
Buffalo03
-
Posts
5,618 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo03
-
-
4 minutes ago, I am the egg man said:
He hasn't showed much on my FFT, so no, the Bills should stay the course.
That's because of Matt LaFleur. Not because of Jones
-
7 minutes ago, Buffalo Junction said:
Jones is going to get PAID. No way Beane gives a RB a $15MM/yr contract which is what Jones will be looking for. The guy knows that his receiving ability, speed and TD totals make his a unique talent.
I don't think it will cost $15 million a year to get Jones. That's Ezekiel Elliot money. He's not Ezekiel Elliot but he's very good. I honestly don't think any team will pay him that. I'm thinking more in possibly the $8 to $9 million dollar range on a 4 year deal for him. This offense is a RB away from being exactly where it needs to be
-
He's a 2021 free agent, severely underused in Green Bay, an excellent receiver out of the backfield with good hands and needs to have a lead back role. Just turned 26 on Dec 2nd so we can get a solid 4 years out of him at least. He has more rushing TDs than any other RB the last 2 seasons. There is absolutely no way that I can see this guy choosing to resign in GB. He would be stupid to do that.
Granted, Moss and Singletary are here. I like both but I'd rather have Aaron Jones over Singletary. I also wouldn't mind sets with two of our backs on the field at the same time. I read an article of the top 5 places for him next year and all of the Patriots, Dolphins and Jets were on the list. I'd rather not have him in the division unless it's in our backfield. What does everyone think? I would love the idea of Aaron Jones being here
-
Can someone tell me how to change the title?
-
But it's pretty funny
-
5
-
14
-
2
-
1
-
-
Gotta be the all reds for Sunday Night Football next week I would think
-
Ahhhh, Beth Mowins season. The best time of the year
-
I feel like if they ever had Dick Jauron mic'd up when he was here that anytime we did something bad he would go up to the players and say "it's ok, don't worry about it. It's tough to win in this league" lol
-
Too bad that Candlestick is no longer around. It would have been sweet to play this one game there
-
1
-
-
-
13 minutes ago, Warcodered said:
It's a team sport a QB doesn't get to say it's not fair I didn't throw it close to that guy that intercepted it the WR batted it to him. I mean he can either eat a sack or see if he can't throw it farther than 30 yards....which as an NFL QB he damn well should be able to.
I know the game isn't always fair and I do think a batted pass should be a pick because that's what it is. I also agree that a QB should be able to throw a ball 30 yards down the field but having to throw it that far to avoid an intentional grounding penalty seems little ridiculous to me. Especially since most times if the QB is that far back he probably has a ton of guys chasing him or in his face. Can't really expect him to get it to the line of scrimmage 30 yards up the field. Just seems dumb to me
-
10 minutes ago, Warcodered said:
Your not supposed to hike the ball 30 yards behind you.
I get that but it's not the QB doing that. It's the center firing it over his head and him running backwards to make sure the other team doesn't recover it. It's not the QBs fault. He should be able to just pick it up and toss it out of bounds and have it be an incomplete pass
-
2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:
doesn't matter if he was out of the pocket if he doesn't get it past the line of scrimmage.
So if a ball goes over his head and rolls 30 yards backwards before the QB picks it up, he has to fire it 30 or 35 yards down the field to not get intentional grounding? Is he supposed to just take a 30 yard loss? That's stupid
-
How big is the pocket? The ball went past Wentz and he picked it up around 15 yards behind the line and then ran back another 5 or 10 yards and then launched it. Does the pocket go 50 yards back?
-
2 hours ago, PUNT750 said:
agree 100% - - who cares except NERD fans who want the Bills to be a feature attraction in the NFL- -silly!
1:00 games constantly week in and week out become boring. It's nice to be in the national spotlight for the biggest game of the week instead of watching the Cowboys on primetime 5 times a year. So you have to stay up later one or two times a year, why is that a big deal. Who cares? I get up at 7am every morning and am fine with it. It's rare for us. I enjoy it
-
5 hours ago, Bronxbomber21 said:
Does the Browns running game not scare you?
