VABills

Yes, the one to Mcgahee that Losman threw behind him and he slipped. But Mcgahee pulled a Sanders and got a 20 yard gain or so from it.

Oops I was thinking RT. my bad. BTW, what's wrong with Reyes. He seemed to hold his own. The jail breaks we had seemed to come from LT, Center and RT.

Better watch it. When you say RG you are picking on everyone favorite single digit IQ player.

And yet somehow we lost that game.

I think not. Not even close. Try: Peppers Freeney Strahan Jenkins Rogers Stroud Granted Seymours good, but Gandy is going to be facing better guys. And back to the original point of the post. So what if Oakland has a worse line. So we are 31st. Victory dance all around.

Oh okay. I understand.

Obvious you didn't see his new gay commercial.

But he's 6-5 and 230 pounds.

Are you sure?

Oh stop.

Nope I'd agree with you. usually is best when your "best" receiver steps up and gets more then 1 or 2 catches in a divisional game. But I have been wrong before so who knows, maybe it is best to have your 6th stringer receiver be the key to your passing game.

Pictures of Naomi?

Obviously you haven't met us then.

Oh this from the only midget on this board shorter than me.

Thanks ramius for the support.

Have fun. But I don't understand your issue. Brooks is a poor QB. Okay I agree. But he is better then the other 2 still.

For example let's go to the last week Losman played last year. JP was 10-27 183 yards 1 TD, and 3 INT's. Brooks was 27/49 with a TD. Different story there. Pretty easy to take a snapshot in time to make your call. And while I didn't see the game, Brooks was 6-14, 68 yards, and got sacked a lot. Jp had a few more throws, a few more completions and yards, but overall they both lost, and neither threw an INT. But JP fumbled a few times. Say what you want and Brooks is probably a bad Qb but he's still better.

Wow this is funny. Sad thing is, you are basing it one game. Sad thing is Darin, Brooks while a poor QB now, and maybe always is still better then Holcomb and Loasman. Sad isn't it?

Well if we didn't have the war in Iraq then we could spend more on animal research or pay for better government oversight to prevent animal research, depending on what will get your vote.

Kung Fu, where they kept going back to his teaching in the shrine.

And with that sir we can finally agree on something 100%.

Never said that, but usually one sees a touch of ability there early. Kind of like Witner, while he may not have been perfect he showed enough to prove that he will be good someday.

I was being sarcastic. That is the exact same excuse people have been using for Losman, Gates, Haddad, laud, etc.... , etc... etc... for years. And how many ever really work out?

Wow, you're easy. I wouldn't have voted for him.

He's young, he' still learning. He lost most of his first year to injury. You have to give him a chance to develop. He is going to make rookie mistakes until he gets a full season of starts under his belt.