Pokebball

I'm missing your concern, I guess?

Understand that there are degrees of woke, right? I think you're including some pretty mild shyt in your definition of of woke in order to defend some pretty crazy levels of woke. Understand there is a difference.

Why'd he do that, I wonder?

I'm hearing it regularly. Even from some Dem mayors now LOL

Not really. The WH isn't enforcing the laws on the books.

Our system can certainly be used in unfair ways. You think not?

What's worse, an illegal trespass at the southern border or a citizen entering their countries capital? The hypocrisy from the left on these things is remarkable.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2019/02/02/charter-schools-are-not-public-schools/

I think education is actually a priority to poor families. Their needs are different, presenting different challenges. One example...transportation needs are different. Poor families struggle getting their kiddos to/from school and/or other educational opportunities. If the parents are working or don't have access to another vehicle, many opportunities are limited. Address the transportation challenges and those kiddos (and their parents) would love to participate. And why the fight? Those in the public school system are selfishly protecting their interests, not what's best for the kiddos. They are protecting their salaries, their lavish facilities and infrastructures, etc.

Charter schools in my state get less funding than public schools and perform better. All kiddos have access to that better education.

If the taxpayers in the community want the funding to follow the kiddo, it follows the kiddo. Most state constitutions require educating the kiddos and doesn't dictate how. Metrics and outcomes clearly show that kiddos are educated better in charter schools. And it's not even close. Are you most interested in better outcomes or not?

The funding should follow the child, on a per child basis. The funding is to educate the kiddo.

20 dudes that you really fear!

Nearly successful? That's an interesting take?

There were quite a few TT fans in the War last night wearing Mahomes jerseys

Hasn't this happened before? At least once I think? The Mouse and whatever TV provider got their poop together. I think it only lasted a couple of days.

mental capacity you say?

Trump has plenty of dirty laundry that he said, tweeted, etc. I like good, honest, transparent debate. Making shyt up us very frustrating. Repeating lies over and over is most frustrating. I don't understand why people do this?

You totally missed the point

This has been proven when either has been on the sidelines with injuries. I guess one could argue who the QB2 was, but I think it speaks more to the rest of the offense on the field.

Was Basham a hit or a miss in the draft? Sticking with a miss longer than you should is compounding a mistake, if you can even call a draft pick a mistake. I'd say the drafting is the easy part. The development of these guys and the subsequent roster management is the harder part IMO. That's when the sausage gets made. I don't know how anyone can be too critical of Beane/McDermott, based only on the results while they've been here. Getting Buffalo to 12-13 wins is, quite honestly, remarkable. How fortunate are we to be whining about 12 win seasons? It means we've had decent play, at a minimum, at every position IMO. To get over the next hill, requires some player management of some of these kids that have brought us to this place. It's hard. It feels unloyal, right? Many of you have read the book, or heard this said before. The most common reason a person, or in this case a team, can't get from "good" to "great" is the fact that you're good. Good is hard to let go of, it's harder to change. But you have to give up good to get to great. I continue to trust Beane & McDermott.

Did anyone else read this multiple times and just smile?

OT is more important than QB2 IMO!

Did Joe drop out of 24 race?

Oh, he's misquoted an awful lot