I wouldn't mind playing the Colts or Ravens 2 offense that look like they struggle at times
Non of these QBs scare me
I am worried about the Browns run game but that's all they really have. I'm not worried about Baker at all. If we can focus our game completely on stopping the run and succeed then we will win that game, hands down.
Tannehill, while not great, scares me more than Baker does. I also am more afraid of AJ Brown over any WR on that Browns team. Also, having Derrick Henry in the backfield is scary as well.
I feel you can stop the run of the Browns and beat them. The Titans, I don't think you can necessarily do the same thing
-
11 minutes ago, Dablitzkrieg said:
Who cares. Play anyone and beat them. The goal is to win the Superbowl right?
Yes, but if you can gain momentum by playing a favorable matchup in round 1, I would much rather have the best matchup possible to start it off
-
For me I want no part of playing the Titans in the first round. That's a scary team and very physical. I also don't wanna play the Raiders in the first round either. Both teams are gonna be tough outs in the playoffs
The two I do wanna play are the Browns or the Dolphins. I feel we can definitely handle either one of these teams and would allow us good momentum for the next round
-
This would be the week he comes back, wouldn't it? That's just the way it works.
-
24 minutes ago, Process said:
I've never understood this. Does us playing 7 hours later the previous Sunday really give the broncos a big advantage?
Exactly, I said the same thing. It's no different than playing on a monday night and then Sunday at 1pm. It's still 6 days
-
14 minutes ago, njbuff said:
So, the Bills are playing the Broncos on the road on Saturday after playing the Steelers at home on a Sunday night?
Yep, sounds fair.
🤮🤮🤮
Is there a difference if the game against the Steelers was Sunday at 1pm? It's still 6 days no matter how you look at it. No different than playing Monday night and then the following Sunday at 1pm
-
14 minutes ago, Bills fan since 87 said:
Sure would love it if the NFL let us know when and at what time this game is. I assume we'll get the Saturday nod but what time? That's a busy weekend for me and I would like to plan around the Bills accordingly...
This was just stated on NFL Network.
Week 15
Bills at Broncos 4:30pm Saturday
Panthers at Packers 8:20pm Saturday nignt
-
1
-
-
With the way the new playoff format is with 7 teams and only the top team getting a first round bye, technically the 3 seed could have home field throughout. Especially, with the above scenario. If we did play the Browns round 1 and win and the Raiders went back to Arrowhead and knock off the Chiefs again which to me is possible, that means that the lowest remaining team would go to Pittsburgh after their bye. If that ends up being the Raiders after knocking off the Chiefs, that means with the Chiefs eliminated, the Bills become the next highest remaining seed and will also play round 2 at home as well. If the Raiders go to Pittsburgh and knock them off and the Bills win round 2, that leaves the Bills home for the Championship game against any remaining opponent. It's crazy to think about but could happen
-
1
-
-
I think we're a good team. I think the games against the Titans and Chiefs makes our numbers and stuff look a little worse but we have beaten good teams
Dolphins 6-4
Rams 6-3
Raiders 6-4 (nearly knocked of the Chiefs twice)
Seahawks 7-3
I think we are right below the Steelers and Chiefs and I honestly feel if we play the Chiefs again that we can beat them as well as the Titans when we aren't preparing for both teams in the same week and we don't know if we are gonna play one or both teams with one of them coming off two and half weeks rest to prepare
-
1
-
How about Aaron Jones at RB next year?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
He is underutilized. He averages 10 to 12 carries a game and barely gets thrown to anymore like he did last year. If you watch a Green Bay game they will have Jamaal Williams on the field for an entire 95 yard drive at times. If the Packers stopped having such a hard on for Jamaal Williams, Jones would get 25 carries a game like he should be