good. Same goes for JP, he has shown some progress, but he really does suck and is probably the worst starter in the league right now. And last year Spikes had 5 Int's, 3 sacks, 2 TD's 11 passes defended, more tackles, etc.... The production is a huge dropoff. I don't expect him to be Spikes, but he is making too many tackles from the side and catching players, rather then hitting them head on. That mean he is having troubles getting off blocks or he is out of position.

Evans is like Peerless. He benefits from having Moulds on the other side. Teams don't design their defense to stop him. Mcgahee, the jury is still out. He is good, but not elite yet. Mcgee, sorry he is an adequate #2 corner, which is better then I projected him, but you don't make a return guy an elite player, at least I don't. Plus as much as he has been hurt, he doesn't deserve it even if I did. Moorman, again he is good but there are several others that are better in the AFC alone (Lechler is probably the best). Elite should mean top 5 at your position. I just don't see it with a lot of our guys.

No he really is pretty bad. Put it into perspective, do you honestly believe he could start on any other team? Maybe one or two. That should tell you that he is probably a career backup, special teamer, who is not a good LBer.

We have probably 2-4 elite players. Moulds, Spikes (if he comes back from his injury), and Fletcher (usually), Clement (again usually). That's it, and 3 of those are questionable.

Never said that, however Crowell is always out of position, gets manhandled and is not able to fend off blockers that get to the second level. Tackling guys as they run by your is not a good thing for a linebacker. the idea is to keep the play in front of you. Tackling as they go by means you have let the other team get 7-10 yards on you. But go ahead and think he is good.

Crowell sucks. Just because he starts doesn't make him good. Don't confuse the two.

I say Coles WR (5-7 165 pounds) from Miami, or Winston LT from Miami (reconstructed knee). Those 2 are expected to be top 10 and with our draft record will be who we get.

United we stand, divided we fall.

The constitution is for pussies. The law of order should be what ever I deem goes.

Kiffen

Do you disagree with his argument that they are fiddling? And I do care about certain rights, however, if it means that some dirtbag is planted illegally and it saves my family I have no problem with it. I don't go around making phone calls to order drugs, illegally gamble, make terrorists threats, etc... Isn't it great that the people who want to take every little nuance in the law and twist it so that anything goes, but when something bad happens it is the governments fault.

with Meathead Mike and Satanic Tom?

WTF is a jibjab file?

I don't think so, and I thank the masterbating ape for clarifiying my thought, and he stated quite well.

Again, I don't know why you cannot seem to comprehend. Regardless of the law, I personally have no problem with it and if they choose to change the law, I would support it. Is that clear enough for you?

Well good for you. You get all high and fucing mighty, and when the big bad us citizen doesn't get his cellphone sig capture and he blows up your work building or someones building that you love, don't go !@#$ing whining to me. Because I will just say i told you so.