So if the only difference is the Iraq war, then why bother? This is exactly what a lot on the left complain about when they accuse conservatives of being a one issue party and saying abortion is the issue.
3 and 4.
On 4, yeah light was holding quite a bit especially in the second half. However as has been noted Schoebal was pass rushing only and was taking himself out of a lot of plays by rushing up field on nearly every play.
On 3, no Reed was not short. In fact he pretty much was responsible for some great catches and 2 of our 3 first downs on 3rd down.
Then other listing are wrong as well. Take a look at ebay, they will let you setup who and where and for NYS events they will also NYS bidders to only go up to 4 times. Again unless that has changed from last year.
We got a phone call just as the plane crashed into the Pentagon, that it was just about to happen. I was across the river, and while I didn't see the plane actually go in, we saw the smoke immediately through my office window.
Pretty good numbers. But that said, I saw the stats on Crowell and there is no way he had 7 tackles wih 3 solo. I saw one. That's it, and I have replayed a good part of the game in addition to basically rewatching the entire 1st half.
One.
An almost rookie. Give it a rest. He cannot be considered an almost rookie anymore then Hocomb can. They have basically the same number of starts at this point. Hell Losmans been through 3 training camps now. Granted 2 were with meathead. But by any stretch he cannot be called a rookie anymore.
Yeah and everyone was saying how bad Notre Dame was the first week. Sometimes have time to prepare and someone can bite you.
Tell me again how Penn State did in week 2 against that overrated ND team. I forgot.
No they (your eyes) were wrong. I rewatched that several times, hoping to see if we should contest the call. No he clearly was in the endzone with the ball.
I ask you again, they didn't support the run at all. They got scorched on 5 plays and only a bad pass saved the TD. What did they do that was so great? They had one pick on a nice play, but otherwise were non-existant? How is that great?
5 plays that they blew on a total on 8 passing plays in the second half isn't nitpicky. But Witner did have the one good coverage. Again, what did they do that was so great?
But to his credit that was the only hit Crowell had in the game. The rest of the time he was getting crunched or beat on pass plays. So they were just going by what the norm was.
No, we needed safeties. I have no issue with the selection. Not sure but what screwed up logic you came up with that. But Witner and Simpson played like rookies. And no as bad as the LBers were today, those 5 plays were on the safeties.
Well there was 2 long and one mid range pass to the TE's. The incomplete in the endzone to Graham was also bad coverage. Finally Simpson had the inside on the long pass to Caldwell. Otherall in the second half that was 5 of the key plays and our Safeties chocked on all of them. In addition, they were non-existant in run support, so overall 1 pick and a poor game otherwise.