VABills

1. Are you on any goverment contracts? Then yes he does since he pays taxes (or not). 2. I'm sure he would be happy too. 3. Well 2 out 3.

But with mental issues he would be found not guilty by reasons of insanity.

No you don't get to question them. You're a criminal, you lost your rights.

It's a crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement In many jurisdictions, such as the United States, copyright infringement is a strict liability tort or crime.

Actually he was hired now as a fulltime scout, and I don't get to see him much. He never said anything about Peters however. But I guess if he is a fulltime scout I bet he knows more than you and I ever will about player skills.

What to show me in this thread where I said Peters isn't good.

Again, since you like to read media quotes and one liners to dictate your vaste knowledge of football experience, you may want to read some quotes from Jauron at the end of the season where he felt it might be better to have Peters move back to RT and get a different player at LT. I guess you missed that. I'll try to dig it up.

Again, this from someone who thinks if they are not planted firmly up the fans but and say nothing but good things they are against us. BTW, try this on for size, as far as tackle rankings and maybe, why with peters at 25th he isn't going: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/scouting?position=46

So the "word" comes from Steve Tasker a lifelong Bills and Marv Levy friend and homeboy. Woohoo.

Except, maybe, just maybe, just like every other Bills player we the fans tend to over estimate their ability and worth and are shocked when these players don't seem to get the big contract or recognition. Maybe just maybe Peters isn't that good, and the hype and fawning over him was just because he was the best lineman out of a very bad bunch. Not that he was great or even good, but he was leapyears ahead of the rest of the tards on our own team.

Just because he is a bad guy, doesn't make you an innocent bystander.

Johnny coli is a liberal, he is oblivious to anything unless he hears the CNN spin on it. Media facts are his only concern.

We do every year. green beans, tomatoes, squash, egg plant, bitter melon, strawberries (sometimes). We get enough for ourselves and give a shitload away. Almost forgot, we plant basil as well.

Well it wont be Fez since he would never be seen with a Sony product. Sony bad.

Except Moore was a 210 DE who noway was even going to be big anough to play that spot in the NFL. Wire was asked to not gain weight and play SS. Again both played out of position, but in Moores case henever would have been big enough to play his natural position. Wire on the otherhand was really only about 10-15 pounds light and could have gained earlier and stayed in his natural spot.

You're right, because a guy who was a 2nd team all american at stanford, and 1st team all pac-10 at the LINEBACKER position obviously has no talent and no ability to play linebacker.

As least one person here appreciates my sense of humor. The rest of you are make a frog look like he's had a train done on his ass at Dupont Circle.

Isn't that dudette?

Never met Tom have you.

Mash was the best show of the 70's and 80's.

I hated the show. but here you go. http://www.mrtones.com/nokia_ringtone/magn...ne/64041/10290/

Again, the incentives ahve to be there. Afterall it really isn't "Exxons" money. It is your's and mine since we are the owners of the company through our investments eaither directly in stock purchase or through our mutual funds. We drive their business decisions to make the most profit and to have them take advantage of the tax loopholes to put more money into our retirement, college funds , etc... The only incentive to make the Exxons, Dominions, etc... become even more environmentally friendly as well as less dependant on mid-east oil is to well give them/us incentives to make the stock even more profitable as they are required to make changes. Else they/we the stockholders will not like it very much. The markets fgo down, less money in the economy, and lo and behold, we get laid off. That is their business model and every public companies busines model. The incentive financially has to be there for the stockholders.

So you don't believe that the Exxons, Citgo's, Dominion Power, etc... aren't investing long term in alternative fuels. Companies that make billions typically do so by having a good business model to not only make themselves profitable today, but really look long term at profits as well. I would venture to guess that they are easily the largest investers in alternative fuels. That's also why they probably continue to have record post tax profits by utilizing those tax deductions for creating alternatives.

Nose warmers.

Liberalism, just another work for socialism.